Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choice restriction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Choice restriction

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable topic, and the only two sources which back it up are a self published (WP:PROMO?) blog post, and a academic paper which is surely synthesized, as it does not talk about manipulation of any kind. If anything else, it also reads like a dictionary entry. No proper results come up on Google, and there is very obscure mention in Google Scholar, outside of the paper already cited and so is not worth mentioning. Plasticwonder (talk) 19:38, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:18, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:DICTDEF and probably WP:OR as well. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are articles in G-Scholar (like this) that use the phrase "choice restriction" but I didn't find any that use it in the way defined here. It also isn't listed in the Manipulation (psychology) article, and I assume if it were a topic under that rubric it would be there. Then again, if it is it could be added there, with appropriate sources. Lamona (talk) 02:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.