Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Diaz Ortiz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:24, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Claire Diaz Ortiz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to establish notability. Also, is not adequately notable per WP:Notability/WP:BLP. Further, article is a puff piece. Qwerty Binary (talk) 10:37, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:GNG. Interview in Forbes,[1] Q&A at Washington Post,[2] Fast Company profile,[3] Huffington Post,[4] Latino Magazine,[5] NRB,[6] The Christian Post,[7] CNN.[8] -- Green Cardamom (talk) 15:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Green Cardamom. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 21:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:31, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A lot of coverage of her and her book in reliable sources. Meets WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.