Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristina Gallardo-Domâs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cristina Gallardo-Domâs

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced BLP. Not clear that subject meets WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 01:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Spain, and Chile. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've added some references for the artist. I've NO idea I they are suitable. I will have a look again tomorrow.Knitsey (talk) 00:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anything is better than what we had, which was nothing. Thank you for your effort.4meter4 (talk) 00:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. There might be some more refs I can find. Knitsey (talk) 00:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added more refs. There might be more to come. I would really like for someone to take a look to see if they're suitable? Knitsey (talk) 16:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I should say, I haven't really editied the article much, just provided refs for what was already there. I will re-work it a bit if this AfD results in keep. I need to check on the date order for all the operas listed. Knitsey (talk) 16:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Knitsey It appears you are eligible for access to Wikipedia Library. You should definitely take advantage of it, as it will save you an incredible amount of time. Cielquiparle (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ashamed to say, I completely forgot about that. Thank you so much for the reminder. Knitsey (talk) 13:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Prefer to see further improvement rather than deleting. --Mervyn (talk) 09:16, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. A review of recently added sources would be helpful. If they are adequate would the nominator consider a withdrawal?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References have been greatly expanded and discog and copy editing begun. Notability seems clear. --Mervyn (talk) 11:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and keep improving. Unquestionably notable soprano with a large volume of in-depth coverage over a career spanning 30+ years who easily meets WP:GNG. ProQuest returns 906 hits in Spanish and English, including a very large number of sizable reviews and feature articles like this one in Opera News, this huge review of a live performance early in her career in the Hartford Courant, this American Record Guide review of one of her recordings...it's so many that it will take a long time to go through it all. But definitely worth continuing to improve this article. Cielquiparle (talk) 13:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article referencing has improved and as Cielquiparle has pointed out, there is more can be done to improve this article in the future with better searches. I think that at this point, it passes WP:GNG.Knitsey (talk) 13:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.