Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuchiniș River

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. "Too short an article" is as about as invalid as it gets, If Shawn in Montreal or Oakshade wanna start an SPI I obviously have no objections but anywho closing as SK (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 04:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cuchiniș River

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too short an article Ardomlank (talk) 17:32, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's odd, just after we get this almost identically worded Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kvinnefossen from a different editor, this new user (or sock?) pops up with another non-policy based, wrong-headed deletion rationale for a body of water. Article length is not a reason to delete, not if the subject of the article is clear enough, which it surely is. Keep. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - A flawlessly executed AfD on this nom's very first mainspace edit? I smell socks. Not proper rationale for deletion. --Oakshade (talk) 22:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Don't care. Don't be so Anglocentric, there is outside world. I am from other Wiki. Ardomlank (talk) 19:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 March 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:03, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Oakshade. Insert CleverPhrase Here 02:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.