- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- D4 Stores (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete: There is some coverage to be found view GNews, but it doesn't quite add up to in-depth coverage. However, given what is available through GNews, I'll easily believe that there is in-depth coverage to be found somewhere. So perhaps a local inhabitant with better access can tip the scale. -- BenTels (talk) 15:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - A shop in a hotel, no notability whatsoever. The hotel (Ballsbridge hotel) that this store is in, doesn't even have an article. Snappy (talk) 16:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Quite. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of this being more than a run-of-the-mill shop. Any media attention appears to have been inherited from the owner's surname being well-known in the Irish retail sector than intrinsic notability. AllyD (talk) 17:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It's launch attracted some attention here. It apparently violated local zoning requirements. I see no evidence of the multiple significant coverage needed, and aside from being covered at launch, it has not attracted sustained notice. -- Whpq (talk) 15:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.