- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Already speedily deleted per G11 (non-admin closure). Vulcan's Forge (talk) 04:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DataWalk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no indication of meeting notability guidelines. References are not significant coverage, neither are the external links. noq (talk) 12:33, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 12:40, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 12:40, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 12:40, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, notability of product or/and company is not shown. -- Oisguad (talk) 08:22, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per G11. What a massive advertisement: Words such as "honoured", "unique", listing customers and patents make up most of the article; All suggest a WP:COI or WP:PAID connection. Has already been deleted under the name Draft:DataWalk and (from memory) not much has changed since it was deleted there. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 14:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.