Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinah Jane Hansen
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Fifth Harmony. --BDD (talk) 16:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Dinah Jane Hansen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual lacking ghits and Gnews of substance. Suggest this get redirected to Fifth Harmony. reddogsix (talk) 03:02, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 04:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 04:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 04:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 04:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per nom. Subject's notability to date is not independent of the group; does not satisfy WP:MUSICBIO. Gong show 18:49, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy redirect to Fifth Harmony. I see that the nom already tried that but then the article's creator reverted it without explanation. Erpert WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 07:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Fifth Harmony. The band's members are not notable outside of the band and I have redirected the others that were not at AFD. –anemoneprojectors– 08:44, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as per not individually notable. Murry1975 (talk) 14:58, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.