Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (evolutionary biology)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (WP:SNOW) -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:32, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dominant group (evolutionary biology)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another Dominantgroupcruft WP:SYNTH violation, none of the sources join Dominant group and the topic together. Cerejota (talk) 04:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —202.124.73.100 (talk) 05:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:OR by WP:SYNTH. Searching does not suggest this combination of terms is a notable topic. The basic idea of dominance is already covered at Dominance (ecology). -- 202.124.73.100 (talk) 05:08, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The IP is right that insofar as this is a topic rather than a two-word phrase that appears in some evolutionary biology articles, it is already discussed in an article which is actually readable. Do not merge. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 06:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Roscelese. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:36, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't even exist. SL93 (talk) 16:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Incoherent OR. Sławomir Biały (talk) 20:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "dominant group" is a phrase in the English language; it is not a special concept in relation to evolutioary biology. Relevant concepts are covered elsewhere. LadyofShalott 04:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. OR. Glrx (talk) 19:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Incoherent, unfocused. No topic. Binksternet (talk) 22:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per AN/I thread, SYNTH article created for strange 'research' project. Out of all these DG articles, this is the one I should understand the most, but it's incomprehensible. Searching 'The Origin of Species' for "dominant group" and "dominant groups"... undeniable OR Jebus989 ^✰ 14:56, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.