Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evading Justice - Perjury as a related offence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neutrality^talk 20:04, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evading Justice - Perjury as a related offence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long unsourced personal essay. Hard to see how this is encyclopedic material, frankly, and it seems to overlap with the existing Perjury article. Prioryman (talk) 09:13, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Long unsourced personal essay. Plus it's not a topic, it's a specialized connection/confluence between multiple topics. Not encyclopedic. Zero sources. Near zero chance of notability or this particular combination/confluence of topics and angle created by the editor. North8000 (talk) 13:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Essay / original research. Fork of perjury. Too specific to Nigeria. Etc. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An essay. SL93 (talk) 16:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:46, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's an essay -- Whpq (talk) 17:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, original-research and opinion essay. Probably WP:SNOW at this point. TJRC (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.