Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firewheel Golf Park
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:58, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Firewheel Golf Park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Search results show there is one mention of the park here which obviously wouldn't help the article and another small mention here. With a slightly positive note, Google News archives produced several links that would establish notability, but I can't see how "subscription required" and "payment required" would help this article. SwisterTwister talk 04:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GregJackP Boomer! 00:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:56, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete insufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 12:28, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.