Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Folu Adeboye

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 11:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Folu Adeboye (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no apparent notability , besides publishing of some religious tracts; essentially no indpendedent source that are not pr. One of a group of similar articles DGG ( talk ) 10:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sun8908Talk 14:33, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Sun8908Talk 14:33, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:17, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:18, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — This is very much similar to this now deleted article which was correctly AFD’ed by DGG. Individuals aren’t notable due to their proximity to notable individuals they are notable because the satisfy our general notability criteria for inclusion or the relevant SNG. The subject of the article doesn’t seem to satisfy any/either. Celestina007 (talk) 00:31, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.