Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaea Beyond the Son
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete (w/possible COI by author of article) SkierRMH (talk) 00:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Gaea Beyond the Son (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No notability asserted in the form of reliable sources. The notability guideline for books says that a book should, at a minimum, have an ISBN number and be in a national library, but "meeting these threshold standards does not imply that a book is notable". shoy (words words) 03:11, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Article does not meet our notability guideline for books. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless sources can be found. WP:NOT#DIR applies here - there must be masses, huge numbers of non-notable books and this one doesn't seem any different.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 06:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable bookBalloonman (talk) 07:32, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This book was published just last month. It appears to be both the first novel of the author P.D. Gilson and the first novel published by Helios Publishing. A new book by a non-notable author and published by a non-notable publisher does not meet WP:BK. Bláthnaid 10:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.