Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genna Rose Sheedy-Feldman
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 07:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Genna Rose Sheedy-Feldman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Absolutely no Google hits for this artist. No assertion of notability or citations to demonstrate this. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 21:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete along with The Doggy Picaso. Non-notable, looks like it's an advertisement to me. -- Dougie WII 22:00, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Impossible to source. Because no sources are avaliable, you can't prove the claim of notability in the article.--SJP 22:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete no claim to notability. the other article is just astroturfing. Clubmarx (talk) 04:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as blatant self-promotion. Pastordavid (talk) 20:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.