- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn local tv sports reporter, no significant coverage in independent RSes establishing notability, WP:BIO Carlossuarez46 06:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No apparent notability. Alberon 09:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Caknuck (talk) 17:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not quite notable enough. • Lawrence Cohen 18:34, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. jj137 (Talk) 01:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google reveals 812 results for "Guy Rawlings," but I don't think that he is notable enough to justify an article. — Wenli (reply here) 03:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No sign of any substantial coverage anywhere, let alone in independent reliable sources, so clearly fails WP:BIO. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.