Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Headline Prime

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Headline Prime

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable block, can easily just be brought up in the main article. ViperSnake151 Talk 20:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not much in the way of coverage. I found this news article about how adding Headline prime doubled ratings for HLN, but this is not especially substantial. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 20:25, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. 20:26, 16 August 2012 (UTC) I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 20:26, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. 20:26, 16 August 2012 (UTC) I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 20:26, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 01:44, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Naming and branding has been entirely abandoned, article reads as not being updated since 2008. What little content there is can easily be merged into the HLN article if it isn't in there already. Nate • (chatter) 02:50, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.