Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icon for Hire (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Icon for Hire. Will userfy upon request. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Icon for Hire (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

clearly WP:TOOSOON. No RSes can or will be found for over a month. Move to user space and restore when the album meets notability guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:31, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:53, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:53, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy. I agree with nominator. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Only Do not even userfy it right now because then you keep the cover art, which must get deleted, so the only solution to the matter is a simple redirect to the band page.HotHat (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.