Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamila Abitar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jamila Abitar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very little coverage, nothing in-depth, fails WP:GNG, and nothing indicates she passes WP:NAUTHOR. A nice review was added, although I am not sure that the source is an RS, as it seems to not have editorial oversight. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, although she's been writing for almost 10 years, with very little coverage. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:11, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for all I know she may be a wonderful poet, but I have searched her unique name and I am not finding sources to support notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:08, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment She does have an article in French WP. None of the sources look very compelling, but I don't know the media. Perhaps someone with expertise in reliable French sources could take a look? valereee (talk) 19:17, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

True. I did look at it before opining delete, and it is very poorly sourced: to her blog, to things she published, one news article. Being published is not enough. Being translated does make it look probably that she's notable. But we really do need some sources to establish that she is. Anyone who manages to soruce this page should feel free to ping me to reconsider.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:16, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Me too. If this can be properly sourced to show notability, not above changing my position. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Subject fails WP:NCREATIVE. Sourcing is quite poor and the French version fares no better: there, the sources are blogs and fringe sites. -The Gnome (talk) 14:24, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She has articles on the German, French and Spanish language Wikipedias, but there's nothing across all those that meets WP:GNG. Bondegezou (talk) 17:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.