Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin B. Terry-Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 22:41, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Justin B. Terry-Smith

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. /ƒETCH COMMS / 00:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Justin B Terry-Smith has had numerous interviews which have the information that has been reflected in this article. The interviews have been in his words and are valid. The reference are also from valid publications, newspapers, and including the Channel 9 News interview about HIV/AIDS in DC and Logo's HIV + Me segment interview with Ongina Ryan. Terry-Smith has received significant coverage in reliable sources. If there are changes to be made I would love to check my sources and changes whatever information needs to be changes but please do not delete this article. Terry-Smith is a pillar in the HIV/AIDS Community. Which resources do not have significant coverage? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsmithco98 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jcgoble3 (talk) 01:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: While this person does appear to have some degree of significant coverage, especially within the gay and HIV communities, I struggled to find any reliable sources that were more than interviews with the subject or writings from the subject himself which does not go toward establishing enough notability for inclusion in Wikipedia. Topher385 (talk) 13:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.