Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K'un-L'un

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Features of the Marvel Universe. —Darkwind (talk) 07:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

K'un-L'un

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional location in the Marvel Universe. No real world context and written in-universe. I can find no sources and I doubt there are any sources that would ever be able to add significant real world context to this article. Ridernyc (talk) 21:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A number of Marvel reference books discuss this location and it has appeared in a large number of comic books. It's likely that citations can be found. The article could be expanded. Where did you look for references? 42of8 (talk) 05:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete as non-notable. This should be on Wikia.com. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Features of the Marvel Universe. I'm going to repeat myself, but the rationale is the same as in Lemuria. Now that we've kept Features, it seems like a good place to merge this article, and one of the better arguments for keeping Features was that we could merge all these semi-notable locations into it. Extended coverage of these topics is best suited to Wikia, and a brief overview in Features seems more appropriate than a dedicated article that will struggle with notability issues and reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per arguments of 42of8 and bd2412; failing that, merge into Features of the Marvel Universe would be better than deletion. BOZ (talk) 15:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Adequately referenced for its subject matter. bd2412 T 15:56, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the features article. The tidbit about the name is too trivial to establish the notability of the topic, so it should not remain independent without satisfying a certain threshold. TTN (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability out of the fictional work in which it appears not established.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the Features article. There are sources for this (e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4]), but none of them have substantial enough coverage to warrant a stand-alone article. --Cerebellum (talk) 00:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.