Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kill Shot (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 05:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kill Shot (video game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Added by what appears to be a paid editor. No refs to support notability. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable, just advertising. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 23:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 01:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's got several reviews cataloged at Metacritic, including [1] from Pocket Gamer, [2] from Gamezebo, and [3] from 148apps.com. It was also the subject of a lawsuit that got some attention: [4] from Gamesindustry.biz, [5] from VentureBeat. Also, [6] from Adweek looks pretty in-depth. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:39, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I expanded the article. I think it makes much more of a claim to notability now, and it's not especially promotional. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the references given by NinjaRobotPirate. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, article doesn't look to bad after expansion. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 14:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.