Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kollision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:35, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kollision

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Artist and related mixtapes do not meet WP:MUS. Being signed to a label such as Quality Control Music isn't enough to make one eligible for an article. I am also nominating the following Kollision-related pages:

The Kollision template has already been nominated for deletion. Nice4What (talk) 10:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MVTTXW$: Letting you know I've put these Kollision-related articles up for deletion since you've created all of them. Nice4What (talk) 10:32, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 13:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He is a too soon. Trillfendi (talk) 05:16, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all related nominated pages. Only significant third party recognition so far is being one of multiple artists in a larger article in Billboard that is about his record label, but not about this subject. Others are user submitted press release-type stuff in online sources like HotNewHipHop. As noted above, WP:TOOSOON at best. All related articles are promotional by same SPA editor. ShelbyMarion (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.