Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Romanian Nobel laureates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Romanian Nobel laureates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No need for such per WP:LISTCRUFT. Greenbörg (talk) 19:08, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Redirect – Only four entries; already sufficiently covered at List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country#Romania. J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 19:51, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:

Per WP:NOTDUP relative to Category:Romanian Nobel laureates.
Per WP:LISTPURP, functions as a useful navigational aid, as evidenced in part per the 439 page views the page has received in the last thirty days.
Conversely, the category page has only received 59 page views in the last thirty days.
Lastly, the listcruft essay is just that, an opinion essay, not a notability guideline.

– North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See my argument at WP:Articles for deletion/List of Swedish Nobel laureates. J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 07:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I feel this is a valid navigational approach. Carrite (talk) 03:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:CLT; no need to delete or redirect. ansh 666 18:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.