Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by GO!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:51, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by GO!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is classic wikipedia not a directory territory. These are simply lists of shows broadcast by the networks. They're not encyclopedic, difficult to maintain, and basically covered by numerous other pages, including the primary network pages. Shadowjams (talk) 08:46, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all (listed below). I'm partially persuaded by previous arguments listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of programs broadcast by networks, in which it was argued that having these lists kept long lists of programs out of articles about the networks and cable channels themselves. If these were short lists, it would be less of a problem, but they are not. I'm also partially motivated by the potential loss of programs-by-network lists like List of programs broadcast by the DuMont Television Network, which would not have been possible to compile just ten years ago. Firsfron of Ronchester 07:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you high? Your link is from 2006. That was half a decade ago (about the same time you ran for adminship... perhaps if there were reelections...). These are TV LISTINGS AND NOTHING ELSE. This is so outside of policy I question your competence for even suggesting keep. Shadowjams (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not high, just because I don't share your opinion. I don't think you appear to know what a "TV listing" is. A television listing tells you what's on TV, not what programs aired on which television networks and cable channels. You... you don't appear to know what you've nominated for deletion. Firsfron of Ronchester 11:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:21, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it is an unsourced copy of information that is in Go! (Australian TV channel) - redundant to the main article and this list is unlikely to grow large enough to need a separate article for a long time - Peripitus (Talk) 10:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Peripitus - also too changeable and difficult to verify from reliable sources. Orderinchaos 22:11, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.