Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic Kingdom Resort Area

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There appears to be a clear consensus to reform this content, but as one comment here states, this may be best dealt with via a talk page discussion than an AFD debate. I certainly see no value of relisting this again given the trickle of debate thus far; I recommend editors discuss the possibilities from here at talk. KaisaL (talk) 02:52, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Magic Kingdom Resort Area

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should have been deleted under speedy deletion criteria (WP:A3: "...and "See also" sections, a rephrasing of the title, ... and/or images.") as it is a "see also" page in that all it does it links to other pages. It is just obscurity by given the different headers and adding some pictures. This page duplicates/forks Template:Walt Disney World and Walt_Disney_World#Resorts. Spshu (talk) 19:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 20:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this is a test AfD for additional similar articles: Epcot Resort Area, Animal Kingdom Resort Area, Disney Springs Resort Area, ESPN Wide World of Sports Resort Area. Spshu (talk) 20:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move to List of Magic Kingdom resorts. This is really a list rather than an article nor a 'See also'. I see no policy grounds for deletion and, though this is not a 'keep' ground, FWIW it looks useful. Just Chilling (talk) 23:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CFORK is a guide line, which I should have mention in my nomination post and we are not a travel guide either which seems to be its use. Why is it necessary to maintain multiple list in different locations? Spshu (talk) 17:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There seems no doubt that a comprehensive rationalisation is needed but that is better dealt with by talk page discussion rather than by a series of AFDs. Just Chilling (talk) 22:47, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:40, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into a list of all the Disney resort areas, per above. White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 22:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.