Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maltese Brazilian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Immigration to Brazil. because its useful (non-admin closure) Cerejota (talk) 07:52, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maltese Brazilian

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and that's all this article offers. In fact, it offers a definition that isn't even needed. What else would Maltese Brazilian mean? D O N D E groovily Talk to me 23:17, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. — Red Baboon (talk) 23:36, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be merged into Immigration to Brazil, as had been proposed since 2008, and as noted on the page. Most past outcomes of this type have typically ended in merger. AfD is not a place for this. Bearian (talk) 19:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It should not be merged because there is nothing to merge. If you merge nothing, you then are forever bound to keep this redirect to preserve the edit history of nothing. Unless you propose putting something from this page into the Immigration to Brazil article that won't be deleted from there, don't propose a merge. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 00:24, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nothing to merge, WP:DICDEF, infobox contains additional assertions but these are unreferenced and non-notable. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:22, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Dicdef and nothing more. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:00, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.