Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marist Wallball Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted per WP:CSD#G4. Neil ☎ 14:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marist Wallball Association

This article has been speedily deleted, has been reposted, was speedy tagged, had the speedy tag removed, was prodded, had that removed, and is still not notable. It receives no Google hits and does not express notability in the article; it has no reliable sources to indicate that it can meet notability guidelines whatsoever. Delete Tony Fox (arf!) 00:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. SolidPlaid 00:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Speedy Delete per CSD G4 - recreation of deleted material. Also reads somewhat like an advertisment, but not enough for G11 to apply. And, it fails both WP:ORG (WP:SPORT is a rejected policy, so WP:ORG is next best) and WP:VERI (improperly references a Wikipedia article and the organisation's homepage). L337 kybldmstr 00:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete and Salt. Wow! An article for an organization of 30 people whose official Web site is a subpage of a subpage of a discussion group. --Blanchardb 00:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I just noticed that the author of the article, Jah1991 has contributed only to that one article, and also recreated it. So, it may be a G11 (blatant advertising) as well after all. L337 kybldmstr 00:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closing admin: if deleted, please remove the reference to this article in the MWA disambiguation page. --Blanchardb 01:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt. No assertion of notability. The purpose of the organization, as stated in the article, is "supporting the welfare of the players." And so we have the possibility that the article's sole purpose is self-promotion and the recreation of the article ~~repeatedly~~ 9once only recreated once. This suggests that the creator will simply recreate the article out of ignorance of our policies or out of disdain for them. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 02:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt all four walls. NN, no possibility of proving notablity. SkierRMH 02:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, absolutely non-notable. Doctorfluffy 06:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Placed tag requesting speedy deletion on article. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 14:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.