- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:56, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- MyBank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:NCORP, no independent sources establishing notability. Tgeairn (talk) 19:56, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added references, give them a review. --VI-007 (talk) 15:02, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'd argue for a redirect to Summit Bank (which it was merged into two years ago), but that article is even worse, just a one-liner saying 'this is a bank in Pakistan run by Husain Lawai'. Both need major WP:RESCUEs to get to even a weak keep. Nate • (chatter) 02:43, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: I disagree on Redirect to Summit Bank. Boeing Bought McDonnell Douglas in 1997 We still have its history, should i mark it for redirection to Boeing? I think for encyclopaedia sake we should improve this article, add more information in and keep it for users. --VI-007 (talk) 22:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The big difference is that your example had companies in business for generations. This company was in business for less than six years, and I'm doubtful that Summit Bank is on the level of HSBC, much less even a Regions Bank in their market. Nate • (chatter) 23:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think wikipedia does not care about the age of an organisation, all it care about is "NOTABILITY". Summit Bank is a famous bank in Pakistan where as HSBC has less than 50 branches Pakistan wide, indeed it is a big bank in other countries. --VI-007 (talk) 15:04, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- A sixteen-word article suggests that it doesn't have the reach of any national bank, and MyBank seems like a 'jump on that internet gimmick thing bank' that pretty much was acquired solely to get those customers into another small bank. Nate • (chatter) 01:40, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think wikipedia does not care about the age of an organisation, all it care about is "NOTABILITY". Summit Bank is a famous bank in Pakistan where as HSBC has less than 50 branches Pakistan wide, indeed it is a big bank in other countries. --VI-007 (talk) 15:04, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The big difference is that your example had companies in business for generations. This company was in business for less than six years, and I'm doubtful that Summit Bank is on the level of HSBC, much less even a Regions Bank in their market. Nate • (chatter) 23:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: this article is encyclopedic in nature and should be kept for reference.--Enlightinggemini (talk) 17:18, 21 September 2013 (UTC) This user is a confirmed sockpuppet of Viii007. --SMS Talk 12:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC) Comment struck. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:45, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:34, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- merge with Summit bank, which is usually how we cover predecessor companies. DGG ( talk ) 22:29, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.