Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naan Evarukkum Aattathavan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Naan Evarukkum Aattathavan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no sources for this film that is supposed to start in October with a release date next year some time, Prod was removed GB fan 15:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article is a mess. No sources. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. There is a lot of sockpuppetry going on with the article and related articles, too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

actor:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

music:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete for now for being TOO SOON. Definitely written by an editor unfamiliar with MOS:FILM, it is purported that audio will have a release later in 2013 and that the film will begin production in 2014. It is strange that the article shares a film length for an unmade film. Until we have sources speaking about this project, it fails WP:NF and sub-guideline WP:NFF. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A complete mess of an article. If this article's subject is notable enough, it would be rewritten after its deletion by someone competent on the topic AND Wikipedia guidelines. Therefore, no loss in deleting this. Ithinkicahn (talk) 14:08, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.