Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New England Brokerage Corp. (NEBC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- New England Brokerage Corp. (NEBC) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No references and no clear assertion of notability. More than half of the article is focussed on a subsidiary part of the organisation. Most of the content is vague and uninformative. Tone is somewhat promotional. DanielRigal (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: The author has now removed the vague and promotional sections and the article now could be considered a valid stub. None the less, we still need a reference for notability. If that can be provided then I will withdraw the deletion nomination. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977Talk to meMy edits 07:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I would think that a "boutique" bank would be inherently non-notable. Only ref is the company's website. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 02:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am the author of this page and am in agreement with the proposed deletion. Qwert87 (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.