Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nilanjanaa Jayant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 18:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nilanjanaa Jayant

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like case of WP:TOOSOON and WP:ONEEVENT. Kinda failing WP:GNG and only one thing that may pass WP:MUSBIO - winning "Golden voice of America". The problem with this is that, I can't find any independant reference of this competition outside of contest, related to her. [1] Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC) Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is not enough coverage in reliable sources to determine notability. The subject seems to have won the Golden voice of America award, which in my understanding is not a "major music award", failing WP:MUSBIO. She is supposed to perform once at Carnegie Hall in October 2016 which is not a notable event. Past performances at other events do not help the case either as those events too are not significant in itself and the fact that she even performed there remains unreferenced. Ya sh ! 23:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:MUSBIO. Probably she'll be notable enough to merit an article in future, but now is too soon. utcursch | talk 17:49, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.