Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Express

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge/redirect to Futurama. I will merely redirect and leave merging to those interested. Mango juice^talk 03:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Planet Express

The article is not notable, and has no references to verify its contents. As such, it is just an in-universe repetition of various plot facts from Futurama episode articles, and is totally duplicative of those articles. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Again, if it is important to the show, it should be discussed in their articles, which it already is. Not notable outside the scope of the show. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:40, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and reference better to episodes The top 100 Wikipedia searches are for information on movies and television episodes. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 07:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. — Hiding T 11:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge meaningful content with Futurama if sources are not found to prove notability. Will ^(talk) 12:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Futurama and Redirect. Doc Strange (talk) 14:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge most to the content is speculative, or OR, merge the savageable content with Futurama or Planet Express Ship.-- danntm ^T _C 16:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Futurama. - Chardish (talk) 17:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge & redirect There really isn't enough extra info to justify having its own article. --Rodhullandemu (please reply here - contribs) 18:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per WP:FICT and WP:SIZE, this is clearly a sub-article whose contents would make the main Futurama article too long and stylistically awkward. Trying to merge it would screw up the content here and in the main article. Torc2 (talk) 22:54, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Trim/Merge/Redirect as it fails to have any significant real world sources. RMHED (talk) 01:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as Planet Express is a notable fictional business from a popular TV series that has been adapted into a DVD movie and multi-system video game. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it has no references its not notable. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this. Regards, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely nothing, just like the other google results you've posted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect without merge unless this fictional topic can be substantiated by real-world context. There's no need to shift inappropriate plot information if it isn't going to have any context. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge ON ONE CONDITION - Notability does cover things that appear in shows themselves and may not necessarily be written down or you'd have to take down every episode and plot synopsis that appears in wikipedia. The one condition for merges is that someone who merges the page actually does their frakking job for once and creates a "Planet Express" section in the merge target page! - 202.10.80.69 (talk) 00:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.