Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primary Succession Recapitulates Phylogeny
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Primary Succession Recapitulates Phylogeny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is based on a paper written by Felix Bast, who agrees that he is the author of both the paper and the article. The one citation is therefore not independent, and is indeed subject to conflict of interest. There is no reliable, independent support, so the topic is not notable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete besides the fact that this is not notable, this is not salvageable due to it's complexity if it was, and it's an Autobiography. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 19:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I was unable to find any independent sources for this theory and the paper itself doesn't show any citations in GScholar. Hence it fails WP:GNG. --Mark viking (talk) 20:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing at all suggesting the necessary notability improvements. SwisterTwister talk 05:11, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.