Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro-eating disorder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pro-ana and delete history per consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pro-eating disorder

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advocacy article, contested PROD. While there might be an article for this title, this isn't it. Acroterion (talk) 21:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete an essay, not an encyclopedia article. Mangoe (talk) 22:25, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 00:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 00:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Opinion/original research. --MelanieN (talk) 14:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Pro-ana. Pro-ana already covers almost all of the material in this entry. Pro-mia redirects to pro-ana, (I thought they were separate pages) so there's no reason that this can't redirect to Pro-ana as well. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:24, 30 September 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.