- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Radical Matters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Only one of the artists has an article. The creator also has a conflict of interest. Fails WP:CORP. Schuym1 (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet the criteria for notability of organizations and companies as it doesn't appear to have been the subject of multiple, secondary sources (Google News: [1][2][3]). Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails notability guideline for companies. – Alex43223 T | C | E 00:53, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete per gsearch and Amazon search; exists, mudboy is their only artist with a WP page, and Amazon lists him with a discontinued CD from Kock, not Radical Matters. Unconvicned of notability of this label. JJL (talk) 01:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as per Nom. NZ forever (talk) 02:37, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.