Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabal Singh Bhati (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sabal Singh Bhati

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was tagged as a CSD G4 but when I looked at the previous version it was different from the current version. However, this version is equally promotional and I don't believe it meets WP:GNG so I'm renominating it. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and India. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete reporting doing his job, sources given are just confirmation of that. Oaktree b (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agreed, reporter doing their job. (one among many) Flibbertigibbets (talk) 01:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As the users said above. LordVoldemort728 (talk) 07:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:32, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The references are mostly blatant puff-pieces, most if not all of them not independent sources, and several of them not even substantially about him. They don't even begin to show notability in Wikipedia's sense of the word.JBW (talk) 19:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/171439059/

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/rti-activist-attacked-in-barmer-referred-to-a-hospital-in-jodhpur/articleshow/94905657.cms

just check all of independent sources Dashrath (talk) 17:38, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.