Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salim Suliman Al Harbi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Der yck C. 11:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salim Suliman Al Harbi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On a living (now released) prisoner from Guantanamo Fails WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:BIO. There are no secondary sources or independent coverage to claim notability of the subject. The citation used are WP:PRIMARY sources (WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 84#Reliability of US military summary reports) DBig Xray 21:46, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating again as the previous nomination was closed as "no consensus" due to bundling and the closing admin had advised to nominate again individually.--DBig Xray 21:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. 02:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. 02:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 02:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - individual subject lacks "significant coverage" in reliable sources and as such is not notable under WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 05:38, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay per WP:R#HARMFUL and WP:R#KEEP.--Joshuaism (talk) 20:03, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, & WP:CRIMINAL. Subject of article has not received significant coverage in reliable sources to pass notability per the guidelines that I have listed. If one wishes to contest the deletion, a redirect can be left in the article space to Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:04, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay per Joshuaism - notable as part of the group, at least enough to be mentioned in the list, but not enough to merit an individual article. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:12, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.