Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scouting in Cumbria
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (closed by non-admin) as per consensus. RMHED 16:05, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Scouting in Cumbria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I seem to recall that there was a policy against local chapters of larger organisations having their own pages. In any case, the article says that there is scouting in Cumbria, then provides us with links to outside websites for the various chapters, which I know is against Wikipedia policy. Nothing on the page suggests anything at all notable. Fee Fi Foe Fum 08:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep We avoid articles for individual units, but an article for the regional umbrella boddy is OK Mayalld 17:35, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Mayalld --Tagishsimon (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 18:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The consensus developed over a couple of years is that there can be articles on the Scouting unit below the national level. In the US and Australia this means States and in the UK it means Counties. Local chapters (although the term Chapter is never used, at least in UK Scouting) are the individual Scout Groups or Troops and articles on these have been deleted or merged into articles on States or Counties. This has also happened for Scout Districts, individual Gang Shows and so on. The Scouting Project keeps a close eye on these matters. --Bduke 21:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keepper all the above. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:12, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy keep-there is an article on every Scout county in England, that's not a local chapter, that's a regional org. Chris 22:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The guideline in question is Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), specifically:
Individual chapters of national and international organizations are usually not notable enough to warrant a separate article unless sufficient notability is established through reliable sources. However, chapter information may be included in list articles as long as only verifiable information is included.
- The Scouting Project guideline at Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/MOS#Non-national articles is derived from the WP guideline. --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 00:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Mayalld -Phips 14:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep --evrik (talk) 22:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.