Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smintair (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — ΛΧΣ21™ 20:15, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smintair

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was a proposed airline was supposed to start operations in 2007, since then nothing has happened. No indication of meeting notability guidelines, Google searches not finding any significant coverage. JetBlast (talk) 21:12, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Tris2000 in the previous AfD. There's plenty of significant coverage in independent RSs (WP:CORPDEPTH), including the BBC, NY Times, CNN, and the Washington Post. Notability is not temporary, and the fact that the company failed doesn't make it less notable. Braincricket (talk) 08:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious Keep – Passes WP:GNG: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Plenty of indication of passing notability guidelines. Please read section D of WP:BEFORE prior to nominating more articles for deletion. Simply opening the Google News archive link at the top of this discussion yields plenty of sources that consist of significant coverage about this topic. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:00, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SNOW Keep per an abundance of reliable sources from braincricket and NA1000. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 07:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.