Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten Most Wanted (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Joey Yung. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Most Wanted (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced for nearly five years. Appears to fail WP:N and WP:NALBUMS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Joey Yung, as per the guidelines at WP:NALBUM. I'm not seeing any significant coverage in reliable sources that would confirm this album notability enough for a stand-alone article (although if someone comes up with some good Cantonese sources and a half-decent translation I could be swayed). Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 03:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have fixed the interwiki link, and you can now see the corresponding Chinese article, which lists 5 awards. Olivier (talk) 13:17, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notability has to be judged from Awards. User:Dylanfromthenorth, what Chinese print sources for any Chinese album are online? In ictu oculi (talk) 00:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- No idea, I don't read Cantonese, I was saying if anyone comes up with some I could be swayed towards a keep. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 04:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - So here is a half-decent translation of the Chinese article : [1]. Olivier (talk) 01:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - There are no sources in the Chinese article - what I'm after are sources that prove the notability of the album as per WP:NALBUM. They can be online, offline, English, Cantonese, Urdu, Klingon - it doesn't matter. But without sources there shouldn't be an article. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 01:47, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      - WP:NOREFS is a good read. "Simply having no references on the page may not be grounds for deletion; you will have to demonstrate that none can ever likely be found". Olivier (talk) 19:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        I haven't advocated deletion, I've advocated a redirect. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 19:39, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        I too didn't nominate it for not having refs, rather for apparently not meeting WP:N and WP:NALBUMS. If you have refs, supply them. I couldn't find any. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:59, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        Refs would be in Cantonese, and that's certainly not the best place to ask for them. My Cantonese is poor and my Klingon nonexistent. I don't believe that deletion or a mere redirect would in this case improve the state of Wikipedia. But a merger would: material from the article could be merged into Joey Yung discography for instance. A good example of such a full discography is surprisingly the corresponding French article. If someone offers to move the content of the "Ten Most Wanted" article to "Joey Yung discography", then I am perfectly fine with that. If the suggestion is to delete or hide (mere redirect) the content, then I would rather see the article stay for the time being. Olivier (talk) 20:20, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 21:33, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.