Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The gypsy queens
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:13, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The gypsy queens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prodded for not meeting N (MUSIC) but prod was removed. DGG ( talk ) 01:42, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:39, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, looks like a textbook WP:TOOSOON. No sources yet, no album yet. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:50, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Cairns, Dan (20 November 2011), "Killer QUEENS", The Sunday Times is a substantial article about them. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:12, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: That's one good source. But I can't find any other independent, verfiable sources and don't think it meets WP:GNG.Jimsteele9999 (talk) 01:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:TOOSOON and it fails WP:MUSICBIO. Bleubeatle (talk) 07:49, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.