Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheelock Place

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 14:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wheelock Place

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

prod contested without improvement - no indication why the building is notable; one primary source citation. Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 07:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A part of the article has been deleted. An editor removed the content, citing WP:CHALLENGED. I'd prefer to look for sources, you can find a lot of coverage here. The article is in my opinion fixable/expandable. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep is one of the less interesting buildings by Kisho Kurokawa 1, however it passes the current very low threshold of notability for buildings. It marks an important junction in central Singapore. --ELEKHH^T 16:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Googling the Chinese name reveals lots of results. Enough coverage IMO to pass WP:N. --B music ian 11:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.