Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wildebeest (comics)
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2013 January 21. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Wildebeest (comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable fictional character. Simone (talk) 18:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: He appeared in two episodes of a popular cartoon series and also appeared in a video game. SL93 (talk) 22:04, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:49, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:49, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The fictional characters do not meet the general notability guideline since there is no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Without reliable secondary sources that make analytic or evaluative claims about the fictional characters, the article can only be a summary-only description of a fictional work with a trivia-like section of appearances in other media. The content of the article itself is only referenced with primary sources, so it doesn't show why the fictional characters are notable or deserve a stand-alone article. A search engine test doesn't show anything to presume that the subject of the article is appropriate for Wikipedia. Jfgslo (talk) 05:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:00, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete does not meet the general notability guideline due to lack of sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.