Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2015 April 2

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
edit
  • Okay, Justlettersandnumbers, as we have just entered into another month that starts with "A", I have stopped running from the hard stuff and taken a look at this, and it makes me uneasy. I see issues, yes, but I'm not sure about a CCI. I've found issues in Port Bonython oil spill, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission, Silex Systems, Smith & Nasht, and Ian Henschke - a high percentage of articles I looked at, but some of the issues were quite minor and others were potentially a one-off misunderstanding of government copyright. :( I could use a second opinion here. I hate to list it at WP:CCI if it's not really necessary, given the backlog there. I'm not sure who best to ask right now; any suggestions? (I went straight down the contribution surveyor to Brian Jeffries, checking Earwig Copyvio Bot compares to sources.) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:10, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry, Moonriddengirl, I did see this but forgot to reply... I thought there was enough of concern to mention it here, and I see that you at least partly share that concern; whether it's enough to justify requesting a CCI I just don't know – I do note that the editor is aware of past problems and intends to mend his/her ways. For another opinion on the CCI question I personally would choose to ask Diannaa, who's been battling so valiantly with the CCI backlog. It certainly would be good to be shot of this day. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time to look, Diannaa; and that's good news. What continues to bother me is that even if he/she has stopped, there may be quite a number of problems in the past. I've just now chosen one single article at random from the contribs: David Klingberg; I found an unacceptable level of copying, and have listed it here under today's date. Taken with the other problems already identified, that has convinced me that a CCI would be advisable. In that light, do you and/or Moonriddengirl agree? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree there is enough to open a case, but I cannot commit to working on it anytime soon. -- Diannaa (talk) 22:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't heard from the editor after I asked him about which articles were likely violations, so it looks like we're going to have to do this the hard way. MER-C 12:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, MER-C. CCI requested here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:45, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Revdelete request added for admin attention. I've gone through most of this editor's non-trivial edits, and removed copyvio in a good number of recent articles. I think I got it all, but would be happy if someone would take a quick look to be sure. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]