Welcome to In the news. Please read the guidelines. Admin instructions are here. |
In the news toolbox |
---|
This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.
This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.
view — page history — related changes — edit |
Glossaryedit
All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality. Nomination stepsedit
The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.
Headersedit
Voicing an opinion on an itemeditFormat your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated. Please do...edit
Please do not...edit
Suggesting updateseditThere are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:
|
Archives
editArchives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives
Sections
editThis page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.
November 30
edit
November 30, 2024
(Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
|
November 29
edit
November 29, 2024
(Friday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Politics and elections
|
2024 Georgian pro-European protests
editBlurb: Protests erupt in Georgia after its government formally announces the country will no longer pursue EU membership. (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:
- Created and nominated by Abcmaxx (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Nominating to draw attention to it, this will likely be ongoing for a very long time given EU accession is enshrined in the country's constitution and that the falsified elections weren't overturned. Previous protests werent posted only because the article wasn't made in time and it failed on quality, although since has been expanded, hoping for help of others on this to avoid the sane fate. Abcmaxx (talk) 23:16, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality. Article is currently too short to post. Gelasin (talk) 23:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose unless these protests escalate to something more serious. The article is currently very short to provide any detailed information.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:06, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would reword the blurb as "... formally announces the country will suspend its application for EU membership". According to this article, the PM said that the negotiations were on hold until the end of 2028, but that the government would still aim for EU membership by 2030; maybe one could cynically claim that this amounts to the same thing in practice, but let's stick to what the government "formally announced".
- I agree that the stub as it currently stands is obviously not sufficient to post. I would be open to supporting based on significance, but it's still a bit early to judge how important these protests will end up being. Does anyone know how many protesters there are/were, for one basic metric? The sources I've found just say "thousands". 98.170.164.88 (talk) 01:15, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose unless some escalation in protests will happen. So far nothing serious is happened yet. Btw Georgia's EU accession process was suspended in July[1]. Currently government just formally accept reality that in near future accession is unlikely. But main goal to join EU in 2030 is still not abandoned. 46.188.18.196 (talk) 02:09, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Notre-Dame reopening
editBlurb: The Notre-Dame cathedral (pictured in 2024) in Paris reopens following reconstruction in the wake of the 2019 fire. (Post)
News source(s): AP, CNN, WasPost
Credits:
- Nominated by Masem (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: The fire artricle is in good shape, and we could also link the cathedral itself (I only see a couple tagged things). That said, while the official opening to the public is next week on the 7th, Macron gave a large, widely-covered tour today to unveil the new interior prior to that opening. I can see holding off until next week to post, but I think we're getting the bigger coverage now (and given the dates, we're past the CRYSTAL point and the opening has little likelihood of not happening). It would be nice to get new interior pictures but I believe those will be subject to copyright, and I don't see any immediately new image of the cathedral in the last couple months, post-reconstruction. Masem (t) 17:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above but suggest making Notre Dame the target rather than the fire This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 17:25, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support when the event occurs, that is support but wait until it actually occurs. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The article mentions that it’s planned to be re-opened on the weekend of 7-8 December. So, it’s too soon.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- As I said, there's a lot media coverage today with Macron's tour of it. We could wait but it will be unclear which point will have the most coverage. — Masem (t) 18:25, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, as the reopening is scheduled for next weekend. (I've just reverted changes to the main Notre Dame de Paris article wrongly claiming it's open.) GenevieveDEon (talk) 18:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose and close for now per all above. No comment on notability or quality. Departure– (talk) 19:14, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support one of the main monuments of western civilization opening after several years after it's fire. Scuba 21:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 22:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose We're not posting future news, even if they're beyond WP:CRYSTAL. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for now until it actually reopens. Gelasin (talk) 22:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- To any non-involved party: Consensus appears to be to close until Notre-Dame actually re-opens, with overall consensus trending towards support, but an early close here appears likely. I've seen no arguments for posting this now so a non-involved party closing this would be appreciated, barring any dissidence towards this early closure. I'd do it myself, but we're still a few steps short of a snowstorm. Departure– (talk) 22:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Big historical landmark. Officially open to all guests. People are wrongly claiming it’s not open yet. Also, can somebody suggest the Irish election for tomorrow? 68.160.249.84 (talk) 01:24, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is going by the December date when the public will be allowed to visit, and we have reliable sources stating that. Also, we don't prematurely nominate elections - especially ones with specific winners and parties that hold onto, gain, or lose power in government. Departure– (talk) 01:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Von der Leyen Commission II
editBlurb: The European Parliament confirms the new European Commission led by Ursula Von der Leyen (pictured). (Post)
News source(s): Deutsche Welle
Credits:
- Nominated by Sandstein (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: New supranational government, in office until 2029, of political significance equal to a change of national government. Will take office on 1 December 2024. Sandstein 10:14, 29 November 2024 (UTC) Sandstein 10:14, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The Barroso Commission (2004) and the Juncker Commission (2014) were featured on ITN. It looks like the first Von der Leyen Commission (2019) wasn't, probably because nobody thought to nominate it. I
wouldmight support making this ITN/R. 98.170.164.88 (talk) 10:34, 29 November 2024 (UTC) - Oppose The right news to post was her re-election in the same way we posted her election in 2019. This is just a routine change within the European Commission. Across individual countries, we generally post parliamentary election results, not when the government is officially formed and the cabinet is complete.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:37, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, we didn't post her re-election this year (see ITN/C discussion), so maybe posting the commission formation would in some sense make up for that omission. 98.170.164.88 (talk) 11:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- ITN often disagrees on when to post a change in head of government (which this is too, technically, as Von der Leyen will also commence her new term of office). We oscillate between posting the election or the assumption of the office. But that's not a reason not to post on either occasion, as long as we agree that the story is important. Sandstein 15:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- This will set a precedent to post similar stories in the future. Let’s not open a can of worms.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- ITN often disagrees on when to post a change in head of government (which this is too, technically, as Von der Leyen will also commence her new term of office). We oscillate between posting the election or the assumption of the office. But that's not a reason not to post on either occasion, as long as we agree that the story is important. Sandstein 15:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, we didn't post her re-election this year (see ITN/C discussion), so maybe posting the commission formation would in some sense make up for that omission. 98.170.164.88 (talk) 11:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Obviously. Per suprationalisms. SerialNumber54129 11:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article looks good enough. Seeing how we posted Juncker and Barroso commissions taking effect, we should follow precedent. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 11:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quite a good article. Given we bizarrely failed to post Von der Leyen's re-election we should definitely post this. The European Commission is one of the most powerful bodies in the world, and uniquely powerful for a supranational union. AusLondonder (talk) 13:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- By the same logic, we should post Second cabinet of Donald Trump's confirmation by the United States Senate, right?--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- eh...no? The United States is not an international political, economic and monetary union. What an absurd comparison. _-_Alsor (talk) 15:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- The United States is politically and economically more powerful, influential and independent than the European Union. Moreover, we don't have a rule that supranational unions should be assigned more significance. That being said, a supranational union isn't a valid argument to support this.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- By the same logic. At least they were demonstrating some; your argument ("Go USA", fauxcomparatives etc) possesses a certain paucity in that department. SerialNumber54129
- I don’t admire the US at all, but I can’t deny the facts (I didn’t tell the IMF and World Bank that US should have 50% higher GDP than the EU). You’re welcome to elaborate what is EU’s real power that makes it significant (maybe Germany going into recession after imposing sanctions against Russia?). People here should divorce from their emotions that the EU is the greatest and most influential thing that ever happened in the world. Yes, it was initially a peaceful project between the European nations with the goal of uniting Europe, but it eventually ended up in a union propagating the non-sense that the largest country in Europe is actually not European. For what it’s worth, I’m European.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- By the same logic. At least they were demonstrating some; your argument ("Go USA", fauxcomparatives etc) possesses a certain paucity in that department. SerialNumber54129
- The United States is politically and economically more powerful, influential and independent than the European Union. Moreover, we don't have a rule that supranational unions should be assigned more significance. That being said, a supranational union isn't a valid argument to support this.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- eh...no? The United States is not an international political, economic and monetary union. What an absurd comparison. _-_Alsor (talk) 15:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- By the same logic, we should post Second cabinet of Donald Trump's confirmation by the United States Senate, right?--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - This is a purely procedural matter. Kiril is right that her election was the thing to post; we could have posted her re-election too, but the fact that we didn't isn't by itself justification for posting this lesser event. GenevieveDEon (talk) 14:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Kiril and Genevieve; the window for posting was when the election occurred, not at the time when the term actually started. It would be a slippery slope to allow "oh, we missed it, lets post here instead"-type logic for ITNR items (which I am pretty sure the election would have been treated as). --Masem (t) 14:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- This misses the point that this is actually a notable story anyway with a good article that's in the news. AusLondonder (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- All articles related to UK and US politics are in very good shape. It doesn't mean that we should make concessions to post similar procedural events there.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also, this article isn't in good shape- it has way too many tables compared to text content, and is orange tagged for section needing update. And it's based on an election event that is stale. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- All articles related to UK and US politics are in very good shape. It doesn't mean that we should make concessions to post similar procedural events there.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- This misses the point that this is actually a notable story anyway with a good article that's in the news. AusLondonder (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per TDKR Chicago 101. It was a failure not to post von der Leyen's election, so we can repair it with the election of the commission, its quasi von der Leyen's inauguration. Grimes2 (talk) 15:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as stale, the election was the event to post. Also, this article fails WP:ITNQUALITY by having an overkill of tabled content compares to prose. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as we usually don't post about government formation of ministers, just heads of state and government.
- Oppose We should have posted her election, but this is less important and as such I cannot support posting it. Gelasin (talk) 22:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
November 28
edit
November 28, 2024
(Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
RD: Silvia Pinal
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian, USA Today, CNN
Credits:
- Nominated by Mr. Lechkar (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Actor of the Mexican Golden Age film era. Mr. Lechkar (talk) 00:50, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) Northwestern Syria offensive (2024)
editBlurb: The Syrian opposition launches an offensive for the first time since the 2020 ceasefire. (Post)
Alternative blurb: The Syrian opposition enters Aleppo in the first offensive since the 2020 ceasefire.
Alternative blurb II: Turkish-backed militants enter Aleppo, Syria in the the first offensive since the 2020 ceasefire.
News source(s): CNNAP The Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by Scu ba (talk · give credit)
- Created by Ecrusized (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: First major offensive since the 2020 ceasefire, over 25 villages and towns taken, the rebels are also at the door of Aleppo again. We might want to also add this to ongoing. Scuba 15:15, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as this is the war’s first major flare-up in as long as I can remember. Don’t think we should put in ongoing for now, though. The Kip (contribs) 16:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support first big offensive in 4 years, reasonable to post, agree with kip on not doing ongoing Ion.want.uu (talk) 17:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support notable offensive, first in a long time Personisinsterest (talk) 18:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support first major development in the Syrian Civil War since the 2020 ceasefire. Aydoh8[contribs] 03:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Support major worldwide news. Article is well sourced. INeedSupport :3 03:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Altblurb I as it shows where the offensive took place. INeedSupport :3 23:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not convinced by the significance of the attack. Largely it maybe considered a spillover of the Israel–Hamas war in Syria and while this might be the first large scale offensive since 2020, clashes did not definitely cease as indicated by the presence of Northwestern Syria clashes (December 2022–November 2024). The Syrian civil never stopped and while this could be its next major phase, that is not definitive as of now. Gotitbro (talk) 07:25, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Those clashes saw fighting for a single village, this offensive has seen the rebels capture 40+ villages, 2 cities, a military base, and are again in Aleppo, one of the major cities of Syria. They aren't really comparable. Scuba 15:05, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wait. While this is indeed a re-escalation of the fighting, the amount of territory retaken is fairly small so far. If the opposition forces recapture Aleppo, I think that would be significant enough to post; a few towns on the approaches to the city are not. Let's see how this plays out before posting anything. Modest Genius talk 12:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- We now have a page for the fighting in Aleppo, rebels are still making progress there and are capturing chunks of the city. Scuba 14:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Even more reason to wait a day or two, to see if the city changes hands. Modest Genius talk 18:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, they took the citadel today, the main SAA-Hezbollah-IRGC HQ in the center of the city. Only real resistance is coming from the kurds in the Sheikh Maqsoud neighbourhood. All government buildings, including the police HQ have been taken. Scuba 23:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Even more reason to wait a day or two, to see if the city changes hands. Modest Genius talk 18:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- We now have a page for the fighting in Aleppo, rebels are still making progress there and are capturing chunks of the city. Scuba 14:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Finally, an actual development in this war since forever. Setarip (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above TheHiddenCity (talk) 13:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mainly due to the sheer amount of land recaptured (cf General Melchett's 1:1 scale map: 'It's very detailed; look, there's a little worm'). SerialNumber54129 13:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support First major offensive in the War in a while, definitely not covered by ongoing anymore and article is in good shape. Editor 5426387 (talk) 17:32, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Major offensive - warrants it's place in ITN The AP (talk) 17:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wait and recenter nomination on Aleppo in case it falls. I feel this is only making major headlines now that the opposition is in the outskirts of Aleppo. Would be worth waiting if the city falls - that would certainly be major news. Khuft (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- The blurb could always be updated if that happens. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 21:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support, Syrian rebels are currently inside Aleppo. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – significant coverage on AP, WP, and NYT of a significant development in the Syrian War. ArkHyena (it/its) 22:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support altblurb 1 or a new blurb referencing that they claim half the city and the center of government, things are moving fast Omnifalcon (talk) 01:20, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Alt1. SpencerT•C 06:15, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
RD: Tom Hughes (Australian politician)
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Sydney Morning Herald
Credits:
- Nominated by Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Australian barrister and politician Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support only one cn tag. Scuba 15:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
RD: Prince Johnson
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:
- Nominated by Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Liberian warlord Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:34, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- oppose 7 cn tags, article needs work. Scuba 15:26, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) Ongoing removal: Israeli Invasion of Lebanon
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Nominator's comments: Ceasefire was signed. Interstellarity (talk) 14:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would at least wait a few days, letting the ceasefire news stabilize for a bit, as well as to actually make sure the ceasefire holds. Also, as this is only a 60-day ceasefire, we may need to be prepared to readd it in late Jan/early Feb. if hostilies immediately flare back up. --Masem (t) 14:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wait for 60 days. There are still Israeli soldiers in Lebanon. Grimes2 (talk) 14:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Israel is still prohibiting the return of Lebanese civilians, and has threatened to pick up hostilities again. We should wait and see if they're serious about the ceasefire. Scuba 15:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wait for a few more days to see if things definitively hold. The Kip (contribs) 16:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Was thinking of nominating myself. It's a complete contradiction to say in the top headline there's a ceasefire, while also saying it's "ongoing". Makes us look silly. If hostilities break out again it's easy enough to re-add it. — Amakuru (talk) 17:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- We don't say there is a ceasefire, but rather that Israel and Lebanon agreed to one. Secondly, ceasefires can happen during invasions: eg see 2023 Israel–Hamas ceasefire amid the Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip.VR (Please ping on reply) 20:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn’t look like Israel is stopping air strikes so sure there was a ceasefire, Israel is just breaking it now. Scuba 17:34, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Calling it an invasion was a bit of hyperbole in the first place anyway. Khuft (talk) 18:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There are Israeli troops on the ground still and alleged violations of the ceasefire
- Personisinsterest (talk) 20:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: there was an airstrike today. Israel interprets the "ceasefire" agreement that allows it to continue attacking Lebanon. Israeli troops are still inside Lebanon and preventing Lebanese from returning home[2].VR (Please ping on reply) 20:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Both Israel and Hezbollah are supposedly violating the ceasefire agreement, with Israel yet to withdraw troops. [3] [4] Aydoh8[contribs] 03:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 60 days is not a lot of time for a ceasefire. Anything can happen within those 60 days and tensions are still high. If it becomes more permanent, then I support removal. INeedSupport :3 03:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Israeli troops are yet to be called back - and there are also alleged violations of the ceasefire The AP (talk) 09:34, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
RD: Ananda Krishnan
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:E494:F12F:1DF4:BC0B (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Malaysian business mogul and founder of Usaha Tegas. 240F:7A:6253:1:E494:F12F:1DF4:BC0B (talk) 12:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Career section orange tagged as it is entirely unsourced. Scuba 15:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
November 27
edit
November 27, 2024
(Wednesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Arts and culture
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
(Withdrawn) ICC arrest warrant for Min Aung Hlaing
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: The International Criminal Court issues an arrest warrant for Burmese military junta leader Min Aung Hlaing in its investigation of the Rohingya genocide (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by Nice4What (talk · give credit)
- Support weird that they would only investigate Hlaing, instead of any of the people in office at the time. Scuba 15:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Huge support very notable and worthy, surprised they didn’t issue warrants for previous leaders for the genocide Ion.want.uu (talk) 16:05, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, obviously. Article needs updating: does not currently mention it. Tight faded male arse. Decadence and anarchy. A certain style. Smile. 16:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality per above. Article needs to be updated.
Otherwise I support on notability. We've effectively established by precedent that ICC arrest warrants for world leaders are ITN-worthy, and Aung Hlaing is the de facto head of state of Myanmar. FlipandFlopped ツ 16:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Striking my support on notability - took too much faith that the original blurb was accurate when this is apparently not the case. FlipandFlopped ツ 19:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support on notability.VR (Please ping on reply) 17:43, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The source listed above says plainly that "the chief prosecutor of the international criminal court (ICC) is seeking an arrest warrant ... A panel of three ICC judges must now rule on the prosecutor’s request." So, an arrest warrant has not yet been issued. This is the second recent example of failure to get the basic facts right. Tsk. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Andrew. This was the same case with the warrants for the Israeli leaders - they submitted a request mid-year, and it was only granted in the last month. --Masem (t) 17:52, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose "seeks arrest warrant" is not the same as issuing an arrest warrant. Natg 19 (talk) 17:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Andrew. We should wait until a warrant is formally granted. The Kip (contribs) 19:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
2024 WBSC Premier12 Championship
editBlurb: In baseball, Chinese Taipei wins the 2024 WBSC Premier12. (Post)
News source(s): Al Jazeera RFi AFP Reuters
Credits:
- Nominated by Meganinja202 (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
Meganinja202 (talk) 08:06, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- This is not in WP:ITNR. I'm unmarking that.—Bagumba (talk) 08:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- No problem, I am not used with templates, so i added that by accident Meganinja202 (talk) 08:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. This article needs a game summary for this. Moraljaya67 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 11:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Importance is unclear; article contains practically no prose. Black Kite (talk) 12:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose both on quality and importance. The article has almost no prose, just tables and lists. This is a new competition (only the third time held) with highly questionable significance. The previous edition was held five years ago and was merely a qualifying process for baseball at the Olympics. This year's rosters are full of minor league and free agent players; players in the world's top leagues did not take part. There seems to have been little interest from broadcasters or mainstream media. I don't see a case for posting this, let alone adding it to ITNR (as proposed on the talk page). Modest Genius talk 13:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Players in the world's non-MLB top leagues did took part, it had players from NPB, KBO, CPBL, Venezuela Winter League Mexican Summer and Winter leaguesk, not mentioning MLB prospects and former players such as Didi Gregorius.
- Broadcasting wise, the tournament had deals for TV (including Free to Air) in Asia and Central America, for outside those regions had a global deal with DAZN.
- While most USA media seems that had not covered beacuse isnt MLB (as the bias you seems to show), the tournament was covered by local TV/media of the participating countries and reigion agencies such as Kyodo News and Yonhap News Agency . Meganinja202 (talk) 19:08, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- More Japanese tuned in on the 2024 World Series mid-morning to watch Shohei Ohtani than this tournament.
- More Japanese tuned in to watch the 2024 Japan Series as well. I'm interested as the Japan roster includes players that were participating in the Climax Series and the aforementioned Japan Series. Did players like Ryoya Kurihara play in here as well? Howard the Duck (talk) 02:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, some players that played in Climax Series and Japan Series were in 2024 WBSC Premier12 rosters , not just Ryoya Kurihara, but also Chusei Mannami and Shugo Maki (a BayStars capitan that played in 2023 WBC) was there. Althoout Premier12 is mostly used to test new players for the next WBC.
- Ohtani is by far is the most popular Japanese player right now so anything with him on it will surpass something that has not, 2023 Word Baseball Classic Final was more popular than 2023 World Series there, this year all World Series games were shown in FTA TV only beacuse Ohtani was on it, most of years those games are thrown into NHK BS only and often cut out by BS programing.
- As Premier12 ratings, they were above average even with Prime Video Sports showing it, a exemple was that the final match had over 17% average nad top 21% in Japan meanwhile, one of the Samurai Japan soccer teams before P12 was 15% average with 17% top., as reference, any rating above 10% is considered good rating in Japan nowadays. Meganinja202 (talk) 06:15, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment have we posted this championship before for other years? Scuba 15:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- No, because it's not important enough to do so. Black Kite (talk) 18:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- But all significant posted events needed a first at some point. —Bagumba (talk) 19:59, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like this has been a thing since 2015, can't claim it's a new thing that just needs to be normalized. Scuba 23:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- it is a new tournament but is already stabilized, Baseball went various reforms during last decade, World Baseball Classic replacing the old Baseball World Cup and becoming main major international championship alongside the creation of Premier12 as the replacement of the old Intercontinental Cup.
- as mentioned before it was so much of success that was used as olympic qualifier and is the event that gives more points for the WBSC World Rankings even more than the Classic. Meganinja202 (talk) 23:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- There's no "claim it's a new thing". It'd be ultra-restrictive to effectively say that if something wasn't nominated and successfully posted its very first year of existence that it's henceforth banned from posting. Window closed. The end. Or what if it wasn't hypothetically notable until now? Judge it on today's merits. —Bagumba (talk) 15:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like this has been a thing since 2015, can't claim it's a new thing that just needs to be normalized. Scuba 23:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on notability as well as quality. No evidence this meets WP:ITNSIGNIF. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment With sports events what is not on ITNR I believe we should strongly avoid unless shown otherwise (I don't think it has been here). Though I would like to point out the usage of Chinese Taipei, I am not sure if the term has ever been posted to ITN but such a political term shouldn't go without a qualifier; at a glance it would appear to a reader to do something with the PRC when it pertains to the ROC, as such a parantheses with Taiwan should exist for such cases. Gotitbro (talk) 02:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- It was used only for elections, not for sports as far i remember
- That said i am in favor of the use of the Taiwan term to be used beacuse of common name, i was in doubt if i should use or not since of the highest stantards ITN tends to have, so i went with team name just in case Meganinja202 (talk) 08:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Chinese Taipei" is the typical name for sports per Chinese Taipei, e.g. Chinese Taipei at the 2024 Summer Olympics —Bagumba (talk) 15:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support notability top global competition in a global sport. Just because it hasn't been posted before doesn't mean we can't do so, and basing notability on TV viewing figures is pointless as they are often incorrect, viewership us difficult to measure, and popularity doesn't stem from TV anymore. Abcmaxx (talk) 09:15, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support on notability - genuinely global event, organised by a recognised authority in the sport in question, which is one with a global following even though two countries tend to dominate the headlines. But oppose on quality, as the article lacks sufficient prose narrative, and in places has tense problems implying that the tournament is yet to occur or still going on. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Someone had done edits to the tense since you had posted it, you can check again and see if any more changes are necessary about it? Meganinja202 (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. The top international baseball competition is the World Baseball Classic. The Premier12 does not include MLB players so it really ISN'T a top level competition in the sport, IMO. DarkSide830 (talk) 05:48, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
November 26
edit
November 26, 2024
(Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
|
RD: Shalom Nagar
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Jonathan Deamer (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Known for executing war criminal and Nazi Party official Adolf Eichmann by hanging. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 19:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note this article has been nominated for AFD. Until that is resolved, I don't believe we can post this. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Earl Holliman
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Hollywood Reporter
Credits:
- Nominated by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Article updated and well sourced. Death announced on this date. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 23:56, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support no quality issues. Aydoh8[contribs] 00:43, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. All sourced. Looks good to me. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 13:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support properly cited. no quality issues. Scuba 15:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Well sourced, no tags, ready to post. Jusdafax (talk) 16:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 07:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) Israel-Lebanon Ceasefire
editBlurb: Israel and Lebanon agree to a 60-day ceasefire agreement to halt the war in Lebanon (Post)
Alternative blurb: Israel and Hezbollah agree to a a 60-day ceasefire agreement to halt the the war in Lebanon
News source(s): CBS
Credits:
- Nominated by Knightoftheswords281 (talk · give credit)
- Created by Noble Attempt (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Noble Attempt (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: A ceasefire agreement between the two countries is expected to enter into force tomorrow. Article seems decent. — Knightoftheswords 20:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support A major development. If the ceasefire agreement is actually implemented in the manner claimed by Netanyahu and Biden, it would mean the reclamation of control by the Lebanese army and effectively the end of Hezbollah military dominance in most of southern Lebanon. I am fine to wait until tomorrow if necessary to see if the ceasefire agreement is ultimately accepted by all parties - but assuming it is successfully entered into, then this should be posted. FlipandFlopped ツ 20:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality only. The background has far too much focus on the conflict where this should use summaries more and point to relevant pages via main/seealso templates. There should be more on the past efforts to organize a ceasefire, including nations involved (here, this being US and France). Masem (t) 21:14, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support First ceasefire since the start of the conflict over a year ago, and is a major development of the conflict. TheHiddenCity (talk) 22:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- •Support Regardless if the attempted ceasefire is successful or not. This is a historical development to the conflict. Rager7 (talk) 23:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. This is a major development in the conflict, even if the conflict itself is covered by ongoing. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support - suggest Alt Blurb Shouldn't it technically be a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah (not lebanon) this is how most RS are noting it. Schwinnspeed (talk) 03:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Wait for ceasefire to formally go into effect, thensupport altblurb per Schwinnspeed. The Kip (contribs) 04:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)- It formally went into effect two hours ago. 98.170.164.88 (talk) 04:30, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Alt blurb. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:05, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support original blurb, not alt blurb. CNN reports "Israel and Lebanon have accepted a US-backed proposal"[5]. Lebanon is a party to this agreement (as noted in the article itself), and the Lebanese army taking control south of the Litani is a major part of this agreement. L'Orient Today, a major Lebanese newspaper, also presented the full text of the "cease-fire agreement between Israel and Lebanon"[6], and several points of the agreement relate specifically to the Lebanese government.VR (Please ping on reply) 05:20, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Vice regent:: The vast majority of reliable news sources specify Hezbollah in their headlines, here are just a few: Washington Post, New York Times, BBC, Reuters, [NBC]. It feels like an important distinction for ITN. Schwinnspeed (talk) 05:30, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Firstly, headlines are not reliable. Secondly, plenty of sources characterize this as "Israel and Lebanon" ceasefire: Atlantic Council, UN news, Politico, Axios, LA Times etc. Thirdly, looking deeper into the sources makes it clear that the Israeli government, Lebanese government and Hezbollah leadership are all parties to this agreement. One could argue that "Lebanon" is accurate, since all Hezbollah members are Lebanese citizens. Some potential compromises would be to say "Israel and Lebanon, including Hezbollah, agree to..." or "The Israeli and Lebanese governments, and Hezbollah agree to..." VR (Please ping on reply) 08:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Vice regent:: The vast majority of reliable news sources specify Hezbollah in their headlines, here are just a few: Washington Post, New York Times, BBC, Reuters, [NBC]. It feels like an important distinction for ITN. Schwinnspeed (talk) 05:30, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - if there was an armistice, but given the history of ceasefires in past conflicts, this may not be that significant. Especially with reports that Israel warning Lebanese civilians not to return to the south. In the meantime, this is covered by ongoing. Nfitz (talk) 05:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also, the article to link for the current war in Lebanon should be 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, as per consensus here.VR (Please ping on reply) 05:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support A possible flagpole of the war. ArionStar (talk) 12:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Blurb I: Historic end to Hezbollah's control of the south (for now at least) Prodrummer619 (talk) 13:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support altblurb in principle. Widely reported news which should bring the fighting to at least a temporary halt on one front. The altblurb is more accurate than the original. However I have two concerns with the article: a) The 'background' section has sparse references; because this is a controversial topic that should be improved, especially when discussing motivations. I'm not a fan of mirroring a section from another article, but if that's the approach taken it will require fixing on the mirrored article. b) The lead indicates that this is a permanent ceasefire, but the body (and nominated blurb) both say it's only for 60 days. Those should be made consistent. Modest Genius talk 14:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support alt not seeing any glaring problems with the article. Scuba 15:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Posted, but more concisely, avoiding "agree to an agreement". Sandstein 20:31, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
RD: Jim Abrahams
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Deadline Hollywood
Credits:
- Nominated by Masem (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: part of the Zucker, Abrahams, Zucker trio that produced comedy films like Airplane! Article needs more sources Masem (t) 19:40, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for now as nom said, the article is in need of more sources and is currently orange tagged. If these issues are fixed, please ping me and I will change my vote accordingly. Aydoh8[contribs] 00:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose orange tag, vast swaths of the article are uncited. Scuba 15:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Article is a stub, and we don't post stubs. Schwede66 07:13, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: John Tinniswood
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [[7]], [[8]]
Credits:
- Nominated by Julius Barclay (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: World's oldest man, oldest surviving World War II Veteran, died Monday aged 112. Was oldest man since 29 June 2024. Julius Barclay (talk) 15:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support RIP. No quality issues that I could find. Aydoh8[contribs] 00:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Meets ITN standards. No citation issues or anything like that. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 04:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article looks good. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 06:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Notable, no issues, Article in the news, so postable. ExclusiveEditor Notify Me! 11:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- The one time "old man dies" is actually an argument in favour of posting. 147.161.133.85 (talk) 15:52, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- The "old man dies" argument is usually used by people against posting blurbs, as RD doesn't have the same notability requirements of ITN. Aydoh8[contribs] 03:32, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- The one time "old man dies" is actually an argument in favour of posting. 147.161.133.85 (talk) 15:52, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support no problems Scuba 15:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 07:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
RD: Jan Furtok
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Polish Radio
Credits:
- Nominated by Abcmaxx (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: The article could be easily expanded, doesn't convey nearly enough that he was one of Poland’s best ever players. Abcmaxx (talk) 17:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support no immediate quality issues. Aydoh8[contribs] 00:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Insufficient depth of coverage, needs expansion in prose. SpencerT•C 04:07, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose For someone who played for the national team for nearly ten years, the career section is quite short. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 06:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Soft support sure the article could use some expansion, but the content that is there is of a high enough quality to post. Scuba 15:52, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ohmygoodness Soft support sounds so much better than weak support, it's so 2020s. I'm gonna use that from now on.--Ouro (blah blah) 06:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
November 25
edit
November 25, 2024
(Monday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
Sports
|
(Posted) RD: Mike Hasenfratz
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [9][10]
Credits:
- Nominated by Flibirigit (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Pyropylon98 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Former referee in the National Hockey League Flibirigit (talk) 02:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Short but adequate. No serious issues. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:27, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Working on expansion. Flibirigit (talk) 19:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Significant expansion completed. Flibirigit (talk) 01:47, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Working on expansion. Flibirigit (talk) 19:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks good enough. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 06:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. No problems found. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 13:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support no problems Scuba 15:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 07:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Nikki Kaye
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Former National minister Nikki Kaye dies, aged 44
Credits:
- Nominated by Schwede66 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Former New Zealand MP; died aged 44 from cancer. Date of death is not known yet. Schwede66 01:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Significant amount of CN tags. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 02:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I have added some references to all but one of the CN tags to improve verifiability. Think article is in good enough shape now. Kiwichris (talk) 05:10, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support one outstanding CN tag but I guess we could just remove it if we can't find a source for it. Aydoh8[contribs] 00:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 04:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm not seeing any cn tags, just two whom tags, but considering the length of the article I think that's fine for inclusion in RD. Scuba 15:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Swiftair 737 crashes in Lithuania
editBlurb: A Swiftair Boeing 737 (accident aircraft pictured) crashes near Vilnius Airport, Lithuania, killing one pilot. (Post)
News source(s): BBC FlightGlobal CNN
Credits:
- Nominated by Aydoh8 (talk · give credit)
- Created by RandomInfinity17 (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Very rare to see an airliner crashing in Europe. No immediate quality issues apart from a UGS tag which could easily be fixed. Edit: it appears to have been fixed. Aydoh8[contribs] 00:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'd support this as a testament to the development of airliner crash safety; ten were involved in a crash of a cargo airliner and only one lost their life. Oppose for now because only one person died. Maybe if this becomes a wider incident like the 737 plague it'd be notable but as it is we're to a point where (at least in my opinion) large airplane crashes are not blurb-worthy. Departure– (talk) 01:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose low number of fatalities/injuries as this was a cargo plane and does not seem like a systemic issue that would cause scrutiny of the aircraft line. Natg 19 (talk) 01:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose good faith nom. Only a single fatality and the long term significance of this event is doubtful. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Thankfully a comparatively minor incident with low casualties. The Kip (contribs) 03:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Seems unlikely to be posted but it's in the news and we have a decent article about it. Attracted international coverage. AusLondonder (talk) 12:29, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose good faith nom but only 1 fatality and pretty much everything above The AP (talk) 17:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support it was a cargo plane, the only people on board where the pilots, casualties shouldn't be what keeps this from being posted. Article is of high quality, and this is getting global coverage in the news.
- It's a Boeing 737 crash, that alone should warrant inclusion. Scuba 20:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- No, it doesn't warrant inclusion just because it's a 737, especially if one cannot tell the difference between a 737-400SF of the second generation 737 Classic series and one of the fourth generation 737 MAX series. -- KTC (talk) 21:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - seems relatively minor in the great scheme of things. No prejudice on relisting if it turns out to be a Russian terror attack or something. Nfitz (talk) 05:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. We wouldn't post a road crash that caused one death. I don't see any reason to treat this differently just because it involved an aeroplane. Procedurally, the nominated blurb doesn't even link to the article! Modest Genius talk 14:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Leaning Oppose. (edit conflict) Low amount of casualties but other than that, this was mostly a minor incident and sabotage doesn't seem to be the cause for now. It's a relief that there weren't any ground casualties/injuries. It seems that cargo aircraft accidents are rarely posted if the accident was significant enough. For example, Turkish Airlines Flight 6491 was posted due to the high death toll on the ground. Flight 810's nomination was against posting as no one died. Moreover, no one seem to have nominated the crash of Atlas Air Flight 3591 (3 casualties). 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 14:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) Trump Charges Dismissed
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb:
Alternative blurb: All remaining Federal criminal charges against US president-elect Donald Trump are dismissed without prejudice due to presidential immunity.
News source(s): AP
Credits:
- Nominated by Ad Orientem (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
- I have struck my original blurb in favor of the alt which is much better. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:02, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- two wrongs don't make a right — hako9 (talk) 23:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- True, but this is probably as close as we can get. The indictments should never have been posted and it is my sincere hope that we never do anything like that again. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - consequence of a story we already posted, Trump winning the presidential election. The idea that a truly unprecedented event, a former president being indicted on criminal charges, should not have been posted is both a personal opinion and not relevant to whether or not this story should be posted. nableezy - 23:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- If you are going to post that someone is charged with a crime, and we certainly would have (and in one case correctly did) post any convictions, why would we not post the dismissal of the charges? (Unless the decisions involved were heavily motivated by a strong animus or a desire to right great wrongs.) -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Besides the utter lack of AGF in that parentheses, the reason is that one thing was unprecedented and treated as such across the globe, and the other is a predictable consequence of what we already posted. I wont return the favor of failing to AGF in making unsubstantiated claims about the motives of this nomination. And also, despite the claim that there is a probable final disposition of this story here, the charges were dismissed without prejudice, allowing them to be re-filed when Trumps presidency comes to an end. nableezy - 00:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- So basically we can announce criminal indictments on the main page of one of the most trafficked websites in the world, and quietly ignore it when they go away? The fact that he was an ex-president is neither here nor there. He was entitled to the basic protections of BLP and we set aside our very longstanding practice of only posting convictions. And FTR my opinion of Donald Trump is unprintable. But I do believe in basic fairness, even for people I detest. I'm not going to relitigate what happened beyond that it was an egregious error that should not be compounded. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- It is here and there, that was an unprecedented event in US history. And sources treated it as such. The basic protections of BLP are to not say anything untrue about a public figure, and he was indicted. There was zero BLP issue in saying that. I dgaf what our very longstanding practice is, there is nothing in BLP that says we should not include what is verifiably true. And there is nothing in any guideline that says one of the biggest news stories of the year should not be on our front page section of In the News. BLP does not mean, and has never meant, we cannot include anything negative about a living person, it means we write conservatively and accurately. It was indisputably true that Donald Trump was indicted in several criminal cases and that he was the first former US president in history to have been indicted. There is 0 BLP issue in saying that, not in an article and not on the front page. nableezy - 00:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- So basically we can announce criminal indictments on the main page of one of the most trafficked websites in the world, and quietly ignore it when they go away? The fact that he was an ex-president is neither here nor there. He was entitled to the basic protections of BLP and we set aside our very longstanding practice of only posting convictions. And FTR my opinion of Donald Trump is unprintable. But I do believe in basic fairness, even for people I detest. I'm not going to relitigate what happened beyond that it was an egregious error that should not be compounded. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Besides the utter lack of AGF in that parentheses, the reason is that one thing was unprecedented and treated as such across the globe, and the other is a predictable consequence of what we already posted. I wont return the favor of failing to AGF in making unsubstantiated claims about the motives of this nomination. And also, despite the claim that there is a probable final disposition of this story here, the charges were dismissed without prejudice, allowing them to be re-filed when Trumps presidency comes to an end. nableezy - 00:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- If you are going to post that someone is charged with a crime, and we certainly would have (and in one case correctly did) post any convictions, why would we not post the dismissal of the charges? (Unless the decisions involved were heavily motivated by a strong animus or a desire to right great wrongs.) -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose was foregone conclusion as soon as Trump was named the winner. Also a subtlety is that they are being dropped without prejudice, meaning they could be brought up once he is out of office, so it's not the true end of the story. Masem (t) 00:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- It was a forgone conclusion that Trump was going to face criminal indictments. We posted them anyway. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:27, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- No it wasn't, we had no way to predict how the grand jury, and Smith's subsequent actions, would go, because they didn't discuss them in public until court filings. Trump said numerous times that he would make the cases go away as president, and the DOJ has a standing policy that they cannot go after a sitting president, so that this happened like this was of zero surprise.. Only that Smith volunteered to end it before Trump took office might not have been part of it but the net result was. Masem (t) 00:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- It was a forgone conclusion that Trump was going to face criminal indictments. We posted them anyway. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:27, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose current blurb If Trump's charges were dismissed on the merits or he was explicitly found not guilty, that would be one thing. Here, however, the blurb is actively misleading: the current phrasing, by omission, makes it sound like the case against Trump was dismissed on the merits. In fact, the opposite is true: the government initiated the motion to dismiss on a without prejudice basis while maintaining the strength of its case. The sole and only reason for this is the constitutional prohibition on prosecuting a sitting president. Per the Government's motion to dismiss: the dismissal "does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the government's proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the government stands fully behind". FlipandFlopped ツ 00:40, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Fair point. I tend to try and keep blurbs succinct but have no objections to an alt blurb if you would care to propose one. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- And a fair response, Ad Orientem. I have added an alt blurb.
I soft support alt blurb.On the one hand, I think that this a foregone conclusion: if he won, this was always going to happen. On the other hand, I am generally an inclusionist when it comes to things making global headlines going on ITN. Given that we posted the indictment, I am inclined to support for reasons of balance. FlipandFlopped ツ 00:51, 26 November 2024 (UTC)- Upon further review of the target article, I oppose on quality grounds per Andrew Davidson. The target article doesn't contain sufficient explanation & updated information corresponding to the info communicated in the blurb. FlipandFlopped ツ 15:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- And a fair response, Ad Orientem. I have added an alt blurb.
- Oppose for now per all above. Maybe I'd support if he actually went to prison in this time. Departure– (talk) 01:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per MASEM. The process leading to the dismissal of charges was perhaps unexpected, but the fact of the matter is, the ultimate result of these cases with Trump as the sitting president likely wouldn't have had much actual impact, and I'd say the lack of a verdict is of even less impact in the end. DarkSide830 (talk) 01:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per all above. The Kip (contribs) 06:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for the same reasons the 1 July 2024 SCOTUS decision on presidential immunity. Trump winning the presidential election is noteworthy, while this doesn't have the notability for ITN. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 15:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Procedurally, there's zero mention of this blurb at the bolded target.—Bagumba (talk) 07:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The nominated article has not been updated. And that article covers multiple proceedings and some are still open or are now proceeding to sentencing. We shouldn't run a headline saying that all charges have been dismissed when it's more complex than that. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per all above - wasn't this closed ? The AP (talk) 17:28, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose why is this still open? Scuba 20:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) 2024 Sambhal Violence, Uttar Pradesh, India
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: At least 4 people died and 30 injuries(20 police), Violent clashes in Uttar Pradesh, India (Post)
News source(s): BBC Indiatoday Timesofindia Economic Times
Credits:
- Nominated by Spworld2 (talk · give credit)
changed RD box to normal ITN box --2600:1700:4579:B80:9D1C:5ECE:9EEB:47FD (talk) 10:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Without expansion, this seems like a small flare up in a country where such protests and conflicts are commonplace. --Masem (t) 13:25, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sad to say but such violence and riots are common in India; additionally, it is a small flare-up with only 4 deaths, thus not not worthy of ITN The AP (talk) 13:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per all above. Tragic, but commonplace in a country like India. _-_Alsor (talk) 14:30, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Undecided on the nom but do we really need three comments belittling the world's largest democracy and trivialising the deaths as "only 4" in a "country like India"? AusLondonder (talk) 14:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- we are stating facts and not because it is “the world's largest democracy” we are not going to give it a special notoriety if they are recurrent events in that country. It is the same parameter we use to judge shootings in the United States or earthquakes in the Philippines. Since this is not a news-ticket portal, we should value it more for notoriety than for newsworthiness. _-_Alsor (talk) 14:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- WP is not a newspaper and not every event, even those involving deaths, necessary need coverage, much less inclusion on the main page. How likely is this going to have enduring coverage and not just a burst of news? — Masem (t) 15:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- I am an Indian myself, and I don't find any interpretation of any comment that is "belittling" the "world's largest democracy." Even though the incident is tragic, it has a low number of fatalities; as such, I didn't find it worthy for ITN. Also to note - such incidents are common and recurring in India sadly so we can't possibly include each of them to ITN The AP (talk) 15:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Soft oppose I'm not seeing this being reported outside of Indian news sources. It's terrible that people have died, but I just don't think this is a major enough event to warrant ITN posting. Scuba 16:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
2024 Uruguayan general election
editBlurb: Yamandú Orsi and the Broad Front wins the runoff to the 2024 Uruguayan general election against Álvaro Delgado and the Republican Coalition. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Yamandú Orsi (pictured) is elected president of Uruguay
News source(s): Al Jazeera AP News
Credits:
- Nominated by Staraction (talk · give credit)
- Created by Fadesga (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Gbuvn (talk · give credit), Fadesga (talk · give credit), Loveisamoracle (talk · give credit), Segagustin (talk · give credit) and Spaastm (talk · give credit)
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: I believe this is ITN/R as both a change in the president (according to AP News) and as the results of a general election. Please let me know if I'm missing something; thanks! Staraction (talk | contribs) 03:30, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Álvaro Delgado is a disambiguation link. I think you mean Álvaro Delgado (politician). 64.114 etc 04:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed - thanks. Staraction (talk | contribs) 07:12, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose very little prose on campaign and aftermath. The Kip (contribs) 06:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality Second half of the article is almost entirely tables. Needs more prose to be suitable for ITN. FlipandFlopped ツ 07:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Soft oppose the article only has a one sentence aftermath section and is mostly tables. It is ITN/R, so once that is cleaned up I'll change my vote. Scuba 16:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Breyten Breytenbach
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [11]
Credits:
- Nominated by Plifal (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Laterthanyouthink (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Nominator's comments: Important anti-apartheid activist and poet laureate. – Plifal (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Not Ready. Citation needed tags are in place. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 06:16, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Soft support I only see one CN tag. Scuba 16:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Properly cited. His works are their own citations. Bremps... 20:12, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I have added significantly to this article since yesterday, and although there is no doubt more that could be added, I think it's ready to go. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The article is ready for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 03:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. No citation needed tags when I looked just a few minutes ago. Putting this onto the main page might lead to some much-needed improvement... -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 21:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: I've cleaned up the major mess I made, leaving the secondary sources I'd added before suddenly getting terribly confused while reading about translingualism and abandoning a language to write in another... -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 00:22, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Seems adequate to me, no CN Tags. FlipandFlopped ツ 22:56, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 04:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
November 24
edit
November 24, 2024
(Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Sports
|
RD: Colin Renfrew
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Telegraph
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:98F0:B089:1413:EFBE (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: British archaeologist. 240F:7A:6253:1:98F0:B089:1413:EFBE (talk) 06:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Article needs major ref work. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 06:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
RD: Bruce Thompson (Georgia politician)
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [12]
Credits:
- Nominated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
– Muboshgu (talk) 17:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Pretty close, however only has 1 sentence about what he accomplished in each of his political roles ("Thompson became the chair of the economic development and tourism committee" and "Thompson's office reported finding $105 million of unremitted state money which should have been turned over to the state treasury in August 2023".) Not sure if there's anything that can be added for additional depth? SpencerT•C 03:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Barbara Taylor Bradford
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Times of India
Credits:
- Nominated by Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Lajmmoore (talk · give credit) and Innisfree987 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: British-American novelist Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Soft support: Adaptations uncited, two cn tags, and a bit of a prose problem, but otherwise the article looks fine. Scuba 16:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No need to be so soft with it. Two CN tags, and a completely unsourced Selected works section mean that this article needs work before it can be posted. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 19:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- support I've fixed the cn tags and have added references to all the selected works listed Lajmmoore (talk) 23:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per article quality. SerialNumber54129 23:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- comment I left a note about this nomination at Wikiproject Women in Red Lajmmoore (talk) 11:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- May I ask what the quality concern is @Serial Number 54129? Maybe I can help. Innisfree987 (talk) 20:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. I’ve done some work on the lead and can’t see where else this falls short of our usual standards so I think it’s ready. Innisfree987 (talk) 23:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 06:04, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Rico Carty
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [13]
Credits:
- Nominated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
– Muboshgu (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Not Ready. Several sentences still require the usual.Post-Posting Support, Resolved. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 06:17, 25 November 2024 (UTC)- @Midori No Sora; should be solved :). Kline • talk • contribs 14:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support - looks good now! ✈ mike_gigs talkcontribs 15:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support article looks fine. Scuba 16:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 17:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
COP29
editBlurb: COP29 concludes with an agreement on finance for developing nations to help them address and mitigate climate change. (Post)
News source(s): NYT, Reuters, BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk · give credit)
- Created by Arcahaeoindris (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Kirkylad (talk · give credit) and Toghrul R (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Nominator's comments: Neither the conference nor our article seem impressive but we should consider the topic while we are planning to promote multiple motor racing events (1, 2, 3). It's certainly in the news and significant. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:24, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- What relevance do the Motorsports items have to this, beyond ye olde “sports r dumb” comment? The Kip (contribs) 09:43, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- They all use fossil fuels. The conference agreed a statement about transitioning away from fossil fuels despite opposition from countries like Saudi Arabia. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ugh, this is irrelevant to whether this conference should get posted or not. We should be considering each event individually on their own merits. I am personally neutral on this nomination, as I do not know much about COP. Natg 19 (talk) 10:09, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- FYI, the similar COP28 conference was posted last year. See nomination. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Which at least was a commitment to direct action to reduce factors impacting climate change. Funding aspects like this year's is not a direct action. Masem (t) 16:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- FYI, the similar COP28 conference was posted last year. See nomination. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- So true dude... we should outlaw all motorsports because Palau said so or something idk. Scuba 18:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ugh, this is irrelevant to whether this conference should get posted or not. We should be considering each event individually on their own merits. I am personally neutral on this nomination, as I do not know much about COP. Natg 19 (talk) 10:09, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- They all use fossil fuels. The conference agreed a statement about transitioning away from fossil fuels despite opposition from countries like Saudi Arabia. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Article looks good and well cited. Moraljaya67 (talk)
- Oppose on quality, at least. Article may be well sourced but is a mess in terms of tenses (a lot of future tense). In terms of significance, I'm not sure if this result is really as impactful as something like the Paris agreement to merit posting. --Masem (t) 13:30, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality per above. I'm neutral, leaning support on notability. The title really should be COP29 though, Climate Change has always and will always be brought here only to not be posted. Departure– (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed the headline. Brandmeistertalk 14:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Have we posted COP before? Scuba 15:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Scu ba Yes, indeed we have done it in several occasions, including last year, in 2021 and in 2015. Oltrepier (talk) 15:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, then I'll vote Support, article is of high enough quality, and there is precedent. Scuba 15:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Scu ba Yes, indeed we have done it in several occasions, including last year, in 2021 and in 2015. Oltrepier (talk) 15:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support: as much as the final result of this conference feels extremely disappointing, the COPs are still one of the most important tools national delegations and associations have to negotiate on plans aimed to help our planet and its ecosystems survive. So, yeah, I think they should be addressed even when progress is not so significant. By the way, I'll try to go through the article myself to correct the grammar, as suggested by Masem. Oltrepier (talk) 15:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Right, I've tried to get the article in better shape, and I think I should have solved all of the most glaring issues with tenses and grammar, although I must confess there are a lot of useful bits of information that are still missing from the page... Oltrepier (talk) 21:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Oltrepier. FlipandFlopped ツ 16:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on notability these summits happen regularly and there's always lots of talk but nothing of note ever happens other than vague meaningless declarations as a result, leaving everyone, particularly those still believing something might change, predictably dissapointed. Having a handful of people fly in on private planes from around the world to an oil-rich dictatorship to pretend to do something about climate change is textbook greenwashing. Abcmaxx (talk) 21:33, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: For the reasons @Abcmaxx succinctly outlines. Also, because we have posted something in the past doesn't mean we should now. Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 22:03, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support These conferences happen annually, but they are the largest regular international conferences on Climate Change. This year's summit notably saw an agreement on a specific numerical goal for climate finance. Jackattack1597 (talk) 04:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- But none of these outcomes are tangible results of any consequence; the frequency of these conferences makes it all more apparent Abcmaxx (talk) 11:07, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- When we have posted the COP conclusion before at ITN, it is usually tied to a commitment to do some actual actions to reduce climate change (even if they can't be held accountable, etc.) Simply saying they will plan to help poorer countries with financing towards climate change is sorta a nothing-burger in the larger picture regarding CC, given that those pooer countries are typically the least likely contributors towards it. — Masem (t) 13:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Some may call it an idle man's show and I personally don't see any notable step they took, but the event might still notable enough. Wikipedia has a good article on it, and it is on the news, to present it is what ITN does. ExclusiveEditor Notify Me! 14:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- I guess 300 BILLION dollars annually for loans and grants to tiny countries isn't a notable step. Scuba 18:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Given that nations that set to receive that money say that's not nearly enough, yes [14] — Masem (t) 20:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Of the proposed $1.3 trillion from this year onwards, 300 billion does fall short. ExclusiveEditor Notify Me! 06:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- I guess 300 BILLION dollars annually for loans and grants to tiny countries isn't a notable step. Scuba 18:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on significance. This year's summit doesn't seem to have as large of an effect as others and the extent of it being in the news seems to be "it happened" ✈ mike_gigs talkcontribs 16:27, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Abcmaxx. The Kip (contribs) 06:10, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Chia-ying Yeh
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): China Daily
Credits:
- Nominated by Greencarp (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Zanhe (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Death confirmed today. Chinese-born Canadian poet and sinologist Greencarp (talk) 13:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support article properly cited. Scuba 15:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support - looks good enough ✈ mike_gigs talkcontribs 15:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support and marking ready. FlipandFlopped ツ 16:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 17:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
RD: Zvi Kogan
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Washington Post
Credits:
- Nominated by Thriley (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Death confirmed today. Article was just created. Needs expansion. Thriley (talk) 07:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support article looks good. Scuba 15:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article is in good shape with lots of sources. Z'L Pyramids09 (talk) 10:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support - looks ready for posting ✈ mike_gigs talkcontribs 15:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support and marking ready. FlipandFlopped ツ 16:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Not sure if this is technically eligible for RD if the article is about his death? Not sure how this has been handled in the past. WP:ITNRDBLURB suggests that something like this should be blurbed when the death is the main topic. SpencerT•C 17:16, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- There was Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/June 2020 § (Closed) RD: David McAtee, which said the page needed to be a biography. —Bagumba (talk) 10:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support it would be a gimme if the title were "assassination of," as it should be. Scharb (talk) 17:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose WP:ITNRD requires that the subject
has a biographical Wikipedia article
. But this is more narrowly a death page, whose title is being further proposed to be specifically a muder page. It can alternatively be proposed as a blurb for the murder, if notable, but that has a higher significance bar than a basic RD.—Bagumba (talk) 10:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Fred R. Harris
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:
- Nominated by Staraction (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Sunshineisles2 (talk · give credit), MallonAllah12 (talk · give credit) and Flipandflopped (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American politican from Oklahoma. Staraction (talk | contribs) 04:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support no problems with the article. Scuba 15:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support addressed a couple CN tags and reviewed the article; looks good. Tagging ready now. FlipandFlopped ツ 16:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 17:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) 2024 World Rally Championship
editBlurb: In motorsport, Thierry Neuville (pictured) and Martijn Wydaeghe win the World Rally Championship. (Post)
Alternative blurb: In motorsport, Thierry Neuville (pictured) and Martijn Wydaeghe win the World Rally Championship, while Toyota win the manufacturer's title.
News source(s): France 24
Credits:
- Nominated by Moraljaya67 (talk · give credit)
- Created by Unnamelessness (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Unnamelessness (talk · give credit)
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: Looks like the article is good for posting. Moraljaya67 (talk) 04:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment tweaked the blurb Added ALT blurb. Unnamelessness (talk) 07:30, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The article is good to go. Probrably could issue a blurb together with the F1, something like: In motorsport, Max Verstappen and the crew of Thierry Neuville and Martijn Wydaeghe respectively win the the Formula One World Championship and the World Rally Championship. Unnamelessness (talk) 07:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- These are completely unrelated sports, so shouldn't be combined. Yes they both use cars, but we wouldn't combine rugby with football just because they both use balls, or tennis with squash because they both use racquets. Modest Genius talk 15:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- The difference is that both championships are organized by the same organization (Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile), and both championships are listed under the same ITNR category (Motorsport). Unnamelessness (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- These are completely unrelated sports, so shouldn't be combined. Yes they both use cars, but we wouldn't combine rugby with football just because they both use balls, or tennis with squash because they both use racquets. Modest Genius talk 15:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support article looks good. Scuba 15:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment many parts of the text are ungrammatical and unidiomatic, as if they've been through automated translation. I've tried to tidy up the season summary, but parts are still contradictory or difficult to follow. This could do with some attention by someone who followed the season - I don't have time to dig into all the references. Modest Genius talk 15:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Also Support unnamelessness’ suggestion 27.96.223.193 (talk) 04:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose an independent blurb, as I am in favour of a conjoined blurb with the F1 ITNR blurb. Two motorsport blurbs clogs up the main page, and they can logically be grouped together. FlipandFlopped ツ 07:06, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- They are 2 completely different events and so should not be merged into one blurb. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- they’re both motorsport. 27.96.223.193 (talk) 23:14, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- They are 2 completely different events and so should not be merged into one blurb. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support only as a separate blurb. This is WP:ITNR and meets article quality standards and so should be posted as a separate blurb- this is no different to having multiple election articles listed at the same time on ITN. This discussion isn't an appropriate place to try and re-write how ITN and ITNR nominations work, these 2 events are not related just because they both use cars. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Voicing quality concerns about how to better optimize the phrasing of blurb(s) is inappropriate to bring up in the discussion and voting section of those very same blurbs? ITNR means the event itself is notable enough to make it on the main page. How the article is blurbed and presented remains subject to community consensus, which entails room for disagreement without accusations of inappropriate behaviour. FlipandFlopped ツ 16:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- A combined mix of 2 not the same events is not the same as posting them separately which is what the ITNR nomination is for. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I will respectfully agree to disagree. FlipandFlopped ツ 00:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- A combined mix of 2 not the same events is not the same as posting them separately which is what the ITNR nomination is for. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Voicing quality concerns about how to better optimize the phrasing of blurb(s) is inappropriate to bring up in the discussion and voting section of those very same blurbs? ITNR means the event itself is notable enough to make it on the main page. How the article is blurbed and presented remains subject to community consensus, which entails room for disagreement without accusations of inappropriate behaviour. FlipandFlopped ツ 16:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support nomination but strong oppose combined blurb we would not combine futsal with association football even though both are similar and organised by the same governing body; that would be the sporting equivalent of combining Uruguayan and Somaliland election blurbs because they are both elections. WRC and F1 are completely different sports, we wouldn't combine Moto GP with F1, this is a much bigger distinction; bigger than you would have between F1 and Formula-E for example, despite those two also being very different cars (would not support combining them either). Abcmaxx (talk) 07:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. The F1 blurb has long been posted while this one lingers because some editors want a combined blurb. That seems rather unfair... Fram (talk) 09:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, if we are not combining the blurbs, then I am not opposed to posting the article. Its quality is more than sufficient to meet ITNCrit. FlipandFlopped ツ 16:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Admins willing to post ITN: ready to go? The only hangup was whether or not to post a combined blurb. Natg 19 (talk) 17:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) Sara Duterte
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: The Vice President of the Philippines Sara Duterte (pictured) causes outrage after claiming in a briefing that she had spoken to kill President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First lady Liza Araneta Marcos and House Speaker Martin Romualdez if she were to killed. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Vice President of the Philippines Sara Duterte (pictured) under fire after allegedly revealing in a briefing if she had arranged and assassination of President of the Philippines Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First lady Liza Araneta Marcos and House Speaker of the Philippines Martin Romualdez if she were to die.
Alternative blurb II: The Vice President of the Philippines Sara Duterte (pictured) faces criticism after reportedly admitting in a briefing that she ordered the assassination of President of the Philippines Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First lady Liza Araneta Marcos and House Speaker of the Philippines Martin Romualdez if she were killed.
News source(s): NBC, CNN and Reuters
Credits:
- Nominated by Royiswariii (talk · give credit)
- Strong oppose until this evolves into widespread protests, or a political crisis, or something beyond non-specific claims of "outrage". At least something with article to point towards, feigning the possibility of Duterte's death following these comments. Departure– (talk) 05:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Added bold formatting to bring all blurbs to ITN style. Departure– (talk) 05:05, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- check the alt blurb Royiswariii Talk! 05:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Please note that it started on conflict of Marcos-Duterte on Investigation of War on Drugs in the Philippines of Former President Rodrigo Duterte. And in Mary Grace Piattos issue that possibly go on impeachment too (While I'm replying this, it's in the investigation of Quad committee of the Philippines). I can't remember other issues of Duterte-Marcos it's so many issues lol. Royiswariii Talk! 05:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose "Politician criticized for incendiary comments about hypothetical situation" is not ITN material. The Kip (contribs) 06:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: This is WP:NOTNEWS and also, I think, that every criticisms/controversies of a certain politician is habitual news.Moraljaya67 (talk)
November 23
edit
November 23, 2024
(Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Politics and elections
Sports
|
(Posted) 2024 Formula One World Championship
editBlurb: In motorsport, Max Verstappen (pictured) wins the Formula One World Championship. (Post)
Alternative blurb: In motorsport, Max Verstappen (pictured) wins the Formula One World Championship, while Thierry Neuville and Martijn Wydaeghe win the World Rally Championship.
News source(s): ESPN
Credits:
- Nominated by Unnamelessness (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: May produce a combination blurb with the WRC. Unnamelessness (talk) 07:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support with conjoined F1-WRC blurb. Article should be OK too even without the prose on the latest race. Angusgtw (talk) 08:26, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Queston What's a WRC? HiLo48 (talk) 08:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- @HiLo48: World Rally Championship. Personally I would not be in favour of a merge because they're 2 different types of motor racing. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 09:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- I fully agree. HiLo48 (talk) 09:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- @HiLo48: World Rally Championship. Personally I would not be in favour of a merge because they're 2 different types of motor racing. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 09:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support article looks good. Scuba 15:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support combined blurb per Angusgtw. We should combine the entries for the F1 and world rally championship. FlipandFlopped ツ 07:12, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support - article looks ready ✈ mike_gigs talkcontribs 15:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose combined blurb That would be like combining the Super Bowl and Rugby World Cup finals because they both use an oval ball. Abcmaxx (talk) 16:05, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Must we run a photo of a Dutch and Belgian athlete in front of the British flag? How about we use something like instead? Bremps... 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 01:24, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom IDB.S (talk) 04:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support on quality, weak oppose combined blurb. The Kip (contribs) 06:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Formula One. Does not appear to be consensus to post a combined blurb. SpencerT•C 03:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
RD: Chuck Woolery
editRecent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/chuck-woolery-dead-wheel-fortune-love-connection-1236070165/
Credits:
- Nominated by RachelTensions (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Filmography needs sourcing. RachelTensions (talk) 06:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Soft support filmography needs sourcing, but other than that it only has two cn tags. Scuba 15:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
References
editNominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com]
rather than using <ref></ref>
tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.
For the times when <ref></ref>
tags are being used, here are their contents: