Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/October 2021

This page is an archive and its contents should be preserved in their current form;
any comments regarding this page should be directed to Wikipedia talk:In the news. Thanks.

October 31

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Pamela McCorduck

edit
Article: Pamela McCorduck (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYTimes SFChronicle
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American author on Artificial Intelligence. Death announced in WP:RS on this date. Article has shaped into a decent C-class biography and meets homepage / RD hygiene expectations. Ktin (talk) 02:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Doğan Akhanlı

edit
Article: Doğan Akhanlı (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Der Tagesspiegel and many others
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Turkish writer who wrote mostly in Turkish in exile in Germany, fighter against genocides (Jews, Armenians), writing novels and plays as his weapon. High Awards. - Sorry to be late, there was Nelson Freire, and real life. The article has more about him in prison than free, - there should be more about his literature! I need a break for now. Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yes, done - it's sort of the headline though. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RD: James Jemut Masing

edit
Article: James Jemut Masing (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Borneo Post, Free Malaysia Today, The Star
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Malaysian politician. - Indefensible (talk) 00:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Political career section needs expansion; lede has information not included in the body. SpencerT•C 00:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The wikibio is oddly structured. The longest paragraph is about the subject's death, followed by the intro. The shortest paragraph is about his career in politics and is tagged for {expansion} with a request for info on what "he has done in his 8 terms as MLA and in his various ministerial posts." Too many things mentioned in the intro are not found, let alone elaborated, in the subsequent prose. Coverage of the subject's life is clearly incomplete. Time is running out for this RD nom.... --PFHLai (talk) 20:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Frank Farrar

edit
Article: Frank Farrar (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Houston Chronicle, MSN
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American politician. - Indefensible (talk) 00:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2021 Salisbury rail crash

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2021 Salisbury rail crash (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Twelve people are injured when two trains crash at Salisbury, United Kingdom. (Post)
News source(s): (BBC)
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Lack of deaths ≠ lack of notability. Circumstances here unusual (not yet in article as not fully reported by RSs) in that a train derailed and another collided with it following signal failures. Mjroots (talk) 23:05, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Catherine Tizard

edit
Article: Catherine Tizard (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300442525/dame-catherine-tizard-dies-aged-90-after-long-illness
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Fully sourced article. Updated with details of death. MurielMary (talk) 10:25, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 30

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Health and environment

International relations


(Posted) RD: Jerry Remy

edit
Article: Jerry Remy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Boston Globe; WCVB-TV (ABC); WBZ-TV (CBS)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 15:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Pauline Bart

edit
Article: Pauline Bart (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYTimes
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American sociologist. Death announced in WP:RS on this date. Ktin (talk) 03:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Bert Newton

edit
Article: Bert Newton (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10-30/bert-newton-dead-logie-winner-patti-channel-nine/100128054
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Gold Logie winning Australian entertainer since 1952. HiLo48 (talk) 21:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) COP 26

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: COP 26 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: No blurb specified (Post)
News source(s): NYT,
Credits:

Article updated
 --Frifaire (talk) 18:14, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Bernardo Tengarrinha

edit
Article: Bernardo Tengarrinha (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Record (in Portuguese)
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Portuguese footballer on hiatus through leukaemia. Source confirms date as "este sábado" (this Saturday, today) 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:8925:AF57:26B0:613E (talk) 12:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Alan Davidson

edit
Article: Alan Davidson (cricketer, born 1929) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10-30/australian-cricket-great-alan-davidson-dies/100582940
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Australian Test cricketer HiLo48 (talk) 06:14, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 29

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology


(Posted) RD: José Antonio González Casanova

edit
Article: José Antonio González Casanova (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): El Periódico
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Spanish jurist and one of the drafters of the 1978 Spanish Constitution. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 18:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Ashley Mallett

edit
Article: Ashley Mallett (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/ashley-mallett-one-of-australia-s-great-spinners-dies-aged-76-1285896
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Australian Test cricketer HiLo48 (talk) 06:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Tonga's first positive COVID-19 case detected

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: COVID-19 pandemic in Tonga (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Tonga's first positive COVID-19 case detected (Post)
News source(s): Matangi Tonga
Credits:

Article updated
 Count Iblis (talk) 15:24, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Puneeth Rajkumar

edit
Article: Puneeth Rajkumar (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NDTV
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Reinaldo Pared Pérez

edit
Article: Reinaldo Pared Pérez (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.dw.com/es/fallece-el-expresidente-del-senado-dominicano-reinaldo-pared-p%C3%A9rez/a-59660151
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 190.166.7.70 (talk) 10:33, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 28

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Sports


California condors reproduce asexually, a first

edit
Article: California condor (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: California condors (example pictured) are found to be able to reproduce by parthenogenesis. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ This first California condors to have been reproduced by parthenogenesis are identified.
News source(s): NatGeo, CNN, Journal of Heredity
Credits:
Article updated

Nominator's comments: A first for the species — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:248:681:25a0::6f29 (talkcontribs) 18:33, 2021 October 30 (UTC)

October 27

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Bob Ferry

edit
Article: Bob Ferry (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Washington Post; Associated Press; The Baltimore Sun
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 04:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2021 National Rifle Association ransomware attack

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2021 National Rifle Association ransomware attack (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A ransomware attack targets the National Rifle Association (Post)
Alternative blurb: A ransomware attack by a Russian group targets the American National Rifle Association
News source(s): NBC, AP, The Hill, etc
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Developing story, broke today, widely reported on in US national news. This is my first time at ITN so feedback and help will be appreciated. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 01:17, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Mort Sahl

edit
Article: Mort Sahl (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Legendary comedian and political satirist. Some sections need sourcing. Scaramouche33 (talk) 08:04, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 26

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

  • A cyberattack affects gas stations across Iran, rendering government-issued electronic cards used to buy subsidized fuel unuseable and leaving motorists stranded in long queues. No group immediately claims responsibility for the attack. Iran blames an "unidentified foreign power" as being behind the attack. (ABC News)

Disasters and accidents

  • Two people are killed and another is missing as floods triggered by a powerful storm is affecting Catania, Sicily, Italy. Roads have been completely submerged in parts of the region. (BBC News)

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime


(Closed) Princess Mako marries

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



Article: Mako Komuro (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Mako Komuro of Japan marries commoner Kei Komuro, giving up her royal status (Post)
News source(s): [3] [4]
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Headline news in Japan. We posted the British royal wedding in 2011. Banedon (talk) 15:25, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. She was not in line for the throne, whereas William is. This is normal for women in the Japanese Royal Family (a much smaller group than the British Royal Family). 331dot (talk) 15:35, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose she seems to be down 5 generations from being leader. We didn't post Beatrice or Eugenie from the UK, both of whom were similarly unlikely to be rulers. And those weddings had a dedicated article about the wedding, whereas this is a few paragraphs in her biography. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think women can get the Japanese throne at all, unless the law is changed. 331dot (talk) 15:41, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, definitely oppose. Someone who wasn't ever going to get power giving up the non-power is not ITN-worthy. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:44, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I'd consider if she was in the direct line of succession, but no. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 15:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I question whether we should have posted William, but he at least is going to be king. Mako is the Emperor's niece, in a country which excludes all women (and female line men) from the succession. We probably shouldn't post royal marriages at all, but certainly not minor royals who cannot legally inherit the throne. Modest Genius talk 15:55, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Per all previous op's. Subject isn't a significant or widely known person outside Japan. (Please don't read me the rule book on this one. It's just common sense.) Suggest close.Sca (talk) 18:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Walter Smith

edit
Article: Walter Smith (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former Rangers, Everton and Scotland football manager. Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:22, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Roh Tae-woo

edit
Article: Roh Tae-woo (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former president of South Korea. Article is virtually unreferenced and will need some improvement though. - Indefensible (talk) 05:54, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These aren't just the normal sourcing problems, "virtually unreferenced" is if anything an understatement. Apart from today's obituaries, there aren't even citations for detailed English coverage. I don't read Korean, and the Korean article has its own problems (NPOV tagged, lots of unreferenced content, and at least one reference is to "Wikipedia article from 2007"). User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 18:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the subject definitely qualifies on notability but article is probably not doable in time for lack of sources. The Korean article similarly lacking refs to borrow from makes it even harder. - Indefensible (talk) 03:26, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Joe Lee Dunn

edit
Article: Joe Lee Dunn (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): US Day News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Legendary defensive coordinator at Mississippi State and interim head coach at Ole Miss. KingOfAllThings (thou shalt chatter!) 02:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 25

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports


(Posted) RD: Walter Herbert (manager)

edit
Article: Walter Herbert (manager) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): San Francisco Chronicle; Variety; Billboard
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 09:07, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Patrick Reyntiens

edit
Article: Patrick Reyntiens (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.telegraph.co.uk/obituaries/2021/10/28/patrick-reyntiens-genius-20th-century-stained-glass-john-piper/
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: "The leading practitioner of stained glass in" the UK. --PFHLai (talk) 02:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Anthony Downs

edit
Article: Anthony Downs (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Cato Institute WSJ
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American economist; Died October 2nd. Death announced in WP:RS on this day and on 10/27. Article requires some work. I will get to it shortly. If someone wants to get to it before me, please join-in. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 22:22, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Alfredo Diez Nieto

edit
Article: Alfredo Diez Nieto (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): today.in-24 and several in Spanish
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Influential composer, conductor and professor in Cuba who died on his 103rd birthday. Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Fofi Gennimata

edit
Article: Fofi Gennimata (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Greek politician. - Indefensible (talk) 17:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) October 2021 Sudanese coup d'état

edit
Article: October 2021 Sudanese coup d'état (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In Sudan, a military coup deposes the government under Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Sudanese Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok (pictured) and five other senior officials are detained after the interim government is deposed in a military coup.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Sudanese Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok (pictured) is detained after the interim government is deposed in a military coup.
News source(s): Bloomberg, BBC, ABC, AP, Guardian, Al Jazeera
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Developing event that has changed the political situation in Sudan. Article is in decent shape and well supported based on current information. - Indefensible (talk) 03:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wait We need an article first. So far we know that several civilian leaders were arrested, the internet is down and people are protesting. There goes any hopes for democracy in North Africa Scaramouche33 (talk) 05:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    update Now we have an article, but it needs a lot of work before it's ready for the main page Scaramouche33 (talk) 06:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - As previously said, we need an article to assess. Perhaps this nom. should be closed and re-opened when and if we have an article.--Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 05:54, 25 October 2021 (UTC) My bad. It seems that we have a stub article.--Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 05:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - An article was created few minutes ago. Therefore, I updated the nomination and the blurb.--Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 05:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as article creator - The article's still a stub but should be fleshed out enough within a few hours, and the event itself is a perfect fit for the front page news section. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 06:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Eh, it's my first attempt at contributing to an ITN. It's not ready yet, but it's 3:20 AM my time. Hopefully Scaramouche33 and Pikamander2 can continue the work there. –MJLTalk 07:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support The article is basic but fully referenced and good enough to post. Reporting on this part of the world is difficult as it's been shown every time the Mali coups were nominated for example; we may never get the full story or indeed any clear aftermath. Sudanese politics is a very volatile and messy affair and therefore its a challenge to have any sort of clarity on what is happening. Furthermore I'm not sure if we have any Arabic speakers involved but certainly not being one makes it even more difficult. I've added the Guardian article to the references as well by the way. Abcmaxx (talk) 08:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait Is this coup being undertaken by Burhan, or by some other factions in the Armed Forces? Different setnences in the article seem to suggest the possiblity of both outcomes, which are two very different stories, I'm not saying we need the whole story, but I think we need to at least wait until we know who's in charge. Wizardoftheyear (talk) 09:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait as far as I can see, nowhere in the article does it explicitly say it's a successful coup, so we shouldn't be posting a blurb saying that. It looks like it's all up in the air at the moment, so wait until it's properly confirmed what the situation is e.g. who is now de facto in charge. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The blurb suggests it's been a successful coup, whereas I don't see evidence that is the case. The PM and some others have been captured/arrested, but I don't see evidence that the coup is successful i.e. the people partaking in the coup actually have power. I don't see any sources that say the government has been deposed, only that members of that government have been taken. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrew Davidson: please elaborate on your statement "The sources are not reliable"; Bloomberg, BBC, ABC, AP, Guardian, Al Jazeera are the sources? Abcmaxx (talk) 14:27, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If the coup succeeded, is it not ITNR? 331dot (talk) 18:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You know what? Yes, if the coup has succeeded then it would be ITN/R. --LaserLegs (talk) 18:27, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 24

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Politics and elections


(READY) RD: Sunao Tsuboi

edit
Article: Sunao Tsuboi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, AP
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Pikadon Sensei, Japanese anti-nuclear, anti-war activist, and teacher, a survivor of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. --PFHLai (talk) 03:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Erna de Vries

edit
Article: Erna de Vries (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Osradio 104.8; Norddeutscher Rundfunk
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Holocaust survivor and lecturer, well-documented and well-sourced Jmanlucas (talk) 23:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(READY) RD: Fredrik Andersson Hed

edit
Article: Fredrik Andersson Hed (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): PGA European Tour; The Guardian (PA Media)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 11:52, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Arnold Hano

edit
Article: Arnold Hano (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times; Laguna Beach Independent
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 00:38, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Gene Freidman

edit
Article: Gene Freidman (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Some possible POV issues but it's pretty well sourced. Note the surname is "Freidman", not the more common "Friedman". AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 21:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2021 Uzbek presidential election

edit
Article: 2021 Uzbek presidential election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In Uzbekistan, Shavkat Mirziyoyev (pictured) is re-elected President of Uzbekistan. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Shavkat Mirziyoyev (pictured) remains the president of Uzbekistan after a presidential election is held.
News source(s): Euronews, Reuters
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: This seems to be a "show election", but it's still an election. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 06:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

changed the wording from "becomes" to "remains" Abcmaxx (talk) 21:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You mean the table? Probably yes, the table seems to be the main problem and is not vital for the article anyway. --Tone 07:30, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tone Done. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 22:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: James Michael Tyler

edit
Article: James Michael Tyler (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, NBC News, BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: The article needs a lot of sourcing and will require some work to make the MP. --Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 23:58, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 23

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Science and technology


RD: Grant Woods

edit
Article: Grant Woods (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Former Arizona Attorney General Grant Woods dies at 67
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: I've referenced all of the article's prose, except the lead per WP:LEADCITEElli (talk | contribs) 01:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Osman Kavala case

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Osman Kavala (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan announced that ambassadors of United States, Germany, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, and Sweden will be declared "persona non grata" after the demand for the release of civil society activist Osman Kavala (Post)
News source(s): FT, CNBC
Credits:

Article updated
PS: Nominating IP address listed as blocked. – Sca (talk) 13:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Editor Sca announced that the nominating IP address 109.252.201.66 will be declared "persona non grata". WaltCip-(talk) 14:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - This may have the start of something larger in diplomacy, but this seems like a lot more of sabre-rattling and not a significant development. --Masem (t) 13:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Well, it got us talking about it, I suppose. But there's no geopolitical implications outside of this without having to resort to rubbing the crystal ball.--WaltCip-(talk) 14:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

October 22

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime


RD: Peter Scolari

edit
Article: Peter Scolari (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Variety, Fox News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Bosom Buddies (with Tom Hanks), Newhart actor. CoatCheck (talk) 20:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Udo Zimmermann

edit
Article: Udo Zimmermann (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Tagesspiegel
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: The third death today (news today, DOD could also be 21, or 15), leading composer and music organiser who was great in East Germany and managed to remain important after reunifaication. An article I had expanded before, not much work for a change. Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 21

edit

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

  • 2021 North Kosovo crisis
    • A working group to find a more permanent solution to the license plate issue, consisting of negotiators from the governments of Kosovo and Serbia, meet for the first time in Brussels. If negotiations are successful, the group will announce their proposals in 6 months. (Gazeta Tema)

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Halyna Hutchins

edit
Article: Halyna Hutchins (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  Ukrainian director of photography Halyna Hutchins is shot and killed in a prop gun incident on the set of her final film, Rust. (Post)
News source(s): Interfax, CBC, Variety
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Open deletion discussion is decidevley "keep" -- Andrei (talk) 18:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Martha Henry

edit
Article: Martha Henry (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBC News; Toronto Star; The Stratford Beacon Herald
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Mike McCoy (businessman)

edit
Article: Mike McCoy (businessman) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Dallas Morning News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: First reported today (October 21); died on October 17 (i.e. provable gap of at least two days). —Bloom6132 (talk) 11:57, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Amakuru and Bloom6132: I didn't really add much. I think there is still a hole -- we don't know what he did in the oil and gas industry after leaving the Cowboys. I think this is due to the nature of his business as a low-profile worker, drilling in the middle of nowhere and toiling away from the limelight (unlike running a large taxi company in one of the largest city in the world and being somewhat connected to Trump's circle like Freidman above). And I would argue that this is not a hole that is big enough to kill this nom. The obituary released by his family and friends did not mention much more, anyway. I take this to mean that there's simply not much to write about. --PFHLai (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Rust shooting accident

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Rust (upcoming film) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ American actor and film producer Alec Baldwin accidentally kills cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and injures director Joel Souza with a prop gun on the set of the film Rust. (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: The story is really a very unusual incident, which is top news in the media today. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Bernard Haitink

edit
Article: Bernard Haitink (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New York Times, Classic FM, Gramophone, Spiegel
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Famous Dutch conductor. Article already in fairly decent shape, needs a little bit of touching up and should be good to go. NorthernFalcon (talk) 02:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Einár

edit
Article: Einár (rapper) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [7], [8]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 --BabbaQ (talk) 01:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded it. And it has been deemed a Start article based on article content besides Discography.BabbaQ (talk) 01:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Have expanded the article further since above comments. Also added more sources.BabbaQ (talk) 07:38, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Have added some additional information. It’s long enough for RD inclusion now. BabbaQ (talk) 09:10, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi

edit
Article: Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Forbes
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Article updated and well sourced --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 10:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 20

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology


(Posted) RD: Jerry Pinkney

edit
Article: Jerry Pinkney (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.npr.org/2021/10/20/1047786312/jerry-pinkney-illustrator-obituary
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American illustrator and writer of children's books --PFHLai (talk) 15:35, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Hans Haselböck

edit
Article: Hans Haselböck (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Die Presse
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Influential organist, concerts in the world, teaching in Vienna over decades, pioneer of a new church music after the Vatican Council, - and no article in English until now! Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2021 Barbadian presidential election

edit
Article: 2021 Barbadian presidential election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Dame Sandra Mason (pictured) is elected as the first President of Barbados. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Barbados becomes a republic, with Parliament electing Sandra Mason (pictured) as the first President of Barbados
Alternative blurb II: ​ Ahead of Barbados becoming a republic, Parliament elects Sandra Mason as the country's first President
News source(s): BBC, Reuters
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: The former Governor-General will serve as President when Barbados becomes a republic. Joofjoof (talk) 23:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Change in head of state, and in system of government. Article is small (~start class) but cited throughout. I don't believe we should be using a title ("dame") in the blurb though but I could be wrong. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ 23:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - This is a bit trick to me. This seems to be a ceremonial position and an indirect election. Am I right?--Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 00:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, but it's also the election of the head of state who will succeed Queen Elizabeth when the Republic is established, so a little more significant than such elections would usually be. I'm personally mixed on whether or not it's ITN, or whether it would be better to wait until 30 November when the monarchy in Barbados officially ends, but I get why the conversation is occurring. Wizardoftheyear (talk) 00:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Not opposing, but I'd suggest waiting until 30 November, when the constitutional shift is to take place. Much bigger story. Moscow Mule (talk) 03:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The issue is important however the article looks not good. It should be improved.--Seyyed(t-c) 03:52, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I am broadly supportive of this. The article, while a bit short, is decent and the event is significant, but I do agree that it may make more sense to do it when the constitutional change actually takes effect. The blurb could also use revision to note that this is the first president of Barbados following Lizzie's removal. Melmann 07:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as it is notable that they are switching how their head of state is chosen. 331dot (talk) 09:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support whilst an unusual election, it's a change of head of state. Fine for it to run now, or on the 30th, which is when she becomes head of state. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:05, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I also support posting this in November with a combined blurb. --Tone 09:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • ’’’Support altblurb’’’ Proposed an altblurb that clarifies the significance
  • Oppose posting now, wait until November 30. This election does not seem notable to me. The current Governor-General was nominated and approved by parliament to be the first president-elect, which appears to be a mostly ceremmonial role similar to her current role as Governor-General. I don't think we post when ceremonial heads of state change in other countries. Like others I agree the notable event is becoming a republic, which happens November 30. Arstoien (talk) 16:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support for Nov 30 This is quite a big thing for Barbados. I like the alt blurb. Heythereimaguy (talk) 16:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support altblurb. It is in the news now, so it should be posted now. Waiting for arbitrary future dates when a story may or may not be in the news seems like a bad idea. If it's being covered now, we should post it now. --Jayron32 16:22, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support posting a blurb now, but I think altblurb is slightly misleading and the original blurb is insufficient. I think the best blurb would be one that says that Barbados is transitioning into a republic, but "Barbados becomes a republic" makes it sound like the change of government type is effective immediately. This is something they've been planning for over a year, and Parliament appointing their first president is just one of the last major steps in that process. I'd propose an altblurb myself but I'm not sure what the best way to word it is yet.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 19:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Added an altblurb II, similar to BBC headline. I bolded the link to Republicanism in Barbados rather than 2021 Barbadian presidential election because most seem to think the becoming a republic is the main story, not the election. Arstoien (talk) 23:43, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Sakharov Prize

edit
Article: Alexei Navalny (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Russian opposition activist Alexei Navalny (pictured) is awarded the Sakharov Prize. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Russian opposition activist Alexei Navalny (pictured) is awarded the Sakharov Prize for his contribution to protecting freedom of thought.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Opposition politician Alexei Navalny (pictured) is awarded the Sakharov Prize for his work against corruption in Russia.
News source(s): Euronews, dpa, DW (Eng.), WaPo, NPR, AFP (Via Yahoo), NYT (paywalled)
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Update currently may be small, but otherwise the article looks ok. Brandmeistertalk 15:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These two aren't too bad. [9] [10] Favor the first one. – Sca (talk) 18:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ongoing removal: COVID-19 pandemic

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: COVID-19 pandemic (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)
Article needs updating
Nominator's comments: Our oldest blurb is from October 14th. Since that day, nothing has been added to this article. Nothing at all. This plainly fails the Ongoing criteria the article needs to be regularly updated with new, pertinent information in every sense. If there is a specific article linked within this that is getting updates, then that article should be nominated for Ongoing. But we've had a static article featured on the Front Page for months that any interested reader has probably read many times over. If there is to be a specific carve-out for this particular article and Ongoing, please make a Talk section for it. I can't think of any non-IAR reason why this is still here. 130.233.213.141 (talk) 06:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support No longer an urgent developing story, overall, just became its own daily genre of mundane statistical reports, like weather, stocks or sports. New normal, as they say. Certainly doesn't need us to spotlight it anymore, if it ever did, the word's out. InedibleHulk (talk) 08:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose one would be hard-pressed to find a news outlet which doesn't publish COVID-related stories every day. Banedon (talk) 09:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support the requirement to stay on ongoing is that significant additions are being regularly made to an article. That isn't the case here, as there's barely any updates in October 2021. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - this is still the single dominant story worldwide, even a year and a half after it started, and it still kills thousands every day. We've always treated it as an exception to the "continual updates" rule, in the interests of providing a quick link to this ongoing story from the main page. And having it as an Ongoing item was already a compromise given that we previously had a dedicated box to it at the top of ITN, whose removal many editors opposed.  — Amakuru (talk) 09:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Amakuru. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 10:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The main reason why the article linked from ongoing doesn't receive regular updates is that it's already attained a stable version, and most of the daily updates are therefore done in its numerous sub-articles. If this is not enough to justify it, there are cases where we can invoke WP:IAR, and this is surely one of them. In the long run, we'll probably remove this from ongoing when WHO declares that the pandemic is over and post it in a blurb.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Given the unequal distribution of vaccines globally and the unequal vaccination rates across different regions of individual countries, it's unlikely that the WHO will declare the pandemic to be over any time soon. So we can't wait for such an announcement. The only criteria we can use is public interest which is still very high and will remain so for a while Scaramouche33 (talk) 10:24, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The pandemic is not only still going on, it's still front-page news in many (perhaps most?) countries. Coronavirus stories are currently the top item on the websites of the BBC, CBC, Guardian, New York Times, Süddeutsche Zeitung etc. Life has not returned to 'normal' in most places. I understand the argument that the article isn't receiving frequent updates, which has merit. The traffic is also down to 20,000 hits per day - not insubstantial but not as high as I thought it would be. The numerous sub-articles are being updated, so we could switch the link to a more active target, but then it would be difficult to decide which one and we would be missing parts of the story. We shouldn't penalise an event for being so big that it spawned dozens of articles. This is the biggest news story since ITN began; I think we can treat it as a special case and IAR. Modest Genius talk 12:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Per Banedon, Amakuru. The pandemic remains the paramount condition of life on Earth and as such is comprehensively covered by RS media worldwide on a daily basis. – Sca (talk) 12:08, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This is, quite literally, ongoing, and as others have said before, this is the biggest news story, and it's been so for over a year and a half. It would be wrong to remove this from Ongoing. Heythereimaguy (talk) 12:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - We can't wish COVID-19 away. Even if vaccines are now widely available, the ongoing supply chain issue caused by pandemic lockdowns is definitely still present and covered by RS.--WaltCip-(talk) 12:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The pandemic is ongoing and will be still for a long while. Sadly that link may remain there for a really long time but so be it. Rhino131 (talk) 12:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Amakuru.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 12:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Suggestion Would it be better to change the link to a piped link to Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in October 2021 which is fully referenced and regularly updated? We could just shift the link each month to the new month's timeline. Just a thought... --Jayron32 13:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, that's listed in the 'Series' box below the infobox. Perhaps it should be added to 'See also' list below the text? – Sca (talk) 13:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I would say no, at that would be an Easter Egg link. If we're keeping COVID-19 on ongoing, it should be the main article about it. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    A reasonable suggestion in principle, but in practice those timelines are a random selection of facts with little consistency and no coherent narrative. I doubt they would be of much use to readers. Modest Genius talk 13:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Still top news around the World. Change to "COVID-19 pandemic (October 2021)" to include an updated article without removing the main article. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Plenty of daily updates in subarticles of the topic - the top level is too broad for most of those to perculoate into that. --Masem (t) 13:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – The main problem with the Covid article is length – more than 18,000 words. That equates to some 70 pages of typescript, or over 500 column-inches of the newspaper type of yore. Maybe a contingent of courageous copy editors should set to work on paring it down somewhat? (Not that it's unimportant, it's just unwieldy.) – Sca (talk) 13:51, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose WP:IAR, much like the pandemic itself.—Bagumba (talk) 14:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

October 19

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime


(Posted) RD: Jean Rochon

edit
Article: Jean Rochon (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Global News / Canadian Press; CBC Radio-Canada (in French); La Presse (in French)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Only reported today (October 19); died on October 16 (i.e. provable gap of at least two days) —Bloom6132 (talk) 14:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) RD: Megan Rice

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Megan Rice (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT WaPo The Independent
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Anti-nuclear/peace activist and Catholic nun, most famous for breaching a nuclear storage facility aged 83, referred to as the biggest security breach in the history of the nation's atomic bomb complexjonas (talk) 15:47, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • When? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.189.58.81 (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note Article quality looks good EXCEPT 1) there is no prose explanation of her death, either the manner or location of it, except that there is a date of death in the parenthetical at the beginning 2) The date, Oct 10, is to old to be considered for current inclusion on the list, unless news of her death has only been more recently released, and the explanation of her death in the text should indicate such a discrepancy as well. --Jayron32 17:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • WaPo obit added by the nominator is dated the 11th. Suggest Close. 159.53.78.141 (talk) 18:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I see that this is the nominator's first nomination with WP:ITNC. I see that they have missed out by 1 day. I also see that the article is well-referenced and from the looks of it -- pretty much ready to make it to homepage / RD. As a one-time exception, I would request the Admins to consider this nomination, given that it is the nominator's first submission. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 20:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Russia-NATO relations

edit
Article: Russia–NATO relations (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Russia breaks off relations with NATO after NATO expels eight Russian diplomats for alleged espionage (Post)
News source(s): [11] [12] [13]
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Surprised that this hasn't been nominated, might need a better blurb though. Banedon (talk) 05:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Oppose All articles agree NATO dumped Russia in 2014 for messing with Crimea. Technically still something between them intermittently since, but hard to say exactly what; I think the average newsreader already considers them adversaries. That said, I'm willing to wait and see if an altblurb can put over the importance more decisively. InedibleHulk (talk) 16:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Check the source - NATO did not dump Russia in 2014, the two continued to exchange diplomats with one another. Banedon (talk) 02:13, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Meh. In the context of a supposed military alliance, occasional talk between a few dozen people in Belgium is pretty far estranged. Almost none of their talk described in the post-Crimea years of our article is even with each other, just about each other to their respective media partners. That won't change now, and neither will their complete lack of practical cooperation. Just fewer offices in Brussels going through the motions of...whatever it is happens daily there. Hard to say, but it certainly seems like pure formality. If a believable ally (like Denmark) suddenly ditched, that'd be hot news. But Russia's presence always was fairly conspicuous, no element of surprise left by 2021, in my opinion. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:05, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 18

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Health and environment

International relations

  • Russia announces that it will be suspending its mission to NATO in Brussels as early as November 1, in response to the expulsion of 8 diplomats accused of espionage from the mission earlier this month. The NATO information bureau and military liaison in Moscow will also be terminated. (CNN)

Law and crime

Science and technology

Sports


(Posted) RD: David Finn

edit
Article: David Finn (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times; PRWeek
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 02:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Edita Gruberová

edit
Article: Edita Gruberová (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Der Spiegel
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Stellar Slovak coloratura soprano who sang leading roles for 50 years, based at the Vienna State Opera. Farewell concerts cancelled due to pandemic. The article was rather well developed, and we are still at it, because she really deserves more, but it looks well sourced as it is. Enjoy. Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:11, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RD: János Kornai

edit
Article: János Kornai (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): HVG.hu Hungary Today
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Hungarian economist. Found this one in Deaths in 2021. Article requires some work including references. However, before we proceed, we should really look for additional news sources confirming death, unless we have a Hungarian editor who can confirm that the HVG.hu site is WP:RS. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 21:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Electron quadruplets - New state of matter

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Electron quadruplets (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Professor Egor Babaev and collaborators with the KTH Royal Institute of Technology publish an experiment showing evidence of a new state of matter called electron quadruplets. (Post)
News source(s): (Phys.org), (Mirage News),
Credits:
Nominator's comments: I feel like a new state of matter being discovered is big science news. Article is still a stub, so we might want to hold off on posting for a while, but I think this is 100% ITN worthy once the article is no longer a stub. Elijahandskip (talk) 21:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on Quality Article is two sentences long. However once the article gets expanded I think this is notable enough. Jbvann05 21:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – At a grand total of 46 words, this article seems to have been prematurely nominated. – Sca (talk) 22:28, 18 October 2021
  • Oppose as of now, very much a stub. Unsure of notability; there seem to be a lot of weird states.  Nixinova T  C   22:22, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as really really early in the discovery process. Yes, it's a peer-reviewed paper in a respected journal, and appears to have replicated experiments elsewhere, but even reading these news reports, they're not sure if these results conclusively give this answer, only that it continues to support this potential theory which has been around for a decade+. --Masem (t) 22:28, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions Is it visible? Tangible? Some "thing"? Is the thing in the Phys.org picture the matter? How is that not a solid, if so? InedibleHulk (talk) 00:30, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Technically, the new state of matter hasn't been directly observed yet. There was experiments done that show evidence that a new state of matter may exist, but it may not. Elijahandskip (talk) 02:48, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Source comment - The two attached sources in the article are press releases from the professor's university that have been re-printed as the outlets haven't written their own pieces yet Bumbubookworm (talk) 01:31, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    With science stuff it is different. The real information was published to Nature Physics, a big science journal. Also, the professor listed you could consider the "main author" of the research and information, but there is tons of Universities from different countries involved in this. Elijahandskip (talk) 02:48, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality as a single-source stub. I'm always unsure of when the right time to post a science story is, but this seems like something we could post at this point were the target article better. State of matter is currently largely uncited too otherwise I would suggest an update to it, which may still be feasible if someone with a science background is familiar with useful sources for it—I think we're more likely to get an update to that page than to get a main-page worthy article out of the new state in a timely fashion. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ 01:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Masem. I could just be ignorant here, so please correct me if I'm mistaken, but my understanding of the situation is that evidence has been found which could suggest that a new state of matter may exist, as opposed to researchers coming to the conclusion that a newly discovered state of matter does in fact exist (or that it most likely exists). I'm worried that posting a blurb about it would imply that the findings are more conclusive than they actually are.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 03:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Phys.org churns press releases. No article should ever be written with it as a starting point, let alone run on Wikipedia's main page with the most hyped-up possible description of the result presented as fact. Beyond that, it's not even in the news, having so far only been picked up by the typical press-release aggregators. "ITN" isn't short for "In the clickbait". XOR'easter (talk) 04:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality - We could never publish a two lines one source orange-tagged article on the Main Paige.--Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 05:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose the article isn't necessarily even notable enough to exist, no way it's notable enough for ITN. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Removed) Ongoing Removal: 2021 Cumbre Vieja volcanic eruption

edit
Article: 2021 Cumbre Vieja volcanic eruption (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)

Nominator's comments: A paragraph was added on Oct 8 to prevent removal and nothing pertinent since then. A few updates about lava flows and some trapped dogs. There was nothing between Oct 1 and Oct 8. There is a List of currently erupting volcanoes and for good reason we do not have every one of them in the ongoing section. Simply put, the article and the story are stale. Per the guidelines "In general, articles are NOT posted to ongoing merely because they are related to events that are still happening.". It is time for this one to come down. I've published an updated content diff if anyone wants to review the changes and highlight any new, pertinent information that I've missedLaserLegs (talk) 12:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support removal Even though the eruption is still going [14] it has lost the necessary interest of type of coverage that needs regular updating as to keep it in ongoing. This is an honest look at the news covering it, and while there's a story or three daily on it, its "yup, it's still going, still causing damage to the same parts of the island and we're still waiting for any big eruption", but otherwise like watching a teapot boil at this point. Should there be an actual destructive event, I can see a new blurb on that. If the eruption peters off, then that's it. --Masem (t) 13:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal Even more than the sparsity of updates, what convinced me is that all of them are sourced to local Canary Islands news sources, and almost all of them from a single source. In other words, not wide coverage.130.233.213.141 (talk) 13:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal there are updates as recently as yesterday (17 October), and some updates for almost every day in the last week. This is still ongoing therefore. There is continued coverage in other sources in the last few days: The Times (paywalled), CBS, Sky News. All of these sources could be used to expand it, and demonstrate there is more than just local coverage of the ongoing event. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:28, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • The problem is that the event is (literally) slow moving - there's still lava flow and the occasional quake, but the situation is not radically changing quickly as to necessitate updates that would have been ITN on a somewhat daily basis. Ongoing's not great for such slow-moving events either. As I noted, if there's a major event that happens, we can reconsider. --Masem (t) 13:37, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • The update on Oct-17 was one sentence about lava slowing and one about rescuing some dogs. Are five stranded dogs pertinent enough to keep a story in ongoing? --LaserLegs (talk) 13:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal The OP's diff table is huge – over 200K – and so tends to prove the opposite. The intensity seems to be getting stronger, as reported in the news – Lava tsunami; No end in sight; More cancelled flights; Drones deliver food to dogs. And it's not like the space is needed for anything else – we'd just be printing white space otherwise. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal. I'm updating this regularly - am trying for updating it daily. Saying that it was only updated on the 8th and no updates since is clearly incorrect per the article history (compare this with the other 'Ongoing' at the moment, last had a big non-bot edit on the 20th September). There are regular news stories about the progress of the volcano - the one I follow most is Canarian Weekly, so that's what I tend to reference, but there are others I could reference as well (e.g., El Pais has a whole section on its English front page dedicated to the volcano). Suggestions / messages about gaps would be really useful on the article talk page please (as would a notice about this discussion!). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:28, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal all the time people are reminding us that this is still "in the news" and posting links, but I'm not seeing any real encyclopedic content being added. Sure, the date formats have been tweaked and I think one sentence was added today by Mike Peel, but neither the "number of edits" nor the size of the diff table give any indication as to the quality of the updates being made. This is so boring to explain ITNR each and every time, and this one in particular. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 14:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'll just reply by saying "Don't let anyone bully you away from contributing whatever you like, however you want. Stay strong and don't be dissuaded." Will do my best to do that, despite how all the ITNR discussions seem to be surprisingly stressful. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • That completely misses the point, and fair play, you added a sentence, and that was literally the highlight. Anyone can edit anything in any constructive fashion, yes, but unless it's maintaining a series of high quality, ongoing edits to an item listed in Ongoing, that item isn't meeting the requirements for Ongoing any longer. Don't make it about you, it's not. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 15:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • A sentence today (so far), two sentences yesterday, a sentence the day before .... Mike Peel (talk) 15:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
          • Like I said, your contributions are the highlight. As Laserlegs enquires though, are we keeping an article on the main page because of five stranded dogs? Is that really the mission of the encyclopedia? The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 15:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
            • See my reply to them, just above, giving three key developments that have either happened since the last discussion, or are pending. Note that none of them were about dogs. Mike Peel (talk) 15:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
              • "key" developments? Ok. My !vote stands. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 15:17, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
              • Those additions/stories are part of this being a very "slow-moving" (in both literal and theoretical sense) news story. There is a slow-rising but small uptick in continued damage to the island but unless a sudden eruption/quake happens, no one's lives are at danger at this point, and everyone is just waiting either for it to peter off or for the cautioned "big" event, which if that happened, would certainly create a flurry of news. Keeping something that is just having this trickle of news in ongoing is not helpful because it is meant for stories where we'd likely to have otherwise have blurbs on a near-daily basis. --Masem (t) 15:22, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove While there are some small updates being made from time to time, the article is no longer up to quality (all new additions are a WP:PROSELINE mess) and major news sources are no longer featuring this prominently. --Jayron32 16:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Quality can definitely been improved (it's been interesting to see the flurry of edits by other editors today). Whether major news sources cover it likely depends on which country you are in and what language they use, sadly. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question When was the last time something happened that is more significant than the non-posted List of currently erupting volcanoes? GreatCaesarsGhost 17:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I've taken this one to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of currently erupting volcanoes due to serious structural problems. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove: Volcanoes can easily go on erupting for months, doing little bits of damage here and there. That doesn't make them front-page news. Perhaps editors have enjoyed seeing lava fall into swimming-pools or something entertainingly tweetworthy. That doesn't justify being on the front page either. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    That makes them ongoing events. Your sarcasm isn't appreciated. Mike Peel (talk) 19:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The point of the ongoing line is to displace the need to have blurbs on the same event over and over again (eg like Olympic or World Cup results). That means there needs to be events that are blurb-worthy to be happening in the event, which the ongoing eruption is not generating. --Masem (t) 19:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    This doesn't align with what Ongoing is all about. Otherwise we should 2021–22 Premier League on there, right? It's "in the news" around the world and is an ongoing event, albeit with relatively trivial events (watched nonetheless by millions across the globe), sounds like we need that here right now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:37, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair enough, this is turning into a debate about what 'Ongoing' is fundamentally about - I think we should be doing much more there, but that's a topic for another venue. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Mike Peel indeed. Ongoing is an oddball at the moment, oft-misunderstood from its initial instantiation. By all means, and I mean this, please make proposal(s) at WT:ITN on how to improve the way it "works"? And thanks for your efforts on this article, I feel I may not have been clear that your contributions really stood out amongst the hundreds of tweaks. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:49, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Mike Peel's commendable effort. Others too... 108.46.31.187 (talk) 21:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal -- trivial and no longer generating sufficiently noteworthy coverage to remain in Ongoing. -- Rockstone[Send me a message!] 23:08, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal. This isn't to say nothing is currently happening or that there isn't a steady flow of updates, but merely that the ongoing updates are not at the level where, in isolation, they might warrant their own blurb, and as I understand it that's what the ongoing ticker is meant to represent. It's not one blurb-worthy event strung along for as long as it's happening (or surely we'd still have the last US election up there for how long it's still being contested), but one listing for a series of what might otherwise be blurb-worthy posts (the covid pandemic is a good example of this--we could have a blurb for every new case/death milestone, or new vaccine, or new variant detected, etc, but we collapse them all down into one ongoing listing). And since the current state of this event is no longer at the point where a day's events would be independently worthy of listing, I can't support it remaining as an ongoing item. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ 23:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal, as updates are ongoing to the article, and Mike Peel is doing good work on it.Jackattack1597 (talk) 00:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Andrew has been showing persistent signs of WP:OWN about including this on ITN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.8.114.34 (talk) 02:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal Should have never been added. Lots of things that get blurbs have "ongoing" impacts, doesn't mean we keep them posted forever. GreatCaesarsGhost 02:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal per Jayron and Grapple X. The is the fundamental problem with the ongoing section; this should have been posted as an item and allowed to age off, rather than being directly posted to Ongoing.. SpencerT•C 03:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove. Not much is happening, media interest has passed. Yes the eruption hasn't stopped, but ongoing impact is low. Modest Genius talk 11:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove – From what we've see it appears this eruption could go on for a very long time without great change. If something really significant happened we could consider it then. – Sca (talk) 12:15, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove - The article was never really at an acceptable level and hasn't gotten better since it was put in ongoing. Key problems are that it is almost all a proseline and that it lacks an effective explanation of either the geographic or geologic setting of the eruption. I keep meaning to fix these deficits, but I have been saying "I'll fix it tonight" for 2 weeks and haven't done anything. Rockphed (talk) 12:59, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Removed from ongoing. --Tone 19:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted to RD) RD: Colin Powell

edit
Article: Colin Powell (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell (pictured) dies at age 84. (Post)
News source(s): CNN, AP, AP, BBC, LA Times, DW, NYT
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Former US secretary of state Vacant0 (talk) 12:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Bandula Warnapura

edit
Article: Bandula Warnapura (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Papare
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: First captain of Sri Lanka's Test cricket team. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) The International 2021

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: The International 2021 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In Dota 2 Esports, Team Spirit wins the 10th International taking home $18,208,300, the largest prize in esports history. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Esports, Team Spirit wins the 10th International defeating PSG.LGD in the finals.
Alternative blurb II: ​ In Esports, Team Spirit wins the 10th International defeating Paris Saint Germain LGD in the finals.
Alternative blurb III: ​ In Esports, Russian Team Spirit wins the 10th International defeating Chinese PSG.LGD in the finals.
News source(s): MSN Yahoo GMA
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: The article is in a great shape. It's high time we start posting major e-sports (at least the International) to ITN. Especially when half the sport postings right now consider sports such as Cricket and whatnot that have infinately smaller followings world wide than championships like the International with it's tens of millions of concurrent viewers --Daikido (talk) 08:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose WP:ROUTINE as yearly event in a niche area. We do not post winners of the National Lottery or Love Island either despite its huge participation and following.Abcmaxx (talk) 09:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose this event is not covered in many mainstream sources, and so is not important enough for ITN, as it's way too niche. And the nominator is wrong about half the sport postings right now consider sports such as Cricket and whatnot that have infinately smaller followings world wide than championships like the International, as the IPL, which is on front page now, had 380 million viewers this year [15]. Although WP:OSE applies anyway, we should focus on this article, which isn't ITN-worthy. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    >this event is not covered in many mainstream sources ; Neither are cricket, or whatever pollo, or even less popular sports that get posted yearly. And way fewer people care about those than about the international Daikido (talk) 09:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment Truly terrible comparison. Cricket is a 200 year old sport and is definitely well covered in all mainstream news outlets in places that play this sport. Gaming, whilst popular, is still struggling to be even recognised as a sport. Lots of people care about Strictly Come Dancing and Great British Bake Off, we still do not post the winners of those "sporting" competitions. Abcmaxx (talk) 09:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    (ec) Cricket is in the mainstream news where it is popular. Cricket is popular in India and Pakistan, where over 1/7 of the population of this planet lives. No sources have been offered indicating this is in the mainstream news anywhere. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    "Cricket is not covered in mainstream sources": wrong. [16], [17], [18] from a 30 second check. The International in the other hand is a competition that most people have never heard of. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. (ec) No sources offered indicating this is in the news. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Had a look to try finding mainstream sources but nothing's showing up other than dedicated gaming sources, many of which would not meet WP:RS. Is that perhaps a journalistic problem, that they aren't covering something with "tens of millions of concurrent viewers"? Probably. But it's also indicative of this not being something we're able to post either at this point. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ 10:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Hold up for a second. This is a new article of good quality, which is job #1. It is being covered extensively in a large number of reliable sources. Lots of editors seeking "mainstream coverage" which is not an agreed upon standard here - go find mainstream coverage for the Cape Verde election where sure to post soon. Also the pageview count is comparable with IPL - people are looking for this. Clearly the nominator triggered a bunch of you with a really bad argument, but the is not about them. Consider the nominated article. GreatCaesarsGhost 11:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Please offer some of these sources. 331dot (talk) 11:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    My question as a reader is, the international what? – Sca (talk) 12:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    And why does a developer-sponsored tournament for one of their own games, clearly to promote the game, merit this attention? Why this game? 331dot (talk) 12:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC) [reply]
    We are not here to decide what merits attention. We follow RS. GreatCaesarsGhost 12:21, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    If that were true, we would have posted Shatner, which was actually in mainstream news. This tournament is just one expensive advertisement for their game. 331dot (talk) 13:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    In addition to the three mainstream sources above, here are additional sources that have been evaluated positively at WP:RSN: [19] [20] [21] GreatCaesarsGhost 12:21, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Computer gaming is a major cultural pastime which ITN under-represents (mind you, so is television). However e-sports are a minority pursuit within gaming and this particular tournament has received coverage only in specialist gaming outlets (IGN, PCGamer etc.) and does not appear to have been broadcast on any mainstream television channels. That's not enough to merit an ITN blurb. Valve streaming people playing their own game is good marketing, not a genuine sport. In addition, the article is mostly results tables, with no prose on the actual play or outcome. The comparison with cricket is laughable - that sport has over a billion active fans and 300 million current players [22]. e-sports are nowhere near that level. Modest Genius talk 12:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Are we really all on here seriously suggesting that all of e-sports in 2021 is a niche interest? That one of it's biggest events, following by millions around the world, is a sales promotion of the game's corporate owner? GreatCaesarsGhost 12:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I am suggesting both of those things. Modest Genius talk 11:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Esports are far from niche, given it is a >$1B market within a $200B market of video games. Esports are more likely to use streaming media than broadcast, so that should not be the factor here. The International has been reported on by mainstream news in the past, but this year, being the first back as a live event after COVID (and even then, limited due to venue changes and a limited live audience due to COVID restrictions) it has not be noted yet by any major sources, and in fact I was waiting myself for some before nominating (the ones given aren't the ones I'd have used). So would tend to agree that right it fails the normal "in the news" test for this specific event, but calling esports "minor" greatly misrepresents their role relative to video games when it comes to what would be an ITN aspect. --Masem (t) 12:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The global market for cable cars is >$3 billion, soap is >$30 billion, and yoga is $90 billion. That doesn't mean we should be posting them in ITN. Your explanation for the lack of media interest is just special pleading. Modest Genius talk 11:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not pleading about this being posting, I am opposing it still since there's no mainstream coverage of the event still as of today. But I do oppose calling it a niche sport considering some of the other athletic ITNRs we post. --Masem (t) 14:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I think a discussion of an update to WP:ROUTINE is in order - though there will be the question of which ones are notable: Overwatch World Cup? League of Legends World Championship? Pokémon World Tournament? etc. Plus, most Esports by design of the games don’t last more than a decade or so - at least none of note yet. Regarding media coverage, I’d say the more famous events are more covered than the less covered ITNR ones like The Boat Race or America's Cup. Juxlos (talk) 12:51, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I've been arguing for years that the Boat Race should be removed. Modest Genius talk 11:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I think I actually opened a discussion around a year or so ago about which possible video game esports would be potential ITN topics. The International would definitely be one of them, but there absolutely has to be non-specialized coverage. Mainstream sources have covered The International before, so that's my expectation here. --Masem (t) 13:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - E-sports in its current form will never get posted to ITN.--WaltCip-(talk) 12:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    This event was actually posted in 2016 and 2017. Can't link the archives because of the [] issue, but they're in the August 2016 and August 2017 sections. Banedon (talk) 13:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    We also blurbed the death of Carrie Fisher in that time, so the bar has certainly risen.  – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 17:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Largely absent from RS main sites. Lacks general significance. – Sca (talk) 13:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Purely due to no prose Results. To answer above concerns: there's no less than 6 RSs covering this, including very widely-read ones like MSN and Yahoo. I would like a genuine answer as to why these are not considered RSs, or why they are considered "specialized". There's a double superlative here: largest prize ever for an E-sport tournament and largest prize pool ever. I think that's enough to justify notability ex-ITNR. Asking why the developer is hosting a tournament is just silly. Who organizes FIFA? A group of disinterested parties?130.233.213.141 (talk) 13:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I think the more apt comparison would be if the World Cup was organised by Adidas to advertise the Telstar 18; as for "not RS", I was referring to searching for broad coverage, which brings up Wikipedia, "Liquipedia", and Dota 2's homepage before any news sources. I have no issue with Yahoo but it was absent at the time. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ 13:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait untill we see coverage in more news outlets. BBC, CNN, Euronews, Al-Jazeera, South China Morning Post seem to be completely silent on the topic Scaramouche33 (talk) 13:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Even as someone who plays video games, I cringe a bit when people try and put them up at the level of other sports, but the reality being Esports certainly can reach a level of notability that rivals other sports. The reason that nominations for ITN as far as Esports goes simply aren't up to snuff is kinda similar to some of the combat sports where you have to factor in the significance of every event. For example, if there was a single annual tournament recognizes as THE title event for a wide range of competitive games then that would certainly be worthy of ITN, but does Dota 2 Esports alone have enough significance? No, so that's my vote (and I would hope this sort of policy becomes precedent at some point) DarkSide830 (talk) 15:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose E-Sports is nowhere near the level of most actual sports and hasn't been covered in widespread media nearly enough. As an aside, cricket is regarded by many as the second most popular sport in the world and the last World Cup had 2.6 billion viewers and 8 million watched the final just from the UK. Terrible comparison. Jbvann05 16:48, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose 15000 page views per day isn't enough to make the "page views" argument. A better topic for DYK. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 16:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Support I do agree with the idea that it's about time we start including some e-sports. E-sports are sports, and we have no problem posting sports to ITN. E-sports have large audiences, large revenues, and large purses. In some countries (Korea) e-sports attract a bigger audience than some sports on ITN/R. The only thing we're really lacking is an objective way to evaluate e-sports to determine which ones are ready to join the list of sports on ITN/R and which ones are not yet there. I don't have a solution for that, but hopefully someone else does. In terms of this specific blurb, however, the biggest purse in e-sports history pushes this into weak support territory for me, since purse size is one potential objective indicator of significance; but I'm open to hearing arguments either way. NorthernFalcon (talk) 18:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not convinced esports are a sport, but whatever they are called, there is no objective event held to determine who is the best- these events are usually held by gamemakers as promotional events for their individual games. 331dot (talk) 11:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Absent from main RS sites. Significance not apparent. Suggest close. – Sca (talk) 14:12, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Earthshot Prize

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Earthshot Prize (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The country of Costa Rica is among the winners of the first ever Earthshot Prizes. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, NYTimes
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Article is updated. Sherenk1 (talk) 05:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Sean Wainui

edit
Article: Sean Wainui (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Stuff
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: NZ rugby player. Start class, mostly referenced.  Nixinova T  C   02:47, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 17

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Ernie Ross

edit
Article: Ernie Ross (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News; The Herald; The Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 12:25, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Brendan Kennelly

edit
Article: Brendan Kennelly (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News; The Irish Times; Irish Independent
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 23:35, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Thomas & Uber Cup

edit
Article: 2020 Thomas & Uber Cup (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In badminton, Indonesia and China respectively win the Thomas & Uber Cup in Aarhus, Denmark. (Post)
News source(s): [23]
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 Juxlos (talk) 12:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment needs some sort of summary of the tournaments. Right now, for the tournament itself, we only have tables and knockout brackets, but this is insufficient article quality for an ITN posting. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Virtually the entire article is cited to primary sources (BWF and regional bodies) or something called "tournament software" which does not have any indication of being a reliable, independent source. GreatCaesarsGhost 02:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not ready. There is no prose at all on what happened at the tournament. There needs to be at least one fully-referenced paragraph describing the event, who won etc. We never post articles that are just results tables. Modest Genius talk 13:01, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Two days later, still no prose. Modest Genius talk 12:36, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Two more days later, no changes. --PFHLai (talk) 14:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2021 Cape Verdean presidential election

edit
Article: 2021 Cape Verdean presidential election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: PAICV candidate José Maria Neves is elected President of Cape Verde. (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: With 97% of the of votes counted, it's almost sure that Neves will be elected. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 22:14, 17 October 2021 (UTC) PS: Several Portuguese media outlets (see here, here) are reporting Neves as the winner.--Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 00:08, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 16

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology


(Posted) RD: Hiroshi Ono

edit
Article: Hiroshi Ono (artist) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NME
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Video game artist, known for a lot of pixel art on early arcade games. Hadn't had time to get a good article developed on sources post-death but clearly notable for things he did before death. Masem (t) 22:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Dennis Franks

edit
Article: Dennis Franks (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Detroit News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 07:47, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Betty Lynn

edit
Article: Betty Lynn (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Associated Press; CNN; USA Today
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 07:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Leo Boivin

edit
Article: Leo Boivin (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NHL.com; Ottawa Citizen; Sports Illustrated
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 04:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Striketober

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Striketober (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, France24, New York, NPR, NBC News
Credits:
Nominator's comments: One of the largest labor strike waves in the United States in the nation's recent history. Hundreds of thousands of workers in the United States are participating or planning for strikes. This includes the 2021 John Deere strike, 2021 Kellogg's strike and 2021 IATSE strike.--WMrapids (talk) 04:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Alan Hawkshaw

edit
Article: Alan Hawkshaw (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Composer of the Countdown theme. Needs quite a bit of work. Blythwood (talk) 22:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 15

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime


Article: Shenzhou 13 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ China successfully launches Shenzhou 13, carrying the second crew for the Tiangong space station. (Post)
Credits:
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Crewed orbital launches are ITNR. And for a non-Western launch, this article is in good shape to go on the main page. 2A02:2F0E:DB04:D300:8C40:6AAF:4CDF:C428 (talk) 00:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Gerd Ruge

edit
Article: Gerd Ruge (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Die Zeit; Der Spiegel
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German journalist, author and filmmaker. He was considered a reporter legend. Grimes2 (talk) 15:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Tropical Storm Kompasu

edit
Article: Tropical Storm Kompasu (2021) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Severe Tropical Storm Kompasu kills 40 people in the Philippines and Hong Kong. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Severe Tropical Storm Kompasu causes severe agricultural damage and flooding in the Philippines, killing 39 people.
News source(s): AlJazeera, DW
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Caused nearly php3 billion in agricultural damage in the Philippines. Will likely be retired. Destroyer (Alternate account) 21:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2021 Indian Premier League Final

edit
Article: 2021 Indian Premier League Final (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In cricket, Chennai Super Kings win the Indian Premier League. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In cricket, the Indian Premier League concludes with Chennai Super Kings defeating Kolkata Knight Riders in the final.
News source(s): ESPNCricinfo
Credits:

Article needs updating
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: ITNR. Article requires some prose updates and should be ready soon. Prose added. Article looks good for homepage. Ktin (talk) 17:57, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Killing of David Amess

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Killing of David Amess (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ British Member of Parliament Sir David Amess (pictured) dies after being stabbed during a constituency meeting. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, The Guardian, CNN, AP, Reuters, BBC (2), Sydney Morning Herald
Credits:
Nominator's comments: The story is developing so the target article isn't quite up to date. I believe this is newsworthy regardless of the severity of his injuries. We did post the Congressional baseball shooting in 2017 for reference. -- Calidum 13:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Beirut clashes

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2021 Beirut clashes (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In Beirut, a series of violent clashes leave 6 people killed and 32 injured. (Post)
News source(s): Al Jazeera NYT CNN
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Worst street violence in Lebanon since 2008. Notable enough. TootsieRollsAddict (talk to me pls I am lonely) 00:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

October 14

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

  • Brazil's Central Bank sells US$1 billion to offset declines in the real, which has fallen ⅓ relative to the dollar in 2021 alone, with another US$1 billion in sales scheduled for later today. (Mercopress)
  • LinkedIn announces that it will shut down its social media services in China later this year, citing heavy-handed compliance requirements from the government, and will replace it with a traditional job-listing site. LinkedIn was the only major Western-based social media site to legally operate within the country prior to the announcement. (BBC News)

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Joseph Kofi Adda

edit
Article: Joseph Kofi Adda (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.myjoyonline.com/former-aviation-minister-joseph-kofi-adda-has-died/
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Ghanaian politician. Former MP and cabinet minister. The wikibio looks long enough and clean enough now, but it could use more info on what he did in his 3 stints as a cabinet minister. --PFHLai (talk) 08:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Lee Wan-koo

edit
Article: Lee Wan-koo (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Yonhap News
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Briefly PM of South Korea. PFHLai (talk) 19:26, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Diane Weyermann

edit
Article: Diane Weyermann (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Los Angeles Times; Variety; Sundance Institute
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 06:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2021 Kaohsiung tower fire

edit
Article: 2021 Kaohsiung tower fire (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In southern Taiwan, a tower fire in Kaohsiung leaves 46 dead and 41 injured. (Post)
News source(s): Taiwan News, Focus Taiwan, DW, Al Jazeera, New York Times. AP, BBC, Reuters
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: deadliest building fire in taiwan since 1995. work in progress. dying (talk) 14:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 13

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Science and technology

Sports


RD: Timuel Black

edit
Article: Timuel Black (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 16:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Gary Paulsen

edit
Article: Gary Paulsen (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Thanks to Οἶδα, this is ready to go. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 18:12, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Ray Fosse

edit
Article: Ray Fosse (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NBC Sports
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 – Muboshgu (talk) 01:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Kongsberg attack

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Kongsberg attack (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Five people are killed, and two others injured inside a supermarket by a man using a bow and arrows in Kongsberg, Viken, Norway. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Five people are killed and two others injured in a bow-and-arrow attack inside a supermarket in Kongsberg, Norway.
News source(s): BBC, CNN, Sky News, AP, The Guardian, Independent, New York Times, Reuters
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: The article is still a stub. Also, I don't know if the number of deaths are enough to warranty its publication on the MP, but yet I think it's worth to nominate it. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 23:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

After reviewing the Aftenpost report, I think the Omholt 'quote' is more likely the newspaper's paraphrase of what he said, to wit: The hypothesis that has been strengthened so far is that he has done this all by himself, Omholt said.Sca (talk) 14:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want the exact wording, this is a transcript (by me, pardon the spelling) from the police press conference: Omholt: Etterforskningen så langt styrker hypotesen om att han kanske inte gjort detta väldigt seriöst. Så altså hypotesen om att han har konverterat till Islam är svekked. I'm sure this will be in print in a reliable source and quoted correctly if we just wait a while. cart-Talk 14:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm. Bing translates that as: "The investigation so far reinforces the hypothesis that he may have done so. So the hypothesis that he has converted to Islam is weakened." Confusing. (I don't speak Norwegian.) – Sca (talk) 16:42, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DW (Deutsche Welle) translates a quote from Omholt this way: "The thinking is that he did not take (the conversion) very seriously. By this we mean that he did not follow or practice the traditions that are common in this [Islam] culture and religion." – Sca (talk) 21:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Myriam Sarachik

edit
Article: Myriam Sarachik (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYTimes
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American Physicist. Death announced in WP:RS today. Obituaries have started appearing and there is good material to build this into a neat article. If someone wants to get to this before me, please feel free to do so. Ktin (talk) 23:28, 13 October 2021 (UTC) Ktin (talk) 23:28, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) William Shatner in space

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: William Shatner (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At the age of 90, William Shatner becomes the oldest man to fly to space. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The Blue Origin NS-18 spaceflight is launched, carrying William Shatner, the oldest person to reach space.
News source(s): CNN NBC News BBC Independent CBC
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Captain Kirk is going boldly 86.187.160.91 (talk) 14:18, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Agnes Jebet Tirop ​

edit
Article: Agnes Jebet Tirop (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [34], [35]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Death unexplained, world record holder. Could do with some more info on 2017-2020 achievements Joseph2302 (talk) 13:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 12

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Science and technology


(Posted) RD: David Kennedy (advertising)

edit
Article: David Kennedy (advertising) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): OregonLive
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American advertising executive. Just do it. American advertising executive. Death announced in WP:RS on this day. Article needs some work. I will work on it. If someone wants to lend a hand, jump right-in. Edits and article expansion done. Article has shaped into a nice C-class biography. Meets expectation for homepage / RD. Ktin (talk) 20:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Brian Goldner

edit
Article: Brian Goldner (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Reuters; NBC News; Variety
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 08:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A giant comet is discovered (picture) heading for the inner solar system. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, Independent, National Geographic, NYT
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: Great comets are ITN/R. This is unusual in that, while it is comparatively huge, it has been spotted a long way out and so it will be 10 years before its closest approach. This is not the usual brief 15 minutes of fame but, as we're an encyclopedia with a long view, we should report this at some point. Do we want to wait until 2031? Andrew🐉(talk) 21:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 
This NOIRLAb illustration is free and so would be a good picture too.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Tony DeMarco

edit
Article: Tony DeMarco (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [36]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Boxing world welterweight champion and international boxing hall of fame member Antonio el vagabundo Martin (aqui) 16:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Marie Wilcox

edit
Article: Marie Wilcox (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Last fluent speaker of Wukchumni, according to most sources. Died some days ago, making the news only this week. Vanamonde (Talk) 14:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 11

edit

Arts and culture

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Enamul Haque (actor)

edit
Article: Enamul Haque (actor) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.thedailystar.net/news/news/dr-enamul-haque-no-more-2195856
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Actor, playwright and chemistry professor in Dhaka. --PFHLai (talk) 21:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Emiliano Aguirre

edit
Article: Emiliano Aguirre (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): El Mundo
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Notable Spanish paleontologist, considered by the press as the "father of Atapuerca". _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 21:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Long enough and has enough refs for the prose. However, the Works section could use some more sourcing, and the final item appears to require fixing (why is the "subst:" appearing there twice?). --PFHLai (talk) 23:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Paddy Maloney

edit
Article: Paddy Moloney (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times, The Times, RTE
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Prominent Irish musician and founder of The Chieftains {{u|Sdkb}}talk 23:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Updated 09:23, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RD: David H. DePatie

edit
Article: David H. DePatie (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Seattle Times, Deadline Hollywood
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Co-creator of the Pink Panther. Died on Sept 23, but was only first reported on this date by the Seattle Times (local paper). Some sourcing issues. Masem (t) 16:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comments: This wikibio is long enough and has enough footnotes, except for the 2nd paragraph in the Career section. Perhaps this paragraph should be cleaned before getting the link onto RD. Furthermore, it seems a bit odd that there was no mention of The Pink Phink, which won DePatie the producer an Oscar, and his 3 Emmys (per IMDb). These things seem to be big deals for his profession and IMO should be covered in his wikibio. --PFHLai (talk) 03:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Deon Estus

edit
Article: Deon Estus (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Detroit Free Press; Billboard; CNN
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Bloom6132 (talk) 11:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2021 Boston Marathon

edit
Article: 2021 Boston Marathon (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At the Boston Marathon, Diana Kipyogei and Benson Kipruto win the women's and men's foot races, respectively. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Diana Kipyogei and Benson Kipruto win the 2021 Boston Marathon women's and men's races
News source(s): Boston Globe, NY Times
Credits:

Article needs updating
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 00:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Stewart Murray Wilson

edit
Article: Stewart Murray Wilson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NZ Herald
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: New Zealander criminal. Do criminals also qualify for RD? - Indefensible (talk) 21:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Nedumudi Venu

edit
Article: Nedumudi Venu (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian actor. Unfortunately, has an entire section on filmography that might be a challenge to source. Go well sir. Thanks for all the performances. Condolences to the family and friends. RIP. Ktin (talk) 19:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Nobel Economics Prize

edit
Articles: David Card (talk · history · tag) and Joshua Angrist (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Nobel Prize in Economics is awarded to David Card's work on labor economics, and jointly to Joshua Angrist and Guido Imbens for their work on causal relationships. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The Nobel Prize in Economics is awarded to David Card for his work in labour economics, and jointly to Joshua Angrist and Guido Imbens for their work in causal relationships.
Alternative blurb II: David Card, Joshua Angrist, and Guido Imbens are jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics.
News source(s): CNBC
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Last Nobel. Three target articles. Card's needs a few more sources. I'm getting "pulled from CV"-vibes from Angrists. Imbens is short and could be expanded. Masem (t) 13:14, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 60th Anniversary Additional Commemorative Non-Aligned Meeting

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 60th Anniversary Additional Commemorative Non-Aligned Meeting (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ 60th Anniversary Non-Aligned Movement Meeting brought together Third World leaders commemorating 1961 1st Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement in Belgrade SFR Yugoslavia (Post)
 MirkoS18 00:25 11 October 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

October 10

edit

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

  • Thirty people storm a hospital in Rome, Italy, trying to free an injured man under arrest due to his involvement in violent acts yesterday during an anti-Green Pass protest. Four people are injured during the incident. (The State)
  • The personal doctor of Georgian politician Mikheil Saakashvili says that he needs hospital treatment as he continues his hunger strike after returning from exile and being arrested on October 1. Saakashvili's condition has been described as "worsening". (Reuters)

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Luis de Pablo

edit
Article: Luis de Pablo (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ABC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Influential self-taught composer who connected Spanish music - oppressed under Franco - back to European developments, - some of the article written by Jerome Kohl. - As below: I added the recent refs and some facts. Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:52, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Evelyn Richter

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Ruthie Tompson

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Ramon Barba

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Closed) Russian plane crash

edit

Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate

Template:Abot

(Posted) 2021 Czech legislative election

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted to RD) Abdul Qadeer Khan

edit

Template:ITN candidate

  • Support blurb - He was considered as the father of Pakistan's nuclear bomb. Moreover, as a person who was embroiled in controversy there's bound to be some neutrality issues in the article which shouldn't stop it from getting posted. - Depressed Desi (talk) 07:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb too. His role in nuclear proliferation has shaped post-cold war Asia. —Brigade Piron (talk) 10:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The orange neutrality tag in the Proliferation controversy section must be addressed before this nom can proceed. --PFHLai (talk) 11:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC) Can someone familiar with the subject review that section and remove the orange tag (if appropriate), please? Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 13:38, 10 October 2021 (UTC) The tag has been removed. --PFHLai (talk) 20:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional support for RD, oppose blurb. He doesn't warrant a blurb, but an RD is fine if the quality-related problems (there are several tags highlighting various problems) are resolved. --Tataral (talk) 11:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb Template:Snd Sudden death of a very well known personality warrants blurb. I don't see any neutrality issue with Abdul Qadeer Khan#Proliferation controversy section, everything is well referenced. Radioactive (talk) 12:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • RD only – Per Tataral. – Sca (talk) 13:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose On quality and neutrality. The subject's main point of notoriety is his involvement in nuclear proliferation and that being tagged as POV should be a no go. I will note other areas where information is lacking or missing. While he is known as the father of Pakistan's nuclear bomb it should be noted that he is a metallurgist not a nuclear physicist (there the credit goes to Munir Khan), his main area of expertise being in his acquisition of centrifugal tech and his organizational capabilities (the AQ Khan network through which he transferred nuclear tech). His life in the Netherlands is lacking with the major Urenco "espionage" episode sidelined in the article with no mention of Frits Veerman (the whistleblower who uncovered it). His Dutch wife is not mentioned at all. The major overlaps come in the proliferation episode especially the dealings with Iran and N. Korea, with Iran no mention of the Shahid Bagheri Industrial Group (through which the proliferation happened) is made, with N. Korea (and China) the proliferation happened through Japanese companies which is missing. A look at the Britannica, SNL, and the nl/ko/ja/de/fr wikis should make it clear where the info is lacking/slanted. I have tried fixing some technical issues but the ones mentioned remain. Gotitbro (talk) 14:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb - An Important figure in Pakistan who was embodied in controversy at home (considered a hero, then a traitor then at death a hero) and abroad. As the BBC says 'AQ Khan: The most dangerous man in the world?' [38]
  • Support, as he was a major metallurgist involved in Pakistan's nuclear program.Jackattack1597 (talk)
  • Support RD, oppose blurb - article seems to meet requirements for normal RD posting but does not meet the threshold for a blurb entry. - Indefensible (talk) 18:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb Blurbs for recent deaths are supposed to be rare. This individual does not come close to the significance required. Pawnkingthree (talk) 19:20, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - The global attention his death has received and the fact that he was given a state-funeral definitely warrants a blurb. (See: The Guardian, BBC, NYT, WSJ, WaPo, CNN, AJ, The Hindu, Reuters, France24, DW) - Depressed Desi (talk) 21:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted to RD, there is no consensus likely to emerge for a blurb. Stephen 04:35, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Removed from Ongoing, Restored) 2021 Cumbre Vieja volcanic eruption

edit

Template:ITN candidate

Only commenting that the actual event is still going on at least as of yesterday's news, so the lack of updates is a problem. --Masem (t) 01:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 9

edit

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2021 October 9 Template:Cob


RD: Hosea Macharinyang

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Farooq Feroze Khan

edit

Template:ITN candidate

RD: Sikandar Hayat Khan

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) Sebastian Kurz, Austrian Chancellor, resigns, succeeded by Alexander Schallenberg

edit

Template:ITN candidate

PS: German Wiki adds that Michael Linhart, hitherto ambassador to France, has been sworn in as Schallenberg's successor as foreign minister. – Sca (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Tyson Fury vs. Deontay Wilder III

edit

Template:Archivetop Template:ITN candidate

Template:Small
  • Template:Reply Please come back next year when Usyk and Fury defend their titles in the respective events, and we can re-evaluate the importance from the beginning. And, frankly speaking, this one is the less significant of the two matches because it was held under the auspices of only one out of four professional boxing organisations, while the other one was under the other three.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:53, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd like to see boxing events on the main page, but you seem to have a very good point. Then we should probably wait until the championships unify and argue that it's worth posting because the event has determined the undisputed world champion. Shouldn't we?--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Most of our readers use the mobile view which does not require any balancing. I suppose TRM is talking about the desktop multi-column view and that ITN is being balanced to match the TFA blurb. Currently, that's about an episode of the X-Files which was broadcast 25 years ago. Apparently this is an important anniversary and the news of the day must give way to it. Quality. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:51, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Indeed. The UEFA Nations League Final took place last night, much more historically notable than this, but it's never going to be nominated, let alone posted. The difference here is that there appears to be a few individuals continually attempting to convert the main page of an encyclopedia to a tabloid newspaper. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 11:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah-ha. How about the pink-tops? Martinevans123 (talk) 11:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and individual football matches get column inches in all such newspapers. Doesn't mean we post them all. But I think we're done here for today, the obligatory "trying to make ITN into TOP25" and the inevitable associated peanut gallery. Bingo! Can't wait to do it all again tomorrow. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 11:51, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Archivebottom

(Posted) RD: Yossi Maiman

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted RD/not Blurb) Abolhassan Banisadr dies

edit

Template:ITN candidate

  • Support blurb The first president of a regional power with a rich history of the past 25 centuries as a monarchy is notable. Some may argue that he was in Khomeini's shadow, but he did play an important role in the Iranian Revolution.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD, oppose blurb. Iran had a Supreme Leader (Khomeini) and the office of president was not the highest or most powerful office of the country, and not even the head of state. Many countries have had an office known as president (or similar) that was of secondary importance compared to the actual ruler of the country (for instance, the Soviet Union had a mostly powerless titular head of state when Stalin was the real leader of the country). Abolhassan Banisadr held the office that could at best be described as Iran's number two for only a year, forty years ago. --Tataral (talk) 11:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I tend to disagree. The president of Iran is the figure who represents the country in international relations and has much greater power than many other subordinated office-holders in the world. The Supreme Leader has concentrated power mostly in domestic affairs and is relatively absent from world politics.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Given that he only held the office for a year, he didn't really have a very great impact on the world stage. He's not at all comparable to later presidents who held the office for years and became more widely known. That, and the fact that the position ranks below the Supreme Leader and is not the head of state, is why I believe an RD is more appropriate than a blurb. To illustrate the difference between him and his Supreme Leader counterpart: Everyone have heard of Khomeini who was an extremely well known political leader, but very, very few people outside Iran today have heard of Abolhassan Banisadr. --Tataral (talk) 13:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD, Oppose blurb The shortness of the article (well beyond sufficient for an RD) shows why this isn't anywhere close to the type of world leader that we would normally blurb. There's almost nothing in the article about his contributions to Iran during his time as its President, so it is impossible to judge importance as a major world figure here from that, compared to other world leaders that we have posted as blurbs with long detailed articles on their impact on their country and the world. RD is perfectly fine. --Masem (t) 12:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment From what I understand, it seems that it's his impeachment that has historical significance rather than his presidency as his impeachment cleared the path for the clerics to consolidate their control of the government. I think he's more comparable to Kasa-Vubu's presidency between Mobutu's first and second coups in Congo Scaramouche33 (talk) 13:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • RD only – Out of office 43 years, died age 88. – Sca (talk) 14:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • RD only – per above, Egeymi (talk) 18:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted as RD. I do not mind this in a blurb, but there isn't enough support for it at this time. We can upgrade this to a blurb later when more support appears on this page here. --PFHLai (talk) 19:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 8

edit

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2021 October 8 Template:Cob


(Posted) RD: Martin J. Sherwin

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Mordechai Geldman

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Budge Patty

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Raymond T. Odierno

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) Nobel Peace Prize

edit

Template:ITN candidate

  • Comment Muratov's article needs dividing into sections (someone has tagged it), other than that looks ok. Brandmeistertalk 13:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I in general oppose nominating each Nobel Prize as a separate ITN piece for the same reasons we don't do the same for the winners of the Olympic Games. We can simply reduce that to an ongoing event (3-5 days) about giving out Nobel Prizes. I don't think we need a separate blurb for each Nobel Prize laureate unless a good reason can be provided to make an exception for this particular person/these particular people (same applies to all other nominations of Nobel laureates). An absolutely notable event, but not worthy of six separate news bits (which anyway won't normally fit in the ITN template, as it normally houses 4-5). Comment struck due to the issue being discussed at talk. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 14:08, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template:U Usually the most common criticism here is not enough turnover, not too much. That said, this issue is under discussion at WT:ITN 331dot (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Kunduz mosque bombing

edit

Template:ITN candidate

Global minimum corporate tax

edit

Template:ITN candidate

  • Oppose. Regardless of whether it's significant enough (I'm not sure), the article has numerous quality-related problems and includes no less than six maintenance tags highlighting various problems with the article, and would need a major rewrite and cleanup. --Tataral (talk) 11:49, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - can this tax rule even be enforced? It's just an agreement and even if it were broken, we can't say for sure whether any action would be taken against whichever country breaks it (if America broke it, I doubt any country (barring a couple of countries) would stand up against them). An agreement over nuclear weapons would be more worthy of inclusion as breaking it has much more serious consequences. Tube·of·Light 13:26, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - The most significant part of this tax agreement is the fact that tax haven countries like Ireland also signed onto the agreement.--WaltCip-(talk) 13:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Comment – Presumably the 136 countries each would have to legislate this minimum into effect. Also, the target is a general article about corporate taxes, and doesn't mention this agreement – which AFAIK has generally been absent from prime RS sites. – Sca (talk) 15:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, found three RS articles, added above. Changing opsn to comment for now. – Sca (talk) 23:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality, but support in principle for the subject eventually getting a blurb. - Indefensible (talk) 18:58, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • FWIW, I nominated this back in June when the G7 proposed this Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/June 2021#(Closed) G7 agreement on global corporate tax rate though then it was agreed posted then would be premature due to the need for support by more nations. That support seems to be this point in time. --Masem (t) 22:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment per above: the article unfortunately needs a major scrub before it will be able to meet the guidelines and get posted on the front page, it might be easier to create a standalone article dedicated to this new deal and then cross-link it with the broader article. But we may also have to wait until further details come out and have more reliable sources available to write that content. Because of that, guessing it will probably miss the window again here, but if a draft is started now then it may be ready for posting at whatever the next milestone related to this subject is. - Indefensible (talk) 23:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reminder This only applies to big corporations, grossing 20 billion Euros or more a year. Not as universal as the blurb suggests. Also not taking effect for at least a couple of years, in theory, with ten years of exemption for some (maybe most). InedibleHulk (talk) 00:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's not 20B Euro, its about 750M Euro/yr. Further, as stated "It is estimated to generate around $150 billion in additional global tax revenues annually" which is nothing to sneeze at either. There's a separate, higher tier in the policy but that has to do with the redistribution of their taxes, and applies to those over $125B in profit/yr (which is very few) [41] --Masem (t) 00:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 7

edit

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2021 October 7 Template:Cob


(Posted) RD: Chen Wenxin

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Clement Bowman

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Reggie Parks

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: James Brokenshire

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Closed) Frances Haugen

edit

Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate

  • Oppose A congressional hearing is not the same as a conviction or similar official legislative action by Congress to prevent such actions in the future, so mostly just more on the long-term picture of the conflict between Big Tech and the US Govt. --Masem (t) 13:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Someone talking doesn't seem to worthy of ITN. Especially when someone plans to do a lot more talking in the future. You can re-nominate when she appears on my podcast.Nohomersryan (talk) 13:38, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. People testify before Congress all the time. No indication that the testimony itself, besides generating buzz, is important. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 13:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Close Congressional revelations about Facebook have been going on for years now. None of them have qualified as being particularly notable, much less encyclopedic content, and very few of them have yielded any tangible results. --WaltCip-(talk) 13:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Abot

(Posted) Nobel Prize in Literature

edit

Template:ITN candidate

  • There's one Template:Tl to address but otherwise support. It's a bit odd that the article spends most of its time describing his academic career, rather than his novels, but I don't think that's fatal. Modest Genius talk 14:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • I cut that portion because it didn't seem sourceable anyway. As for the latter point: lit crit is harder to summarize than a career chronology, a problem that plagues many articles about writers, I think. (Not a defence, just an explanation.) AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 15:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • I would think in a few hours, with news of the Nobel, that a bit of commentary about his non-academic writings will be available from news reports covering the Nobel, even if that's only going to end up as 2-3 sentences for us. BBC tends to be more blunt, but I'd look for NYTimes' coverage as a starting point. --Masem (t) 15:19, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posting, the article has been considerably improved since the last time I had a look. --Tone 09:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2021 Balochistan earthquake

edit

Template:ITN candidate

Earthquakes with the so-called "minor" fatality figures have made it to the news (2020 Petrinja earthquake(7), 2015 Sabah earthquake(18)) as well so I don't get the point. CactusTaron (Nopen't) 11:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The point is that this is a "Small earthquake ... not many dead" which is famously dull. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Template:Reply I don't think that comparison is legit at all. Petrinja and its surrounding area have never been hit by a disastrous earthquake that left dozens of thousands dead or injured in the recent history. So, you can't compare this with earthquakes elsewhere in the world. The thing is that Pakistan lies in a convergence zone between the Eurasian and Indian plates, which causes higher tectonic motion and thus more earthquakes hit the region. I've checked the list of earthquakes in Pakistan in the most recent decade, and this one's magnitude is clearly in the lower half (note that we've posted four stronger earthquakes with much greater damage from the list in the last eight years).--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • P.S. And please note that my main point is not the number of fatalities (that's only a side fact that puts this in relation to the other earthquakes in the region), but the very fact that this doesn't receive front-page coverage in the media.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:50, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's no rule that explicitly forbids it and it's widely applied by other users as well. My reasoning is that, unless the news pertains to a story of high encyclopedic value (e.g. scientific discovery, record-setting event, national symbol change etc.), front-page coverage should be relevant. Earthquakes in the same vein as shootings, attacks and aeroplane crashes are a fairly frequent type of event, so it's very logical to take into account how much attention do the media pay to it.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:52, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Using the metric of "front page coverage" biases certain types of stories that are not encyclopedic or tend to be news blips or more regional/national in their scope and not the type of information that otherwise works well in how we are to be summarizing sources compared to isolated/individual events (such as natural disasters or currently the Nobel awards). US media tends to focus too heavily on day to day politics on the front of the fold and tends to bury stories that represent actual events or topics appropriate for an encyclopedia below it (though obviously things like 9/11 or Jan 6 are exceptions). Further, with newspapers waning and online coverage more predominant, defining what is "the front page" is far harder to do. Thus why we give where a news story is being covered any heed in assessing it for ITN, as long as it has that news coverage. --Masem (t) 14:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't claim it's a decisive criterion but it sometimes is one to consider. A sub-6.0-Mwb earthquake in a region with high seismic activity that doesn't leave a large portion of the affected population homeless or destroy cultural heritage and parts of important cities implies that the blurb will be of the simplest possible form "An earthquake kills X and injures Y people.". In such a case, front-page coverage and death toll are relevant criteria to check. And dismissing a nomination because of no front-page coverage doesn't mean accepting nominations that appear on the front page.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do agree that where there is a common/regular/frequent occurrence of disasters - such as hurricane season, typhoon season, tornado season, or an earthquake-prone country - that we shouldn't ITN every single one of these events that have minimal death tolls (on the order of single digits) even if we can create articles about them (lack of ITN doesn't mean lack of notability for a standalone article) And while there's no such thing as MINIMUMDEATHS, when these start going into double digits with the potential to rise, regardless of the above consideration, that's still more notable for ITN's purposes. Its just that we really don't consider where an article appears in a newspaper or website as to judge its importance, as long as it appears somewhere in the paper and is something of in-depth coverage. --Masem (t) 14:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I oftentimes argue that death toll is irrelevant and even supported 2020 Zagreb earthquake with no deaths at the time when the nomination was open, but it was the largest quake that hit the city since 1880, it severely damaged buildings of historical importance in the old town, it resulted in a relocation of an entire hospital and made large disruptions in the entire country. But when there's nothing significant other than the casualty figures, then you realise that death toll and coverage should be given importance. I have nothing against anything or anyone here, but I don't think a quake with a well-written article and two-digit death toll should be a standard for posting, especially because we've already posted four quakes that hit the region in the last eight years.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:06, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 6

edit

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2021 October 6 Template:Cob


(Posted) RD: Yesudasan

edit

Template:ITN candidate

  • This wikibio is long enough (>2000 characters). The longest paragraph has two footnotes, but one of the two refs is actually the subject's own website. Are there independent sources? Also, would things like place of birth and parents (refs needed, btw) fit better in the personal life section, leaving the rest of the biography section to focus on his career? --PFHLai (talk) 15:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Edits done. Decent start class biography. Meets basic hygiene for homepage / RD. Please have a look Template:U. Ktin (talk) 15:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you for the quick response, Ktin. The re-arrangement of text and footnote works for me. The career section could use more refs from sources other than his own website but it's good enough for now. This is READY for RD. --PFHLai (talk) 15:36, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 00:02, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Koichi Sugiyama

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) Nobel Prize in Chemistry

edit

Template:ITN candidate

  • comment: the list article seems pretty decent for an article that was started a few hours ago. unfortunately, it seems the macmillan article was started in 2007 by an editor Template:Oldid2 contained no citations, though it did contain a link to macmillan's web site. much of this text has remained unchanged in the intervening 14 years, and still makes up the bulk of the current article's prose, which explains why Masem has stated that it needs references. perhaps it would benefit from some of the tnt that was being reserved for manabe's article. Template:SmallTemplate:Pbalso, i've taken the liberty of replacing the redirect for macmillan with a direct link. feel free to revert if including the initials was deliberate. dying (talk) 17:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support No cn tag anymore in both articles. Sufficient quality. Grimes2 (talk) 09:55, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: List's article looks adequate; MacMillan's only includes 2 sentences about his research and needs further expansion. SpencerT•C 20:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Done Grimes2 (talk) 09:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Malaria vaccine

edit

Template:ITN candidate

October 5

edit

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2021 October 5 Template:Cob


(Posted) RD: Nadia Chaudhri

edit

Template:ITN candidate

RD: Pat Fish

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Siran Upendra Deraniyagala

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Closed) Nobel Prize in Physics

edit

Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate

Doubt it's worth the effort. Three bolded items are so infrequent. --LaserLegs (talk) 12:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It never had 3 target support in the past (we've had this problem on past Nobels but its such an infrequent thing that its better not to break it for that reason) We'll just have to make due w/ recognizing three articles to review for this. --Masem (t) 12:31, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose two of the targets missing refs, none of them have updates beyond "physical modeling of earth's climate, quantifying variability and reliably predicting global warming.". Climate model and Complex system are too generic to suffice the way it did with the physiology award. The targets need a paragraph about what work the individuals did that was so significant to the scientific community that they warranted a Nobel Prize or it's just minimally comprehensive. --LaserLegs (talk) 12:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The first section of Manabe feels like it is pulled from some published CV or bio or something like that, it doesn't have that Wikipedia "flavor". Parisi is missing any type of discussion of their work (listing papers is not the same as discussing it). --Masem (t) 12:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All articles have been improved and should be adequate by now. --Amanda A. Brant (talk) 12:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    • Manabe's has the issue I pointed out yesterday, which I have to agree with Modest Genius, has potential COI issues by Manabe or someone likely associated with them. Some TNT needs to be applied to that article. --Masem (t) 13:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I'm still disappointed with you all! This must be the first time that the Physics Nobel Prize didn't make it to ITN 2001:861:3286:170:4CC9:F3F5:E506:FF3A (talk) 21:26, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Presumbly, "you all" includes yourself. The nominated articles failed to get ready fast enough and failed to garner support votes here fast enough. Work faster next year! --65.94.214.60 (talk) 21:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Abot

(Closed) Catholic Church sexual abuse cases in France

edit

Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate

  • Comment I'd certainly support this as the disclosure is really shocking, but the proposed article in its current shape is unfortunate. McLaren Report can be considered a proper standard for what the article should look like.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:47, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Indeed, and I can only apologise for not being in a position to write a suitable target article... The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose target article is a proseline disaster. Oppose posting some summary from an arbitrary date going back 70 years. Why not 60? Why not 80? Oppose singling out sexual assault committed by members of a specific club. Oppose posting something that's been posted in one form or another again and again and again and again: catholic priests rape kids. Other stories which are perceived as "common" are routinely derided why should the fact that catholic priests rape kids get a "goodness this is shocking and important news". It's not. So, really, I guess oppose literally everything about this tabloid trash non-story. --LaserLegs (talk) 12:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A "specific club" of over a billion people? Or even just among French Catholics, several million? 331dot (talk) 12:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The membership number is irrelevant. Be it French Catholics, American Catholics, Australian Catholics they seem to have two things in common: passing the plate and raping the boys. Unless there is something unique about Catholic Priests raping kids, it's not especially noteworthy. --LaserLegs (talk) 12:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's not irrelevant, that's a billion potential readers here. Your religious views or lack thereof are not relevant to this nomination. It's certainly noteworthy to the victims- and there does seem to be something unique about it as other religions don't seem to have as extensive a problem like this. 331dot (talk) 12:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's a private club like any other and there is no reason to single out the non-specific crimes of it's membership. --LaserLegs (talk) 12:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That could be said about almost every posting we make. I think the moral and ethical system of a billion people is not "a private club". 331dot (talk) 13:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The very small subset of Catholics that become priests or higher is a private club. And within that bunch, there's a secret club of perverts. Most in the first two levels don't believe sexually abusing kids is morally or ethically OK. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please note my comment "almost certainly needs a proper article rather than the general list of abusers", cheers. And when did we post the abuse of around a quarter of a million children? The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 12:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support in principle but in the same boat as TRM - the one sentence in the target article isn't going to work for this as ITN, and really this would need a proper standalone. It may take a day or two for the weight of this report to have its analysis in European and some US RSes to help build that. --Masem (t) 12:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
select count(*) from tblCrime where religion = 'catholic' doesn't seem like a news item at all. These weren't uncovered in some vault. Come on. --LaserLegs (talk) 12:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We get it. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support in principle but not until this godawful article is cleaned up a bit This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 21:10, 5 October 2021 (UTC) Template:Abot[reply]

October 4

edit

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2021 October 4 Template:Cob


(Closed) 2021 Facebook outage

edit

Template:Archivetop Template:ITN candidate

Major geek news. Article is a stub as I write this, but expect that to change rapidly. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wait Outages aren't especially uncommon. If this one persists for an exceptionally long period of time, or otherwise has an unusual and significant impact, then maybe it will be ITN worthy. At the moment, it seems comparatively minor. Wizardoftheyear (talk) 21:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Template:Ec Support on significance (no comment on quality, as I'm not familiar enough with ITN standards). It's been down for hours and this affects 3 billion people around the world. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 21:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Template:Ec Ritchie beat me to it. I thought that William Shatner going boldly was today's big story but this is really big. The edit conflicts are telling. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Major social media outlets being out for a long period of time and affecting a huge number of people should be notable. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 21:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait outages are regular. The key thing here is whether or not the sites are recoverable (I'm hearing that some of the routing has been utterly buggered). If we are without these websites at this time tomorrow, I'd say it's a story. If it's recovered before, then it's just another outage, and we dealt with it. And the claims of how much it's "affecting" people are a little wild, it's just social media for the love of everything sane. If it had been a global outage of electricity or running water or daylight I'd buy it, but I can't post a photo of my cat to Insta? Seriously? The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 21:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are already reliable sources that say it might not be a co-incidence the downtime happened after this whistleblowing job. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I get it. But of course we're not here for crystal ball moments. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 21:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose If anything, the news that we should be posting about Facebook is the story that was talked about on 60 Minutes last night, that Facebook profited from hate speech and misinformation on its site. [42] (That said, I would not be surprised to learn this downtime is a result of that story, a DDOS by people reacting to that story). But outages even of major social providers is not news. This isn't a major ISP backbone or something like Cloudflare that affects numerous of websites. --Masem (t) 21:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Template:Xt" Agreed. But outages of major social providers right after a whistleblowing job exposing them to a serious negative reputation is a bit different. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I get it. But of course we're not here for crystal ball moments. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 21:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The connection right now is 100% speculative by all sources, so it would not be appropriate to post due to that speculation. --Masem (t) 21:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ec Support Its large enough to be noteable for ITN. NW1223(Howl at me|My hunts) 21:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This does not effect a few million people but most likely up to a billion or more members of these social media platforms. We should not speculate in lasting impact in the first hours of a major event or in this case outage.BabbaQ (talk) 21:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We should not post a regular occurrence in the first few hours until we have a clearer picture of the reasons and real impact. This isn't a tabloid newspaper. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 21:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Several major social media platforms completely collapsing at the same time for hours are not a regular occurence. BabbaQ (talk) 21:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Oh noes people can't check the status of their friends" is not earth shattering news. There absolutely may be news-worthy motives behind it as noted above, but that's the news part, not a hours-long outage. --Masem (t) 21:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Billion dollar losses for the company itself, worldwide problems to log onto several other websites connected to these three sites, this is a global problem and not a "teen issue".BabbaQ (talk) 22:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
AH, well if the blurb said "BILLIONS OF DOLLARS (muhhahahahah) have been wiped off Facebook as they fail to find the on/off switch", then I might be behind it. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Clive Myrie said the value of Facebook shares had "plummeted" by 5%. So that must be true.Martinevans123 (talk) 22:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And they'll recover in the next week or two. That also must be true. So is this a blurb about an inability to post more cat memes, or Facebook's share value? Either way, this is a non-story. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Small
When they're all run by the same company? Yes, I think I can wait for next cat meme while they reboot. If they don't reboot by tomorrow, then I'd agree it's noteworthy. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 21:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It was YouTube a few months ago.[43] Same with AWS,[44] which is relied upon for many business-sensitive applications. These things happen, it's unfortunate but there it is. Not that remarkable really, and we're not a news ticker.  — Amakuru (talk) 22:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
All of my musical contacts and work happens through Facebook and WhatsApp. Don't blame me, blame the thousands of other people that mandate I have to use it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We are all literally on Wikipedia right now, a website. If this website went offline for that amount of hours with no one knowing when or if it would return.. I know more than one editor that would throw fits. So please let us not pretend like we are above Facebook users.BabbaQ (talk) 22:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not blaming anyone for anything. If anyone really gave a shit about anyone or anything, and it was important, they'd just CALL THEM ON THE PHONE. Presumably global telephone networks are still working?? The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I also wouldn't expect us to post on ITN about a Wikipedia outage. (Although for obvious reasons that wouldn't be possible anyway, at least until it was back online).  — Amakuru (talk) 22:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Note that we're unlikely to be able to post anything on this sort of a topic that would have a much bigger and lasting impact. If e.g. a massive solar storm like the Carrington Event or the much larger Solar superstorm of the year AD 774 were to take out the Internet for e few months, then Wikipedia would go offline as well. Count Iblis (talk) 22:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    What is the lasting impact? Facebook is back already. It's a glitch, downtime was longer than usual but it's happened before and will happen again. Comparing not being able to tell the world you're taking a shit versus solar superstorms is a bit of a stretch for me. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Well Facebook is back now. Let's all go and post some pictures of our dinners and put a few "care" emotes on people's posts. But I think this non-story here is about done.  — Amakuru (talk) 22:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose It lasted a few hours, we all survived. Pawnkingthree (talk) 22:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Did we though? Judging by the hysteria above, perhaps millions didn't make it through the few hours of social media blackout? They couldn't adjust their thermostat, nor could they (potentially) order new pants. I'm just glad it's over. Or at least we're at the end of the beginning. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 23:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Nothing particularly unique or impactful happening here. The world will keep moving and I'd bet a good portion of the world population didn't notice or didn't care even when it was happening. DarkSide830 (talk) 23:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose we should demand Facebook stay down for at least 3 days before we promote them on the Wikipedia home page. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 00:07, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support we have an article, and this is certainly In The News. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 00:07, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support this attracted significant media and public attention and has been correlated with a significant decrease in the price of Facebook stock. Billions of people were impacted by the outage. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- I was wondering why everyone seemed happier today! But seriously, this was a big deal, and Facebook's billions of users certainly did notice. It's news when it's just for a few minutes, at 6 hours, it's unprecedented. -- Rockstone[Send me a message!] 02:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • So apparently it was all just backend misconfiguration on Facebook's part, not a hack or DDOS. Just a bad Border Gateway Protocol that wiped their DNS info. So nothing to see here, this is not a news story. [45]. --Masem (t) 02:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't see how it being caused by Facebook's incompetence makes it "not a news story". Should I expect various news agencies to retract their articles? Elli (talk | contribs) 02:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • It's a news story for the media that need space to fill 24/7 , but for a global encyclopedia, that this was a blip due to misconfiguration means this likely will have no enduring effects (If it were the result of the 60 Minutes story, that might be different), and thus not the type of news that WP should be covering in depth as a summary of enduring coverage per NOTNEWS. Further, trying to place this as a plight that millions of people couldn't access Facebook for six hours is decidely a first world inconvenience, compared to actual serious news that affect the well-being of people. We need to avoid the type of media systematic bias that these type of stories draw. --Masem (t) 02:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • Claiming this is a "first world inconvenience" is funny when Facebook (including WhatsApp) is the primary way billions of people in developing nations communicate, and the only access many of them have to the internet. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose article that will not have sustained coverage. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Chrisclear (talk) 03:08, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment To put things in perspective, this was in the news, both CNN and BBC World started their news bulletins with these stories also after the sites came back online. But suppose if I had nominated this event, then you could have said that this is only headline news on Twitter, therefore not a major story. Count Iblis (talk) 04:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. C'mon. Not the end of the world. Minor event in the scheme of things, and its literally no different from 2d ago now.  Nixinova T  C   06:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment everything back as it was less than six hours later, following a "configuration issue", so not even malevolent forces at work, just a mistake. This is such a non-event, it almost isn't worthy of an article. I do feel really sorry for all those people who had to actually walk to their thermostat to adjust the temperature rather than use their phones. What a disaster for them. Perhaps we could set up a helpline, get them some counselling. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 07:07, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose On a number of procedural problems. The proposed blurb has too many bold links, and it does not include the proposed article. Facebook is orange tagged for both proposed blurbs. The event article in the nomination is short and like noted above, will fail WP:SUSTAINED. This information, at least that which is WP:N, would be best folded into the parent Facebook article (which has started to happen already). Even if RS coverage is demonstrated (it is) and if editors want it posted (some do), these problems must be resolved first.130.233.213.141 (talk) 07:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. The alt blurb has just one bold link which is the proposed article;
  2. The Facebook article does not have an orange tag, is a former good article and now generally rated B-class;
  3. The event article is unlikely to fail sustained because it's the largest incident of the sort to date. And it's certainly in the news currently, which is what we are here to report.
So, there are no blockers there. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, but the event is over, it was a glitch, nothing nefarious, nothing long-lasting, nothing remarkable in any sense. Almost six hours without cat memes and hi-tech thermostat usage.... The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Archivebottom

(Posted) Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine

edit

Template:ITN candidate

We have the article nociception (and sub-article thermoception) which describes the general concept, so would be an easy non-bold link to add to the blurb [edit:I've done so]. They don't specifically mention the contributions of Julius & Patapoutian, but that detail would be better explained in the biographies. Modest Genius talk 12:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That'll work. Thanks. We endeavor to do this for the other nobel prize blurbs as well. --LaserLegs (talk) 13:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 3

edit

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2021 October 3 Template:Cob


(Posted) RD: John Chilcot

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Todd Akin

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Jorge Medina

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted to RD) Lars Vilks

edit

Template:ITN candidate

  • Support as soon as the citation needed tag at the end of the last sentence in the Early life and academic career section has been dealt with. Good coverage of a controversial artist. Yakikaki (talk) 20:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support definitely RD, perhaps a blurb might be in order since he was internationally noted for his Muhammad drawings and living under protection. He died in an accident that also killed two police officers, so this is not "old man dying". cart-Talk 20:51, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes a blurb would be appropriate.BabbaQ (talk) 21:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The proposed blurb is better for "old man dying", though. Instead of mentioning his age, the blurb may be better with his drawings and something along the lines of "dies with the policemen charged with protecting him" (some shorter version, of course). --PFHLai (talk) 21:25, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
True, I've proposed an alt blurb that might be more attention grabbing. cart-Talk 21:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I placed this nom. at the beginning when I posted because the instructions in the edit window say "New items go on top, remove the last one when posting". 331dot (talk) 14:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Ping see Wikipedia_talk:In_the_news/Archive_80#Proposed_change:_RDs_roll_off_in_the_order_they_are_posted, where it was decided that the death date is now not used for determining the position of the item in the RD list, as long as the item is posted within seven days. The order is therefore purely based on posting order. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 14:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Pandora Papers

edit

Template:ITN candidate

  • I will oppose for now as the article is still a stub and has a yellow tag to be dealt with JW 1961 Talk 17:48, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on the current basis that this appears aimed more at individual persons rather than the previous two leaks that were focused on corporate affirms - meaning that BLP issues are going to be a factor here. That is, whether these are legitimate means of investment or unethical or whatever problematic aspect needs to be given some time to be evaluated as named BLP are at the center of these leaks. --Masem (t) 18:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see that BLP concerns would be any more of an issue at ITN than in the article itself; if we have content that breaches BLP policies then it doesn't belong in the article whether it's posted on the main page or not, and if the article does comply with BLP policies then it will be just as compliant on the main page as off. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ 21:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The BLP issue (which should be reflected in the article in terms of appropriate wikivoice around assertions being made, given that the figures names do meet PUBLICFIGURE) is that no one yet seems to have validated the legitimacy of these papers as well as if they are any signs of actual wrongdoing. It would be reasonable that our article at this time can same "Among those named in the leak include X, Y, and Z." but there's no need to go into any depth yet about those claims until they have had time for collaboration and validation by other sources. We'd do the same if Wikileaks or something doing a FOIA request leaked similar "revelation" documents that lacked collaboration related to BLP. --Masem (t) 22:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would suggest hold - clearly newsworthy, but The Guardian promises that it will name "35 current and former heads of state and more than 300 public officials". The names will clearly be rolled out over a period of time to maintain interest. We should consider holding until the rollout is complete and the article is fully populated, and (less likely) in case of BLP issues like that the documents turn out to have been edited or partially forged. Blythwood (talk) 19:07, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional support pending improvement per nom. Per article, these even surpass the Panama Papers. Brandmeistertalk 19:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait – With a text of about 500 words, the article is rather thin at this point. Developing. – Sca (talk) 19:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Article's length is satisfactory, and it's currently one of the top news stories globally. People are going to be looking for our article, we should post it now. Mlb96 (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • If people are coming to Wikipedia to read about breaking news, they are at the wrong site. --Masem (t) 22:05, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • Not exactly. The purpose of ITN is Template:Tq. Pawnkingthree (talk) 22:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • Yes, but that really only works best for existing content where the article has been developed either as an item that only recently has come into the news but otherwise has been the subject of sources before, or as an event that long-knew was coming and thus has had an article in preparation for that event, and thus has a reasonable evaluation for quality can be made. Breaking news that requires a brand new article takes time for that article to be developed, and that means there are metrics we will need to consider due to the freshly made article such as BLP impact here. That's why ITN does not worry about timeliness (posting within the same day) and thus we we're not worried about trying to match what the news is talking about immediately. We want the articles to reflect what WP's quality can be rather than the speed of 24/7 news networks. --Masem (t) 23:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
          I beg to differ. 2021 Guinea coup d'état was an event that has not been the subject of sources because, well, it happened right on the eyes of the world. The article was promoted to ITN the day following the coup. So no, Pawnkingthree is right here. We can post it even right now, and in fact, the sooner the better, BUT that shouldn't be done at the expense of quality. I think some more info might be warranted there, because for almost 3TB of data, the scope seems rather inadequate so far. So hold the nomination for now, and I'm looking forward to see it posted once it's expanded. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 01:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
          • I didn't say that WP doesn't have the capacity to make decent articles on breaking news, just that these often take more time and effort to be of minimal quality to be ready for posting at ITN. Hence why trying to equate ITN to having to cover "breaking news" is the wrong approach. If editors are able to make a decent quality article about an event within a few hours of that event happening (it has been done!) then great. But in this specific case, this is a news event that has several potential BLP potholes that we should be wary of rushing to post even if the article is being worked on. There is a way to write about this to avoid the BLP aspects and thus make it appropriate for posting but that's not being done from what I've seen so far. --Masem (t) 03:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Support Though it is a quickly expanding article that is being smoothed out, this is to be expected because it is in the news. This news is very significant and should be included into the in the news project immediately.--WMrapids (talk) 02:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for the time being, largely per the concerns raised by Masem. The article at present is a bit of a dump of the main individual targets of the Pandora Papers, but without any critical analysis or secondary sourcing discussing the evidence and reliability etc of linking those names to the alleged offenses. As such, and with the authenticity of the Pandora Papers not yet attested in independent reliable sources, I think the page currently lacks WP:BALANCE from a BLP standpoint.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Widely covered, leads many RS sites Monday. – Sca (talk) 12:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for now. We walk a dangerous road trying to get out in front with some serious WP:BLP claims on the front page of an online encyclopedia. With the claims in these documents being as of yet unverified, there are legal matters at play here.--WaltCip-(talk) 13:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    A BLP briar patch, maybe. OTOH, U.S. libel law requires public officials figures claiming libel to prove "actual malice" on the part of the defendant(s), and Wikipedia is sited in the U.S. – Sca (talk) 14:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Not so much the reporting, but whether any of those names did anything illegal or not, with the current reporting clearly weighing on "they did a baaaad thing" side for this and prejudging those named. That's what we have to be careful about repeating ourselves at this point until there's the type of analysis that suggests there is actual civil or criminal offenses to be sought here, or that there's a significant impact on those named. --Masem (t) 14:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe if some of those named respond publicly to the allegations (or even file lawsuits) we could eventually hang our hat on such responses? – Sca (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    But WP cares not if any allegations are true. The news item is the leak of such a huge amount of sensitive financial material and the furore this has caused? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    WP absolutely does care about truthfulness of allegations (thus waiting for some type of corroboration in other sources), or the impact of those allegations (say, one of these people was let go due to the issue) if we are naming people (per BLP, RECENTISM, and NOTNEWS). We are not supposed to rush to include every bit of news about a person just becuase it was reported, we need to judge in terms of enduring coverage about this. That's not to say we can talk about this leak absent names or without excessive specifics on names, but we should not be presuming right now that any of the named individuals have done anything wrong-hence why this is just a BLP landmind but not an impossible article to write about or feature as ITN. The previous leaked mentioned were only about companies and there, there's zero BLP issues to worry about though we still needed to make sure that Wikivoice did not say the companies were immediately at fault. --Masem (t) 16:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    This has not made the headlines because it's "all true", but because it has happened at all? If it was all proved to be fake news tomorrow, the impact would still have happened. I don't think anyone's proposing a blurb with a few juicy names sprinkled through it. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    It's not the blurb or its "being in the news" factor, it is the article quality wrt to BLP. It names people in depth (heck there is now List of people named in the Pandora Papers which to me is far too early given the lack of verification/corroboration on this leak). I realize that this was a work by 650+ journalists and so its not like these are not likely to be falsified or the like, but we really should be careful around the BLP due to first publication - this is like a primary source rather than secondary. If the article briefly touched on names without specific mention of what the papers "accuse" them of at this time, that would be far more appropriate in terms of quality. That's my concern. --Masem (t) 16:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think that this merits posting but we need to figure out how to do so and work within BLP. 331dot (talk) 16:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • As long as we don't qualify those activities as illegal or legal in own wikivoice and merely describe what reliable sources state, then there are no BLP issues. The current blurb in that regard look ok and neutral to me. Brandmeistertalk 18:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I still think we should wait to see of some of those named respond publicly. – Sca (talk) 19:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Clearly in the news and of worldwide interest. The coverage is indeed extensive. Since we are not judging the validity of these documents but merely reporting on their notable release, this blurb is a natural for ITN, in my view. Article is now of sufficient length and well-referenced. Jusdafax (talk) 20:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per Jusdafax, this is definitively something worth posting, and BLP concerns should (as with every single other article on the project) be addressed in the way they are addressed normally. This has been headline news, multiple articles simultaneously on my news feeds. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support In the news worldwide, BLP concerns are not a major enough issue to keep us from posting, we just need to be careful with what the page says. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment what are we now, three days in? Still the tip-top news report. This is in the news, something a LOT of people are interested in learning about, absolute classic ITN material. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 07:08, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 10:51, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Cyclone Shaheen

edit

Template:ITN candidate

  • Wait Three deaths, even from a rare weather event, isn't that significant yet to post, but it is still a ongoing weather event and could get worse. --Masem (t) 17:38, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Passing north of Arabia for any amount of time is very unusual according to File:North Indian cyclone tracks 1970-2005.jpg. The fat north part of the subcontinental peninsula seems to provide shielding. Comparing that map to File:Gulab-Shaheen 2021 track.png shows the whole path is pretty weird including going all the way to an Omani seaport which is deeper into the gulf than the Oman capital on the north coast. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 00:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Oppose as Hurricane Noah is too early HurricaneEdgar 01:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

26 in the article counting them together. In the North Atlantic the name wouldn't change from crossing the Indian peninsula then becoming a nameable storm again. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 06:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes because Gulab killed some in India, became remnant low and "retropicalized" in the West Indian Ocean. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 17:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is basically a single cyclone that received two names. But I think that the second iteration of the storm (Shaheen) had much more severe impacts than the first iteration. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 18:06, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nevertheless for whatever reason deaths seem to be about equal which could be any combination of luck, total population affected differences, population who didn't know it was coming differences, building quality differences, how many on each side took less precaution than wise etc. Damage-wise I don't doubt a hurricane dropping years of rain on a populous desert caused more severe impacts than a TS in a place that gets frequent TCs and yearly monsoons. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 19:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2021 London Marathon

edit

Template:ITN candidate

RD: Bernard Tapie

edit

Template:ITN candidate

October 2

edit

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2021 October 2 Template:Cob


RD: John Wes Townley

edit

Template:ITN candidate

RD: Sidney Walton

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Ziauddin Ahmed Bablu

edit

Template:ITN candidate

RD: Umer Shareef

edit

Template:ITN candidate

October 1

edit

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2021 October 1 Template:Cob


(Posted) RD: Eberhard Panitz

edit

Template:ITN candidate

Template:Done Grimes2 (talk) 12:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Dennis Walters

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Lissy Jarvik

edit

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) Doumbouya sworn in as Guinean president

edit

Template:ITN candidate

International recognition is not required. Doumbouya is running the country. Period. --LaserLegs (talk) 23:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]