Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 February 19

< Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files

< February 18	February 20 >

February 19

File:Nintendo DSi XL.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: nominator withdrawal; image re-tagged for speedy deletion under F11 criterion. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 17:16, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nintendo DSi XL.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

According to the uploader, the source and author of the image is Nintendo. As far as my knowledge goes, Nintendo wouldn't, nor has ever, released an image of theirs under CC-BY-SA as implied by the license. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The erasing is not needed for any reason it is authorized. Go back to your cage and will debate on this. The pictures and sectors are correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.241.208 (talk) 04:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The source of the image is Nintendo, and since an exact source of the image is not given (a URL), it is not known whether or not the file is freely licensed, which there is basically a 99.9% chance that it is not. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Broadstone Middle Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: nominator withdrawal; image re-tagged for speedy deletion under F11 criterion. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 17:16, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Broadstone Middle Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image was retrieved from the school website, [1]. There is no indication that the image is in the public domain. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:17, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:P5YbORG.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:P5YbORG.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Likely unfree file based on the fact it looks like a promo image, most likely copyrighted. Mike moral ♪♫ 04:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Psyborgcorp2010.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Psyborgcorp2010.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Like unfree file as it is a promo image from the groups Myspace profile: [2] Mike moral ♪♫ 04:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pompom.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pompom.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Source given does not have a CC by SA license as claimed in the summary. Image was uploaded by serial copyvio uploader. <>Multi‑Xfer<> (talk) 09:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Jack Merridew 00:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Knight Goby.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knight Goby.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Copyright violation [3] <>Multi‑Xfer<> (talk) 09:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Jack Merridew 00:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Abramites hypselonotus.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abramites hypselonotus.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Likely copyvio. Image is scanned from a paper source, as evicenced by the visible dots. Uploaded by serial copyvio uploader. <>Multi‑Xfer<> (talk) 09:36, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Jack Merridew 00:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:File name.ext

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:File name.ext (delete | talk | history | logs).

the source link is restricted Hidro (talk) 10:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070110 Rock & Roll McDonald's (9).JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:43, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:20070110 Rock & Roll McDonald's (9).JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Advertising - 2D artwork - FoP applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070110 Rock & Roll McDonald's (10).JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:20070110 Rock & Roll McDonald's (10).JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Marketing art -2D artwork, Fop Applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070110 Rock & Roll McDonald's (11).JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:20070110 Rock & Roll McDonald's (11).JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Marketing artwork - 2D art - FoP applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070530 35 East Wacker Clock.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:20070530 35 East Wacker Clock.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

The clock is a work of artistic craftmanship - Does FoP apply given that it's possibly an architectural element of the building (pre 1992)? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would imagine so.
Keep per above. — BQZip01 — ^talk 15:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070110 Charter One Pavillion Sign.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:20070110 Charter One Pavillion Sign.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

2D/3D artwork & Inclusion or what looks like the RBS logo - FoP Applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070122 Central Station Model from Museum Campus Sales Center.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:20070122 Central Station Model from Museum Campus Sales Center.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

3D Model - So FoP not applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070122 Central Station Model from Museum Park Sales Center.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:20070122 Central Station Model from Museum Park Sales Center.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

3D artwok - model Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20070122 Near South Side Model from Museum Park Sales Center.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:20070122 Near South Side Model from Museum Park Sales Center.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Marketing artwork -2D/3D artwork - FoP not applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dir en Grey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dir en Grey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This may not be a free file. allen四names 19:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Crowned Eagle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crowned Eagle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The image is also found on photobucket here and images from photobucket do not generally have a suitable license for the wiki. Does it have a PD licence as claimed? Snowman (talk) 19:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Summer 2006 CD Label.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Summer 2006 CD Label.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

CD artwork Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As the description of the file states, the uploader lightscribed the picture of himself onto a DVD. — ξ ^xplicit 01:39, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Concessioncast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Concessioncast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

There's nothing to indicate CC licensing at the source: http://concessioncomic.com/index.php?pid=20100126 Eeekster (talk) 23:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Found a CC notice. This can be closed. Eeekster (talk) 23:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The CC notice is CC-BY-NC-SA witch is not considered a free license. -- allen四names 19:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave The image, do not commence erasing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.241.208 (talk) 22:51, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_February_19&oldid=1089068952"