Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 May 16

May 16

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 16, 2015.

Untitled Cold War thriller

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete both. Just Chilling (talk) 16:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Cold War thriller → Bridge of Spies (film) (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Untitled Cold War Spy Thriller → Bridge of Spies (film) (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Inappropriate redirect as the film now has a title. Tavix | Talk 19:42, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since the target is obviously titled. --Lenticel ^(talk) 23:53, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there are so many of these film projects about cold war spy thrillers around in vaults or development hell this is hardly specific enough to determine anything -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 00:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sutton College

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 May 27#Sutton College

Final fantasy vii the lost memory

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete both. Just Chilling (talk) 16:51, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final fantasy vii the lost memory → Final Fantasy VII (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Final fantasy vii:the lost memory → Final Fantasy VII (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I think this is a hoax. It described a game that was supposed to come out in 2011 or 2012, but I think it was WP:MADEUP. --BDD (talk) 18:27, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as misleading. This is a piece of fan fiction. --Lenticel ^(talk) 23:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is a clear hoax that was created in mid 2010, no one will search for this.--70.27.229.11 (talk) 04:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

FF7: Searching for the Truth

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Just Chilling (talk) 15:29, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FF7: Searching for the Truth → Final Fantasy VII (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Checking out the history here, this used to describe a roleplaying website set in the Final Fantasy VII. It's not notable or mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. BDD (talk) 18:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it seems that "searching for the truth" just lead me to a Let's Play FF7 video. --Lenticel ^(talk) 23:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Test 0

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Just Chilling (talk) 18:54, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Test 0 → Final Fantasy VII (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This glitch from Final Fantasy VII isn't mentioned at the target article or elsewhere on Wikipedia. The phrase itself is hopelessly vague. Delete per WP:NOTWIKIA, WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE, etc. BDD (talk) 18:18, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems to be some sort of glitch. However, the redirect itself is a bit vague. --Lenticel ^(talk) 23:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete generic name for tests in many places -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 00:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Air traffic

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 May 26#Air traffic

2015 Nepal earthquake

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget to April 2015 Nepal earthquake. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Nepal earthquake → Nepal earthquake (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Despite the occurrence of some newsworthy aftershocks, I believe that history will record the April 2015 Nepal earthquake - the one that killed thousands of people and destroyed ancient buildings - as the 2015 Nepal earthquake. I therefore believe that either 2015 Nepal earthquake should point to April 2015 Nepal earthquake, or that April 2015 Nepal earthquake should be moved back to 2015 Nepal earthquake. bd2412 T 04:18, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Support. Retarget to April 2015 Nepal earthquake. I completely agree. Regardless of what name (or fate) is ultimately chosen for the May aftershock page, 2015 Nepal earthquake should point to the April earthquake. A reader searching for this, a completely reasonable term that additionally follows our own style, should not be redirected to a disambiguation page. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 12:00, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Even though it was an aftershock, the May event was still quite serious. I think it's too early to say that the April one will be the dominant usage in the future. --BDD (talk) 18:22, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose if I understand right. Are you saying that "2015 Nepal earthquake" should be redirected to the disambiguation page located at "Nepal earthquake"? I disagree with this. I support the comments above: "2015 Nepal Earthquake" should redirect to the "April 2015 Nepal earthquake" page, unless another huge earthquake happens later this year in Nepal. J^♯m (talk | contribs) 20:54, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015 Nepal earthquake is already an article.--70.27.229.11 (talk) 05:00, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jsharpminor: Afraid there is some misunderstanding here and it is largely my fault. The current situation is: "2015 Nepal earthquake" redirects to the DAB page, "Nepal earthquake". The proposal is to fix that. Our statements agree, yet I said "Support" and you said "Oppose". Afraid we both used the wrong terms. The choices are: "Keep", "Retarget" and "Delete", correct? So both of our positions, myself (Racerx11) and you (J♯m), should both be "Retarget". Am I right or am I still confused?

User 70.27.229.11, We are not talking about May 2015 Nepal earthquake, we are discussing what the April earthquake page should be named, and what "2015 Nepal earthquake" should point to.

My main point is, a reader who searches the term "2015 Nepal earthquake", should not be hit with anything like this. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 05:26, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to April 2015 Nepal earthquake as proposed. If the reader wants the major aftershock or the list of aftershocks, they can find the link there. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 09:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to April 2015 Nepal earthquake, as per above. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 10:44, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to April 2015 Nepal earthquake as Primary Topic. PamD 19:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Retarget to April 2015 Nepal earthquake as proposed. (I originally misunderstood the exact issue here, but I think I understand it now.) If the May aftershocks do not have their own pages, then this is a 2015 event. The death toll has been enormous from one May aftershock in particular. However, if another unrelated major earthquake hits Nepal in 2015, then we should re-examine this question. Until then, this is a multi-month event that should be named for the year, or perhaps as the Spring 2015 Earthquake. This is definitely what people will want when they search for the 2015 Nepal earthquake. As an aftershock, the May quake is a subordinate topic. Dcs002 (talk) 02:05, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2023 AFC Asian Cup

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Just Chilling (talk) 20:55, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2023 AFC Asian Cup → AFC Asian Cup (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. The article offers no information about this event. Tavix | Talk 00:27, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Lenticel ^(talk) 15:26, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 18:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - can be re-created nearer the event time. Giant Snowman 18:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - way too far in the future to be a plausible search term. Fenix down (talk) 14:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.