The Wikipedia Library supports open access. It's one of our five critical goals, in fact. To understand why we still collaborate with traditional publishers, see our helpful explanation. Those collaborations are complementary to advancing towards a fuller, more open future for knowledge.
Open access (OA) is the right and freedom to read research, generally online, and ideally with the ability to reuse it without restraint. Gratis OA is that freedom to read, and Libre OA is the full freedom to read and reuse. The full freedom, as defined in the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOIA) includes:
- "free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited."
The Wikipedia Library is an open research hub serving the Wikimedia community of contributors. We are interested in all projects and partnerships that help editors do better research. While we have been successful in receiving donations to paywalled (closed access) resources from publishers like Elsevier and JSTOR, we support the broader move towards open access. For more information about why our strategy focuses on paid partnerships, see our explanation. We recognize that a modern library should help editors find and use open access resources, because they are increasing in number and quality, and because they provide an optimal experience for readers of the encyclopedia when they try to access and verify the sources used on Wikipedia. This page is about ways in which you, and we, can keep the world moving not just towards open knowledge but towards open access to the research that underlies it.
Find OA resources
editLocate sources in OA directories and repositories
edit- OpenDOAR: website
- Open Access Publishing in European Networks (OAPEN) Library: website
- ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources: website
- Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ): website
- Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB): website
- Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR): website
- Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE): website
- COnnecting REpositories (CORE): website
- OAD index of OA book publishers
- OAD index of open data repositories
Use major OA portals and publishers
edit- PubMed Central free full text: website
- see also PubMed sample search for free full text
- arXiv: website
- PLOS: website
- BioMed Central: website
- MDPI: website
- Frontiers: website
- PeerJ: website
- eLife: website
- BMJ: website
- Springer Open: website
- SAGE Open: website
- Category:Open access (publishing)
- Category:Open access publishers
- Determine OAness with HowOpenIsIt? Open Article Gauge
- Avoid predatory open access journals with Beall's List
- Use Think.Check.Submit to help choose the right journal to submit to
Raise awareness about access programs for developing nations
edit- AGORA Access to Global Online Research on Agriculture program: website
- ARDI Access to Research for Development and Innovation: website
- OARE Open Access to Research in the Environment: website
- Research4Life: website
- TEEAL The Essential Electronic Agricultural Library: website
What you can do
editParticipate in OA initiatives
edit- Join WikiProject Open Access
- Use Open Access Button (OA Button): website
- Advance WikiProject Signalling Open Access
- Develop Open Access Reader
- Join WikiProject Open
- Join WikiSource WikiProject Open Access
- Get involved with WikiData WikiProject Source Metadata
- Upload OA academic papers to Wikisource
- Volunteer with the Open Access Directory
- Contribute to OA wikis
- Follow social media and blogs about OA:
- Participate in Open Access Week: website
Join a network of supporters
editThis user is interested in open access to research literature. |
Place {{User:UBX/open access}} on your userpage
Category:Wikipedians interested in open access
Tag it when you see it
edit- Mark OA references with Template:Open_access
- Follow developments with Template:OA-ness
Join and support OA organizations
edit- Creative Commons: website
- Open Knowledge Foundation: website
- Open Society Foundations: website
- Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC): website
- Right to Research Coalition: website
- Open Science Federation: website
- Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) website
- Internet Archive: website
- WebCite: website
- CKAN the open source data portal software: website
- Electronic Information for Libraries (EIFL): website
- Enabling Open Scholarship (EOS): website
- Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) website
Attend OA conferences and events
editLearn about OA
editOverview
editPrinciples and declarations
edit- Index of declarations:
- Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing: Full text
- Panton Principles: Full text
- Budapest Open Access Initiative: Full text
- Sunlight Foundation guidelines: Full text
- Finch Report: Full text
- Berlin Declaration on Open Access: Full text
Books
edit- The Access Principle, by John Willinsky: Full text Amazon
- Open Access, by Peter Suber: Full text Amazon
Promote major OA mandates
edit- Coalition of Open Access Policy Institutions (COAPI): website
- Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies (ROARMAP): website
- UNESCO Global Open Access Portal: website
- MELIBEA Directory and estimator policies for open access to scientific production: website
University Policies
edit- Berkeley
- MIT
- Duke
- University of California
- Harvard
- UCSF
- Princeton
- Stanford Graduate School of Education
- University of Bath
Government, Major Funding Body, and Other Open Access Policies
edit- UK
- US NIH
- Gates Foundation
- Wellcome Trust
- Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies
What The Wikipedia Library can do
editWe want editors to have the best possible, highest quality and most relevant sources for their work, which should be cited as such. The Wikipedia Library partners with paywalled journals and database providers because we have an encyclopedia to write today, yet much of the world's knowledge is locked behind paywalls. The balance is in
Here's our stance on why partnering with paywalled information sources is actually complementary to embracing and advocating for open access:
And here are some ways that The Wikipedia Library can support a broader move towards OA now:
Recognize the importance of OA
edit- Broadcast that OA helps editors access reliable sources to improve Wikipedia and deepen the sharing of knowledge to readers, and is thus a natural Wikipedia Library ally
- Participate in research initiatives that measure the dynamics between Wikipedia and peer-reviewed literature in terms of impact on editors and readers
Provide editors with support in finding and identifying OA
edit- Point out the availability of OA within donated publisher resources, such as JSTOR's 6 articles a month free article access
- Provide links to pre-publication or other open repository versions of published research alongside paywalled journals, where available
- Provide full citation information alongside links to closed access versions so editors can track down freely available copies
- When citing non-OA work in the References, a closely related OA work could be a "see also"
- Include relevant OA sources under "Further Reading"
- Continue to support OA Signalling and related projects that increase the ability of Wikipedia to take advantage of OA
- Experiment with tools for readers to find the latest OA research for related Wikipedia entries on emerging topics
- Promote Open Access Button onwiki
- Arrange free access for all incoming Wikipedia traffic, or at least an extended preview, or open-access excerpt.
Discuss shifting priorities around OA and verifiability
edit- Consider a ceteris paribus (all things being equal) principle that could apply to the selection of OA sources, as offering a verifiability advantage of reader access
- Explore adopting within the policies and guidelines a recognition that OA contributes to the quality of Wikipedia in terms of verifiability and that OA sources should be encouraged, if not preferred