Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Philippines
Points of interest related to Philippines on Wikipedia: Outline – History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Deletions – Stubs – Assessment – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Philippines. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Philippines|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Philippines. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Asia.
watch |
- See also: Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines
Philippines
edit- Juliana Rae Ibay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Local politician with no inherent notability. Only one reliable source cited; others are IMDB, a self-described blog, and something that cites wikipedia. — Moriwen (talk) 15:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — Moriwen (talk) 15:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Philippines. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Articles of members of city councils of major cities are kept.Djflem (talk) 18:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weakest of keeps Ibay's membership in the Manila City Council has been mostly nondescript until recently. Elections are in May 2025, and this early, politicians are jockeying for positions. Ibay is a councilor representing the youth as the city president of the Manila Sangguniang Kabataan (youth council); normally, such councilors are the council's committee chairperson on youth and sports. However, she was unseated recently and this has caused controversy if that was even allowed. So her notability is on this WP:1E, but this is not the last time we'd see her as a politician. Howard the Duck (talk) 22:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep for the reason as HTD's. --- Tito Pao (talk) 10:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:spa|username}} ; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}} . |
- Renz Nathaniel Cruz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unclear if there's enough here for WP:CREATIVE/GNG. Most of the sources have him name-checked as a member of the musical ensemble, but I'm not seeing any in-depth coverage. KH-1 (talk) 03:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Theatre, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. This person has barely done any professional work, let alone had a notable career. Strong delete. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as he clearly isn't notable. Tavantius (talk) 16:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Collapse spate of brand new editors seemingly canvassed to this discussion. Daniel (talk) 09:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
|
---|
|
- Delete per WP:SIGCOV and the socks chiming in on this discussion aren't helping their cause. APK hi :-) (talk) 06:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Collapse spate of brand new editors seemingly canvassed to this discussion. Daniel (talk) 09:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
|
---|
|
- To all of the new editors to Wikipedia, first "Welcome!" Secondly, Wikipedia determines whether or not an article should be Kept or Deleted not based on a vote count but based on whether or not notability can be established by reliable, independent secondary sources. They can't be "passing mentions" but provide SIGCOV (significant coverage). So, your pleas to save this article or accusations against other editors or Wikipedia won't have much impact but if you could find additional sources from mainstream new sources (not blogs or social media) could help establish notability and influence whether or not this article is Kept or not. Wikipedia is governed not by editors' opinions but by policies and guidelines and this is how we determine what articles should be Kept and which ones should be Deleted. Liz Read! Talk! 07:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Collapse spate of brand new editors seemingly canvassed to this discussion. Daniel (talk) 09:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
|
---|
|
- Comment: Account creation dates: User:Ixo490: 5 hours ago, User:Thompson.walkins: 3 hours ago, User:Editlife1tr: 3 hours ago, User:Loewemathers: 2 hours ago, User:TOOLINK: 2 hours ago. Northern Moonlight 09:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- As an uninvolved administrator, I have taken actions (including page protection and collapsing seemingly-canvassed participation from brand new editors), to restore order and remove disruption from this debate. Daniel (talk) 09:22, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Certainly seems like a talented artist who could merit an article at some point, but right now, the notability just isn't there. To anyone canvassed to come here: deletion isn't a punishment, it's just that Wikipedia's purpose is to recognize notability, not help create it. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 13:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I wish him well, but (agreeing with CoffeeCrumbs) WP:TOOSOON. Narky Blert (talk) 14:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - first, and most importantly, notability is not established. Secondly, the article was written by an obvious WP:SPA who created the article in their own sandbox two hours after opening their account. Thirdly, the number of other SPAs flooding this discussion with pwersonal attacks and assumptions of bad faith doesn't inspire confidence. If the article subject was truly notable there'd be no need for all that. It seems to me the subject or their friends or fans are involved in this. - The literary leader of the age ✉ 23:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - In agreement with all the real voters above. Upon inspection, I think his OperaJuan operation might be closer to notability because they have received some media notice in their country. But since this article is about Mr. R.N. Cruz, he must achieve notability via reliable media coverage, and so far he's only in self-promotional mode. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete for now per above and WP:TOOSOON. --Lenticel (talk) 00:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Batangas–Quezon Road (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This road does not meet WP:GEOROAD or WP:GNG. Listed sources are primary (1-5) or passing mentions (6). A search has not revealed any sources that would qualify as secondary and WP:SIGCOV. Possibly could be made a redirect to Batangas City. Garsh (talk) 04:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Garsh2: I found this source which may contribute to notability. Left guide (talk) 08:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- That article is referring to the Toll Road 4 project between Batangas and Quezon, not the Batangas-Quezon Road. Ganmatthew (talk • contribs) 15:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Agree with nomination, both with regards to coverage and notability. Ganmatthew (talk • contribs) 15:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sangguniang Kabataan of Barangay Cagniog, Surigao City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable youth council of a non-notable barangay in Surigao City. Redirecting as an WP:ATD would be a bad idea since this is not a plausible search term. HueMan1 (talk) 00:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Philippines. HueMan1 (talk) 00:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:GNG Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 03:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as per above. We don't even have Surigao City Council and Sangguniang Barangay of Cagniog. Howard the Duck (talk) 11:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Cagniog was created two days ago by the same editor. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable --Lenticel (talk) 01:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Commment: Draft:Sangguniang Kabataan of Barangay Cagniog, Surigao City was created first and draftified; the creator then recreated in mainspace. Sennecaster (Chat) 21:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --- Tito Pao (talk) 10:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Samantha Cabiles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSKATE. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:46, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Skating, and Philippines. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:46, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 17:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Not very much coverage about this person, this is just a quick mention [1] and that's about all I can find. Oaktree b (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)