Talk:hug
RFV discussion
edit
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Sense: "A crushing embrace." What does this really mean and do we actually use the word like this? ---> Tooironic 13:16, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds like a bear hug. I note also that the 1st def and the def of embrace are circular. Pingku 13:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- As written, it's redundant to .1 An affectionate close embrace. Such an embrace could be crushing yet effectionate. I'd just delete it, but hey, why not try and cite it now it's here. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
RFV failed, sense removed. —RuakhTALK 19:10, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
*Anger*?
editI’ve never even *conceived* of someone hugging another in anger... perhaps I’m missing something contextually? BlackAdvisor (talk) 00:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, I saw that, that’s what led to me asking about it.... I’m interested in *why* it was added BlackAdvisor (talk) 18:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- I imagine they meant the crushing hug of an angry bear. Equinox ◑ 21:23, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
ah alright BlackAdvisor (talk) 22:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Rfv-sense: To crouch; huddle as with cold Notusbutthem (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
cited Kiwima (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 20:09, 16 November 2021 (UTC)